BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                                  SENATE HUMAN
                               SERVICES COMMITTEE
                            Senator Jim Beall, Chair


          BILL NO:       AB 2668                                      
          A
          AUTHOR:        Quirk-Silva                                  
          B
          VERSION:       May 7, 2014
          HEARING DATE:  June 24, 2014                                
          2
          FISCAL:        Yes                                          
          6
                                                                      
          6
          CONSULTANT:    Sara Rogers                                  
          8

                                        

                                     SUBJECT
                                         
                    Foster care: nonminor dependent parents

                                     SUMMARY  

          This bill would authorize the development of a "parenting  
          support plan" between a non-minor dependent who resides in  
          a supervised independent living placement and an identified  
          responsible adult who has agreed to act as a mentor under  
          the oversight of the county welfare department.  
          Additionally, this bill provides that following approval of  
          the plan, the non-minor dependent would receive an  
          additional $200 payment per month.

                                     ABSTRACT  
          
           Existing Law:


           1)Establishes the California Fostering Connections to  
            Success Act, which corresponds with the federal Fostering  
            Connections to Success Act that provided an option for  
            states to receive federal financial participation for  

                                                         Continued---




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageB


          
            nonminor dependents of the juvenile court who satisfy  
            certain conditions. (AB 12, Beall &Bass, 2010)


          2)Defines "nonminor dependent" as a current or former  
            foster youth who is between the ages of 18 and 21, is in  
            foster care under responsibility of the county welfare  
            department, county probation department, or Indian Tribe,  
            and is participating in a transitional independent living  
            plan. (WIC 11400 (v))


          3)Provides for the voluntary continuation or reentry into  
            foster care for nonminor dependents or delinquents who  
            meet general AFDC-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) requirements if  
            the nonminor youth has signed a voluntary mutual  
            agreement and meets one or more of the following  
            requirements:
                     The nonminor is completing a high school  
                 education or a program leading to an equivalent  
                 credential;
                     The nonminor is enrolled in a postsecondary or  
                 vocational education program;
                     The nonminor is participating in a program or  
                 activity designed to promote, or remove barriers to,  
                 employment;
                     The nonminor is employed at least 80 hours per  
                 month;
                     The nonminor is incapable of doing any of these  
                 activities due to a medical condition and the  
                 incapacity is supported by regularly updated  
                 information in the case plan of the nonminor  
                 dependent. (WIC 11403 (b))


          1)Provides for the development of a shared responsibility  
            plan when the child of a teen parent is not subject to  
            the jurisdiction of the dependency court but is in the  
            full or partial physical custody of the teen parent.  
            States that the plan shall be developed between the teen  
            parent, caregiver, and a representative of the county  
            child welfare agency or probation department, and in the  
            case of a certified home, a representative of the agency  
            providing direct and immediate supervision to the  
            caregiver. (WIC 16501.25(b) (1))  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageC


          


          2)Defines teen parent to include a nonminor dependent  
            parent who is living in a whole family foster home and is  
            eligible for AFDC-FC or Kin-GAP payments. (WIC 16501.25  
            (a))


          3)Provides that the plan shall outline, with as much  
            specificity as is practicable, the duties, rights, and  
            responsibilities of both the teen parent and the  
            caregiver with regard to the child, and identify  
            supportive services to be offered to the teen parent by  
            the caregiver or, in the case of a certified home, the  
            agency providing direct and immediate supervision to the  
            caregiver, or both. (WIC 16501.25(b) 3))


          4)Provides that upon the caregiver's submission of the plan  
            to the county child welfare agency or probation  
            department, the foster care payment shall be increased by  
            $200 per month. (WIC 11465 (d) (3))


           This bill:


           1.Establishes a similar shared responsibility plan for  
            nonminor dependent parents who are residing in a  
            supervised independent living placement (SILP) to be  
            submitted to the county child welfare agency.


