BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2728
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                    AB 2728 (Perea) - As Amended:  April 24, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :  Truck weight fees:  General Fund debt service

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits the use of truck weight fee revenue to pay  
          debt service on transportation-related general obligation bonds  
          (transportation bonds), until January 1, 2019.  Specifically,  
           this bill:  

          1)Prohibits, notwithstanding any other provision of law, weight  
            fee revenue from being transferred from the State Highway  
            Account (SHA) to the Transportation Debt Service Fund or to  
            the Transportation Bond Direct Payment Account, or to any  
            other fund or account.  

          2)Explicitly prohibits weight fee revenue from being used to pay  
            debt service on transportation bonds or from being loaned to  
            the General Fund.  

          3)Provides that these provisions sunset on January 1, 2019.  

           EXISTING LAW  :
           
           1)Imposes weight fees on commercial trucks and directs the  
            revenue to be deposited into the SHA and then transferred to  
            the Transportation Debt Service Fund and the Transportation  
            Bond Direct Payment Account to pay for debt service on  
            transportation bonds.  

          2)Imposes an excise tax on gasoline, comprised of two parts:

             a)   A price-based excise tax the rate of which is calculated  
               to generate revenue equal to what would have been generated  
               had sales and use tax been collected on gasoline.  The  
               current rate is 21.5[ per gallon until July 1, 2014, when  
               it will drop to 18[ per gallon; and,

             b)   The traditional excise tax of 18[ per gallon.  

          3)Directs revenue from the price-based excise tax to be used  
            first to backfill the SHA for weight fees that are diverted  








                                                                  AB 2728
                                                                  Page  2

            for debt service and directs the remaining revenue to be used  
            as follows:

             a)   44% for local streets and roads;

             b)   44% for transportation construction projects identified  
               in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP);  
               and,

             c)   12% for highway maintenance and operations projects, as  
               identified in the State Highway Operations and Protections  
               Program (SHOPP).  

          4)Directs revenue from the traditional excise tax to be used as  
            follows:

             a)   36% to cities and counties for local streets and roads;  
               and,

             b)   64% to the SHA for use as follows:

               i)     Support of the California Department of  
                 Transportation;

               ii)    Maintenance and operation of the state highway  
                 system;

               iii)   The SHOPP; and,

               iv)    Local Assistance.  

               Any remaining funds are split 75% to regional  
               transportation improvement program and 25% to the STIP.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Weight fees generate over $900,000 annually.   
          This bill stops the use of this revenue for General Fund relief  
          for four years.  Consequently, there will undoubtedly need to be  
          a reconciliation with the budget process should this bill be  
          approved.  

           COMMENTS  :  The use of weight fees to pay for debt service is  
          part of a larger budgetary and statutory arrangement referred to  
          as the gas tax swap.  ABX8 6 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 11,  
          Statutes of 2010 enacted the original gas tax swap.  That bill  
          eliminated the sales tax on gasoline and replaced it with an  








                                                                  AB 2728
                                                                  Page  3

          increase in gasoline excise tax designed to generate an  
          equivalent amount of revenue.  Among its many provisions, the  
          original gas tax swap created a new, non-General Fund revenue  
          stream of about $1 billion annually from the new price-based  
          excise tax.  That money was originally used to repay the General  
          Fund's cost of debt service on transportation bonds.  

          Later in 2010, voters approved Proposition 22 which prohibits  
          excise tax revenues from being used to pay debt service on  
          transportation bonds.  As a result of this restriction, excise  
          tax revenue could no longer be used for General Fund relief.  In  
          response, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed a  
          reconstituted gas tax swap, AB 105 (Committee on Budget),  
          Chapter 6, Statutes of 2012.  Under the reenacted gas tax swap,  
          weight fee revenue rather than excise tax revenue is used to  
          provide General Fund relief for debt service on transportation  
          bonds.   

          For 2014-15, debt service on transportation bonds that are  
          eligible for the weight fee offset is expected to exceed $1.1  
          billion and the Governor's budget proposes to use all $958  
          million in weight fees to reimburse the General Fund for these  
          costs.  

          AB 2728 will stop the transfer of funds from the SHA to pay for  
          debt service.  Consequently, it will also stop the need to  
          backfill the SHA with revenue generated by the price-based  
          excise tax.  As a result, over $900 million in weight fees will  
          be distributed using the same formula that revenue that the rest  
          of the price-based excise tax is distributed-that is, a  
          44%/44%/12% split.  

          According to the author, in the three years since the gas tax  
          swap was enacted, the economy improved and voters approved  
          Proposition 30 (2012) which increased sales and income taxes  
          thereby boosting General Fund coffers.  The author believes it  
          is appropriate now to recapture truck weight fee revenue and use  
          it to fix the state's roadway system.  The bill has a 2019  
          sunset date, which coincides with the sunset date in Proposition  
          30.  
          Funding to pay for maintenance and repair on the state highway  
          system comes from taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel.  Revenue  
          from these taxes is declining because of reduced fuel  
          consumption and because of funding shortfalls in the Federal  
          Highway Trust Fund.  The estimated funding available for state  








                                                                  AB 2728
                                                                  Page  4

          highway preservation is $1.8 billion annually; however, the  
          estimated need for rehabilitation and reconstruction of the  
          state highway system is about $7 billion annually.  Funding for  
          local streets and roads is in equally desperate straits.   
          Moreover, these costs estimates are for preservation only.   
          Estimated costs for needed improvements are greater still.  

          AB 2728 will not cure these funding ills.  It will, however,  
          slow the bleeding.  

           Related legislation  :  AB 2652 (Linder), among other provisions,  
          repays transportation loans from the General Fund.  AB 2652 is  
          in the Assembly Budget Committee.  

          AB 2653 (Linder) repeals specific provisions that enacted the  
          weight fee revenue transfer and the SHA backfill.  AB 2653 is in  
          the Assembly Budget Committee.  

          AB 2651(Linder) is nearly identical to this bill except that it  
          becomes operational January 1, 2016 and continues indefinitely.   
          AB 2651 was set to be heard in this committee but was pulled  
          from the hearing at the request of the author who will be added  
          as the joint author to AB 2728.  

          SB 1418 (DeSaulnier) effectively accomplishes the same thing  
          that AB 2651 and AB 2728 do but does it by repealing specific  
          provisions that enacted the weight fee revenue transfer and the  
          SHA backfill.  SB 1418 is scheduled to be heard in Senate  
          Transportation and Housing Committee on April 29, 2014.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Automobile Club of Southern California
          California Alliance for Jobs
          California Trucking Association
          Transportation California
          United Contractors

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
          









                                                                 AB 2728
                                                                  Page  5

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093