BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SCA 17
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SCA 17 (Steinberg)
          As Amended  May 15, 2014
          2/3 vote

           SENATE VOTE  :31-3  
           
           RULES               11-0        APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gordon, Wilk, Brown,      |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow,           |
          |     |Ch�vez, Dababneh,         |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Gonzalez, Hagman,         |     |Calderon, Campos,         |
          |     |Nazarian, Quirk,          |     |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez,  |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Waldron    |     |Holden, Jones, Linder,    |
          |     |                          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY :  Upon voter approval, amends the California  
          Constitution (Constitution) to allow each house of the  
          Legislature to suspend a Member and deem the salary and benefits  
          of that Member to be forfeited.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Provides that each house may, by a vote of two-thirds of its  
            membership, suspend a Member and deem the salary and benefits  
            of the Member to be forfeited for all or part of the period of  
            the suspension.  The motion or resolution must contain  
            findings and declarations setting forth the basis for the  
            suspension.

          2)Prohibits a suspended Member from exercising any of the  
            rights, privileges, duties, or powers of his or her office, or  
            from utilizing any resources of the Legislature while the  
            suspension is in effect.  If the motion or resolution imposing  
            the suspension does not specify the date upon which the  
            suspension ends, this bill requires a vote of two-thirds of  
            the membership of the house to remove the suspension.

           EXISTING LAW  :  The California Constitution provides that each  
          house of the Legislature shall judge the qualifications and  
          elections of its Members and may expel a Member by a vote of  
          two-thirds of the membership of the house.  The Constitution  








                                                                  SCA 17
                                                                  Page  2


          further charges the California Citizens Compensation Commission  
          (Commission) with the responsibility to establish the annual  
          salary and benefits of all state officers, and provides that the  
          salary of an elected state officer may not be reduced during  
          his/her term of office.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)One-time ballot printing/mailing costs of approximately  
            $275,000 to $550,000 (General Fund).

          2)Potential salary savings of tens of thousands of dollars  
            depending on suspensions (General Fund).

           COMMENTS  :   

          Author's statement.  "Under current law, the Senate and Assembly  
          may suspend the authority of its respective Members to exercise  
          the privileges of the office for a fixed, limited period of time  
          that is reasonably necessary to preserve the honor, dignity, and  
          efficiency of the house.  However, that power is limited in that  
          the body does not have the power to suspend its Members without  
          pay.  

          "As clearly laid out in an opinion of the Legislative Counsel, a  
          house of the Legislature may not suspend the salary or benefits  
          of the Senator for the duration of the suspension.  The  
          Constitution vests the [?] Commission with the power to adjust  
          the salary and benefits of Members of the Legislature.  In  
          addition, the Constitution provides that travel and living  
          expenses for Members must be prescribed by a statute passed by  
          two-thirds of the membership of each house.  Finally, the  
          Constitution also provides that the salaries of elected state  
          officers may not be reduced during their term of office.

          "When exercising its inherent and expressed authority to impose  
          a range of sanctions, each house of the Legislature should be  
          empowered to suspend its Members without pay should the  
          circumstances warrant such an action."

          Background.  California Constitution Article IV Section 5,  
          allows the Legislature "to judge the qualifications and  
          elections of its Members and, by rollcall vote entered in the  








                                                                  SCA 17
                                                                  Page  3


          journal, two thirds of the membership concurring, may expel a  
          Member."  Further, Assembly Rule 119 dictates the application of  
          Article IV, Section 5, and Assembly Rule 120 provides procedures  
          for suspending a member convicted of a felony.  Whereas, the  
          constitution provides for permanent expulsion, this bill  
          prescribes procedures for the suspension and removal of the  
          suspension (California Constitution Article IV Section 5).  
          Additionally, this bill addresses the issue of whether the  
          compensation and benefits of a member can be suspended. 
           
           Censure, expulsion, and other disciplinary actions in State  
          Legislatures.  According to the National Association of State  
          Legislatures, the power to discipline and expel Members is  
          inherent to a legislative body.  It originated with the English  
          Parliament in the 16th century, and it was exercised by colonial  
          legislatures prior to American independence.

          The punishments that are usually within a legislature's  
          authority include withdrawal of privileges, fine, imprisonment,  
          reprimand, censure, suspension, and expulsion.  Formal  
          disciplinary procedures generally are regarded as a drastic step  
          reserved for serious situations.  Most often, every effort is  
          made to obtain a satisfactory, but informal, solution to the  
          matter. 

          Although the power to judge Members is available to all  
          legislative bodies, many chambers do not specify the procedures  
          to investigate charges of misconduct.  In addition, the actual  
          reasons for which a lawmaker may be disciplined often are vague  
          or not specified at all.  Disorderly behavior or conduct, listed  
          by 37 states, is the most common basis for disciplinary action.

          State constitutions provide that each house, with the requisite  
          vote, may expel a Member; however, it is a very rare occurrence.  
           Only 17 chambers reported that they had ever taken this very  
          serious action.

          Suspension of Senators Calderon, Wright, and Yee.  On March 28,  
          2014, the Senate approved SR 38 (Steinberg) which suspended  
          Senator Ronald Calderon, Senator Roderick Wright, and Senator  
          Leland Yee until all criminal proceedings currently pending  
          against them have been dismissed. 

          Legislative Counsel opinion.  The vote to suspend the three  








                                                                  SCA 17
                                                                  Page  4


          Senators followed a February 25, 2014 opinion by the Legislative  
          Counsel confirming the Senate may suspend the authority of a  
          Senator to exercise the privileges of the office so long as the  
          suspension is for a fixed, limited period of time and the Senate  
          reasonably determines the suspension to be necessary to preserve  
          the honor, dignity, and efficiency of the Senate.  However, the  
          opinion further stated that the Senate may not suspend the  
          salary or benefits of the Senator for the duration of the  
          suspension given the Constitution authorizes the Commission with  
          the responsibility to establish the annual salary and benefits  
          of Members of the Legislature.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Mukhtar Ali / RLS. / (916) 319-2800 


                                                                FN: 0004568