          2.Provides that the parenting support plan shall be  
            developed between the nonminor dependent parent, an  
            identified responsible adult, and a representative of the  
            county child welfare agency.


          3.Provides that the plan shall be designed to preserve and  
            strengthen the nonminor dependent parent family unit to  
            assist the nonminor dependent parent in meeting specified  
            goals and in maintaining a safe, stable and permanent  
            home for the child. Additionally, provides that the plan  
            shall in no way limit the nonminor dependent parent's  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageD


          
            legal right to make decisions regarding the care, custody  
            and control of the child.


          4.Provides that the plan shall be written to identify  
            additional support and to assist the nonminor dependent  
            parent in providing the best care to the child; requires  
            that the plan outline the ways in which the identified  
            responsible adult will assist the nonminor dependent  
            parent with the child and identify supportive services to  
            be offered to the nonminor dependent parent by the  
            identified responsible adult.


          5.Requires that a person who wishes to become an identified  
            responsible adult to a nonminor dependent parent must be  
            at least 21 years of age and undergo a state-level  
            criminal records check conducted through the California  
            Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS). 


          6.Requires that within 10 calendar days, the social worker  
            shall ensure that a fingerprint clearance check of the  
            potential identified responsible adult is initiated  
            through the Department of Justice, as specified.


          7.Requires that the social worker shall also request that  
            the Department of Justice conduct a check of the  
            potential identified responsible adult within the Child  
            Abuse Central Index.


          8.Requires CDSS to convene a working group no later than  
            February 1, 2015 that includes representatives of the  
            County Welfare Directors Association and child welfare  
            advocates to develop an all-county letter specifying the  
            minimum criteria a person must meet in order to serve as  
            an identified responsible adult to a nonminor dependent  
            parent.


                                  FISCAL IMPACT  

          An Assembly Appropriations analysis states there are  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageE


          
          ongoing costs likely in the range of $60,000 to $75,000  
          ($40,000 to $55,000 GF) , depending on caseload, to provide  
          a $200 monthly supplement to parenting foster youth aged 18  
          to 20. CDSS reports there are currently 25 cases in a  
          supervised independent living plan. Social worker time and  
          background checks for the responsible adult are included in  
          the figures.

                            BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION


           According to the author, young parents in the foster care  
          system face both the challenges of being in foster care as  
          well as the challenges of being a young, usually single,  
          parent.  The author states that studies of both groups have  
          found that they will experience higher than average rates  
          of poverty and unemployment and low educational attainment.  
          The author cites one 2013 study, published by the Conrad N.  
          Hilton Foundation, which found that the rates of abuse and  
          neglect among children born to teens with a history of  
          maltreatment are 2 to 3 times higher than the rates of  
          children whose teen mothers had no child welfare  
          involvement. The author states this underscores the need to  
          provide young parents in foster care with adequate support  
          and services to overcome the challenges they face, and to  
          preserve and strengthen the family unit.

          Additionally, the author states that a new placement option  
          available to nonminor dependents remaining in extended  
          foster care, known as a Supervised Independent Living  
          Placement (SILP), enables nonminor dependents to live  
          without a caregiver in an apartment, rented room, dorm  
          room, etc. The author states that, while SILP's provide  
          youth with the independence and autonomy to properly  
          prepare for life after foster care, an unintended  
          shortcoming is the lack of support for custodial parenting  
          non-minor dependents.


          The author states that, unlike most young parents, foster  
          youth who become parents at an early age typically cannot  
          turn to their own parents for emotional support, or for  
          daily or even occasional assistance most young parents  
          receive from their families. Consequently, these young  
          parents are often completely on their own as they struggle  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageF


          
          to balance work, school, and parenting responsibilities.  
          Not surprisingly this stress, lack of resources, and simple  
          lack of experience makes these young parents vulnerable and  
          high risk for poor outcomes.


