BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 2726|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2726
          Author:   Daly (D)
          Amended:  3/28/14 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE  :  7-3, 6/24/14
          AYES:  Correa, De Le�n, Galgiani, Hernandez, Lieu, Padilla,  
            Torres
          NOES:  Berryhill, Cannella, Vidak
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/4/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  64-8, 5/23/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    University of California:  real property sales

           SOURCE  :     University of California


           DIGEST  :    This bill revises existing law governing how the  
          University of California (UC) sells real property.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires UC to sell real property  
          valued at more than $500,000 through competitive bidding and  
          provides a list of categorical exemptions.  In addition, UC is  
          required to provide public notice of the sale, as specified, and  
          to accept in public the bid which offers the combination of  
          price and terms deemed to be in the best interest of UC or  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2726
                                                                     Page  
          2

          reject all bids.

          This bill:  

          1. Increases the estimated value of real property, from $500,000  
             to $1 million, that triggers a requirement for UC to sell  
             using a competitive bidding process.

          2. Requires UC to publicly accept the bid which offers the best  
             combination of price, terms and bidder qualifications or  
             reject all bids or proposals. 

          3. Specifies that the bidder qualifications may include factors  
             other than price and terms, such as the bidder's ability to  
             complete the transaction or secure development entitlements.

          4. Gives UC the discretion, in the event a successful bidder  
             fails to perform, to accept from the remaining bids or  
             proposals the one that is most advantageous to UC, rather  
             than start the bid process over.

          5. Adds properties acquired through foreclosure, deed in lieu of  
             foreclosure, and transactions involving property accepted in  
             settlement of a defaulted mortgage or other legal settlement,  
             to the list of transactions currently exempt from competitive  
             bidding. 

           Background
           
          Currently, UC is required to dispose of any real property worth  
          more than $500,000 through a competitive sealed bid process.   
          This bill raises that threshold to $1 million. According to UC,  
          this change will facilitate sales of smaller value properties to  
          a broader range of buyers represented by the traditional real  
          estate brokerage community.  UC notes that brokers representing  
          these properties have estimated that as many as half of  
          potential buyers do not follow through with the transaction  
          because they have to obtain a binding financing commitment and  
          complete other due diligence at their own expense prior to  
          submitting their bid.  This change will allow these properties  
          to be sold through more efficient and conventional means. 

          This bill also enables UC to consider a bidder's qualifications  
          in addition to price and monetary terms when selling real  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2726
                                                                     Page  
          3

          property.  Currently, UC is required to accept the highest price  
          that is offered.  This bill allows UC to consider other relevant  
          factors, such as a potential buyer's financial capacity, ability  
          to secure local zoning changes and other development  
          entitlements, and ability to complete any needed rehabilitation  
          of the property being offered for sale. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No


          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:


           Unknown overall administrative savings to UC, potentially  
            several hundred thousand dollars annually, by exempting sales  
            of properties valued between $500,000 and $1 million from  
            specified public notice, sealed bid, and public acceptance of  
            offers procedures. 

           Unknown overall impact on net UC revenues derived from  
            property sales.  There could be revenue gains by increasing  
            the public notice and sealed bid thresholds, and by  
            streamlining sales of foreclosed properties.  Revenue impacts  
            related to provisions that authorize consideration of bidder  
            qualifications in the sealed bid process are unknown.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/6/14)

          University of California (source)

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    UC is sponsoring this bill to reduce  
          administrative costs associated with the sale or other  
          disposition of UC-owned property.  UC states that the  
          flexibility provided in this bill allows UC to seek the highest  
          and best use of properties, many of which are single family  
          homes that have been donated to UC, within its real estate  
          portfolio.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  64-8, 5/23/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom, Bocanegra,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dababneh,  
            Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2726
                                                                     Page  
          4

            Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hagman, Hall, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan,  
            Perea, John A. P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Weber,  
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NOES:  Allen, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Gorell, Grove, Mansoor,  
            Salas, Waldron
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden, Logue,  
            Patterson, V. Manuel P�rez, Wilk, Vacancy


          MW:d  8/6/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
          



























                                                                CONTINUED