BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2666
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 2666 (Daly) - As Amended: April 22, 2014
Policy Committee: Natural
ResourcesVote:9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill exempts the United States (US) and its agencies and
instrumentalities from the requirements of the Electronic Waste
Recycling Act (Act).
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown revenue loss to CalRecycle in the $100,000 to $200,000
range (Electronic Waste and Recovery and Recycling Account).
Due to surpluses in this fund, the e-waste fees were reduced
from $6 ,$8 and $10 (based on screen size) to $3, $4 and $5 in
January 2013. Excess reserves in the fund are anticipated to
be approximately $50 million in 2014-15.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. Under the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution,
the US government is immune from taxation. However, the
federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
specifies that US government entities are required to pay
"regulatory fees," as determined by federal law.
In May 2001, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
issued a decision that California's e-waste fee is a tax under
federal law; therefore, US government entities are not subject
to the fee. This bill aligns California statute with federal
law as it relates to collection of the e-waste fee.
2)Background. In 2001, the Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) determined that cathode ray tube (CRT) screens
AB 2666
Page 2
are hazardous, and as such, must be managed as hazardous waste
when disposed. In response to this determination, the
Legislature enacted SB 20 and SB 50 (Sher) in 2003, which
established the Act to create a cost-free and convenient way
for consumers to return, recycle, and ensure the safe and
environmentally-sound disposal of hazardous video display
devices. The Act imposes a fee on every consumer at the point
of sale. The Board of Equalization (BOE) deposits the fee
revenue into the Electronic Waste and Recovery and Recycling
Account, which may be spent solely for activities that relate
to reuse, recycling, and proper disposal.
3)Fee or Tax ? BOE staff considers the fee to be a
nondiscriminatory charge assessed in connection with
California's hazardous waste regulatory program. Accordingly,
BOE staff assert that the federal government should pay the
fee because Congress expressly waived sovereign immunity when
it enacted RCRA in 1976.
However, the federal government considers the fee to be a tax
and does not reimburse retailers. Although existing law
requires the consumer (e.g. federal government) to pay the
fee, the law requires the retailer to collect and remit the
fee to the BOE. The retailer must remit the fee to the BOE,
regardless of whether the retailer is able to collect the fee
from the federal government.
Analysis Prepared by : Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)
319-2081