          California Fostering Connections to Success Act of 2010

          The California Fostering Connections to Success Act of 2010  
          AB 12 (Beall and Bass) Chapter 559, Statutes of 2010)  
          established a statutory framework for foster youth who  
          reach the age of emancipation and who meet certain  
          requirements to voluntarily remain in foster care placement  
          up to age 21. This legislation corresponds with the federal  
          Fostering Connections Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-351),  
          which provided states with the option to receive federal  
          financial participation under kinship-guardianship benefits  
          and/or foster care for eligible nonminor dependents and  
          delinquents. Since the passage of AB 12, the Legislature  
          has annually adopted cleanup measures including AB 212  
          (Beall, 2011), AB 1712 (Beall, 2012), AB 787 (Stone, 2013)  
          to clarify and correctly implement the Act.


          To participate in extended foster care, a youth must  
          fulfill one of the following requirements: Be completing  
          high school or an equivalent program (i.e. GED); be  
          enrolled in college, community college or a vocational  
          education program; be participating in a program designed  
          to remove barriers to employment; be employed at least 80  
          hours a month; or be unable to do one of the above  
          requirements because of a medical condition. 


          Pregnant and Parenting Foster Youth

          Studies indicate that foster youth are particularly  
          vulnerable to becoming parents at an early age. One study  
          of foster youth in Chicago indicated that school  
          performance among these foster youth was poor and that the  
          majority of youth included in the study exited care without  
          a GED or diploma. The same study found that children of  
          foster youth may be especially vulnerable to abuse and  
          neglect - 22 percent of mothers had been investigated for  
          abuse and neglect and 11 percent had a child in foster  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageG


          
          care.<1>


          The study additionally stated that interviewees suggested  
          they would benefit from greater use of peer and adult  
          mentoring and that interviewees observed that when pregnant  
          and parenting foster youth receive ongoing support from an  
          adult caregiver, they tend to participate in services.


          Research shows that teen mothers who stay in school are  
          equally as likely to graduate as teenage girls with no  
          children; however those who drop out before or shortly  
          after childbirth are only half as likely to return to  
          school and graduate as are childless youth who dropout. The  
          same study also indicated that preschool children of teen  
          mothers tend to show some delay of cognitive development as  
          well as more behavior problems and more aggressive behavior  
          than children of older mothers, while adolescent children  
          of teen mothers experience high rates of grade failure,  
          delinquency, and early sexual activity. (Constantine, N.,  
          and Nevarez, C.)<2>


          Also, the study estimated that the annual net costs to  
          California taxpayers related to births to teen mothers was  
          $870 million, and annual net societal costs to the state  
          was $3.6 billion.<3>

          Criminal Record Clearances for Community Care Facilities


          Federal Law pursuant to the Adam Walsh Act (P.L. 109-248)  
          as well as California statute requires background checks to  
          be performed by CDSS of all applicants, licensees,  
          non-client adult residents, volunteers under certain  
          -------------------------


          <1>  
          http://www.chapinhall.org/sites/default/files/Pregnant_Foste 
          r_Youth_final_081109.pdf


          <2> http://teenbirths.phi.org


          <3> Ibid.




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageH


          
          conditions and employees of community care facilities,  
          including foster homes, residential care facilities for the  
          elderly and child care facilities and homes who have  
          contact with clients. The Caregiver Background Check Bureau  
          (CBCB) was established in 1992 to review criminal history  
          information as well as possible matches in the Child Abuse  
          Central Index (CACI) and to render decisions for state  
          licensed community care facilities and for the TrustLine  
          Registry.<4>


          If a criminal record check shows that an individual has  
          been convicted of any crime other than a minor traffic  
          violation, the individual is not permitted to work or be  
          present in any community care facility unless they receive  
          a written criminal record exemption from CDSS (or the  
          county, if it is the licensing entity). The department also  
          is required to examine arrest records to determine if the  
          arrests are for "referable crimes" that require  
          investigation by the bureau; referable crimes are of such  
          severity that an arrest-only nonetheless warrants an  
          investigation by the department to ensure the safety of  
          residents of community care facilities.


          This bill establishes a state approved mentoring  
          relationship with a nonminor dependent parent, and ensures  
          that the responsible adult received a criminal record  
          check. 


                                     COMMENTS

           The background check provisions of this bill reference a  
          process used for counties to place children who have been  
          removed from their homes into emergency relative  
          placements. The CLETS system identified by this bill is a  
          name-check based criminal record system that is not  
          intended for use as a non-emergency background check  
          process. Staff recommends the author amend the bill to  
          require county social workers to conduct a fingerprint  
          based criminal record clearance and to base the clearance  
          -------------------------
          <4> HSC 1522, 1568.08, 1569.17, and 1596.871






          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageI


          
          criteria on the existing foster care structure established  
          pursuant to Health and Safety Code 1522. 

          Specifically, staff recommends the following amendments:


          16501.27. (a)  (1)  For purposes of Section 16501.26, a  
          person who wishes to become an identified responsible adult  
          to a nonminor dependent parent shall   meet the minimum  
          criteria   established pursuant to Section 16501.28, be at  
          least 21 years of age, and undergo a state-level criminal  
          records check to be conducted by an appropriate government  
          agency through the California Law Enforcement  
          Telecommunications System (CLETS) pursuant to Section  
          16504.5. Within 10 calendar days following the criminal  
          records check conducted through CLETS, the social worker  
          shall ensure that a fingerprint clearance check of the  
          potential identified responsible adult is initiated through  
          the Department of Justice to ensure the accuracy of the  
          criminal records check conducted through CLETS and shall  
          review the results of any criminal records check to assess  
          the appropriateness of the person. The Department of  
          Justice shall forward fingerprint requests for  
          federal-level criminal history information to the Federal  
          Bureau of Investigation pursuant to this section.     comply  
          with all of the following requirements:
               (1)    Meet the minimum criteria established pursuant  
                 to Section 16501.28.
               (2)    Be at least 21 years of age.
               (3)    Undergo a criminal records check in accordance  
                 with Section 1522 of the Health and Safety Code.
               (4)    Undergo a Child Abuse Central Index check  
                 pursuant to Section 11170 of the Penal Code.


            (2)  (b) An identification card from a foreign consulate or  
          foreign passport shall be considered a valid form of  
          identification for purposes of conducting a criminal  
          records check and fingerprint clearance check   under this  
          subdivision and under  pursuant to  subdivision  (b).   (a) .


            (b) The social worker shall also request that the  
          Department of Justice conduct a check of the potential  
          identified responsible adult within the Child Abuse Central  





          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageJ


          
          Index pursuant to Section 11170 of the Penal Code.


          (c) (1) If the results of the California and federal  
          criminal records check indicate that the person does not  
          have a criminal record, the individual may serve as an  
          identified responsible adult to a nonminor dependent  
          parent.


          (2) If the results of the criminal records check indicate  
          that the person has a criminal record, the county may issue  
          a criminal records exemption. However, the county shall not  
          grant a criminal records exemption to a person who has been  
          convicted of a crime specified in Section 290 of the Penal  
          Code, for violating Section 245 or 273.5 of the Penal Code,  
          subdivision (b) of Section 273a of the Penal Code, or,  
          prior to January 1, 1994, paragraph (2) of Section 273a of  
          the Penal Code. If a person receives a criminal records  
          exemption pursuant to this paragraph, he or she may serve  
          as an identified responsible adult to a nonminor dependent  
          parent.
            

                                   PRIOR VOTES  

          Assembly Floor      61 - 14
          Assembly Appropriations  13 - 4
          Assembly Human Services    6 - 0





                                    POSITIONS  

          Support:       California Alliance
                         Coalition for Youth

          Oppose:   None received.










          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2668 (Quirk-Silva)      
          PageK


          

                                   -- END --