Amended in Assembly August 18, 2014

Amended in Senate May 22, 2014

Senate Joint ResolutionNo. 23


Introduced by Senators Huff and De León

(Coauthors: Senators Padilla and Steinberg)

(begin deleteCoauthor: end deletebegin insertCoauthors: end insertAssemblybegin delete Memberend deletebegin insert Members Conway, Fong,end insert Waldronbegin insert, and Wieckowskiend insert)

April 10, 2014


Senate Joint Resolution No. 23—Relative to Chinese Americans in California.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SJR 23, as amended, Huff. Chinese Americans in California.

This measure would acknowledge the history of the Chinese in California, would recognize the contributions made to the State of California by Chinese Americans and Chinese immigrantsbegin insert,end insert and would request Congress to adopt resolutions of apology to the Chinese American community for enactment of the Chinesebegin delete Exclusion Lawsend deletebegin insert exclusion lawsend insert.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Chinese Americans have a long and rich history
2in the United States and California; and

3WHEREAS, The many contributions of Chinese Americans,
4both past and present, should be acknowledged and celebrated;
5and

6WHEREAS, Since the late 19th century, Congress enacted
7adverse laws specifically targeting Chinese people on the basis of
8race, most notably the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882; and

P2    1WHEREAS, During this period, growth in the Chinese
2population, combined with economicbegin delete regressionend deletebegin insert regression,end insert led
3to pervasive anti-Chinese sentiments, especially in California and
4the American West; and

5WHEREAS, California’s stance against the Chinese community
6influenced the promotion and passage of thebegin delete Federalend deletebegin insert federalend insert
7 Chinese Exclusion Act; and

8WHEREAS, California lobbied Congress for years to strictly
9prohibit immigration from China, and in 1882, was successful in
10convincing Congress to enact the Chinese Exclusion Act, the first
11federal law ever passed excluding a group of immigrants solely
12on the basis of race or nationality. The Chinese Exclusion Act set
13the precedent for racist foreign and national policy that led to
14broader exclusion laws and fostered an environment of racism that
15quickly led to the Jim Crow laws of the 1880’s, and further
16segregation legislation that would tear our nation apart through
17most of the 20th century; and

18WHEREAS, The Chinese Exclusion Act and later amendments
19to the act not only established barriers exclusively for Chinese
20attempting to enter the country, it also placed discriminatory
21restrictions on those already living in the United States, such as
22requiring Chinese laborers who desired to reenter the country to
23obtain “certificates of return”; and

24WHEREAS, Paradoxically, the very same year that the Chinese
25Exclusion Act was passed, financing abroad was completed for
26the Statue of Liberty. The Statue of Liberty is a sign of freedom
27and democracy and was built and presented to the United States
28at the same time that Chinese Americans and Chinese immigrants
29were being denied freedom and democracy. The Statue of Liberty
30is our nation’s great symbol of hope and justice for all who live,
31and all who wish to live, in the United States of America. While
32the Statue of Liberty was being built, legislators were contradicting
33those very ideals by discriminating against Chinese immigrants
34and lobbying Congress to do the same; and

35WHEREAS, Some congressional legislators did warn against
36the moral bankruptcy of the Chinese Exclusion Act by appealing
37to America’s ideals. Senator George Frisbie Hoar debated against
38the measure before the United States Senate, stating, “Nothing is
39more in conflict with the genius of American institutions than legal
40distinctions based upon race or occupation. The framers of our
P3    1Constitution believed in the safety and wisdom of adherence to
2abstract principles. They meant that their laws should make no
3distinction between men except as were required by personal
4conduct andbegin delete character;” andend deletebegin insert character”; andend insert

5WHEREAS, The Chinese Exclusion Act, which originally
6expired in 1892, was extended by Congress for 10 years in the
7form of the Geary Act and made permanent in 1902. It remained
8in effect until it was repealed in 1943 as a result of the alliance
9forged between China and the United States during World War II.
10The Chinese were once again allowed to immigrate to the United
11States, and shortly thereafter California’s Angel Island ceased to
12be used as a detainment center for Chinese immigrants; and

13WHEREAS, The Chinese Exclusion Act is inconsistent with
14the founding principles of the United States, including that all men
15are created equal; and

16WHEREAS, In 2011, by unanimous consent, the United States
17Senate passed Senate Resolution 201 (S. Res. 201), expressing
18regret for the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and
19other legislation that discriminated against people of Chinese origin
20in the United States; and

21WHEREAS, In 2012, the United States House of Representatives
22unanimously passed House Resolution 683 (H. Res. 683),
23expressing regret for passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882
24and other legislation that discriminated against people of Chinese
25origin in the United States; and

26WHEREAS, The congressional sponsors of H. Res. 683 and S.
27Res. 201 are appreciated and commended for achieving expressions
28of regret for State discriminatory legislation targeting the Chinese
29based upon race; and

30WHEREAS, Congress has never afforded a formal apology for
31the legalized governmental mistreatment marked by the Chinese
32Exclusion Act; and

33WHEREAS, The United States Congress has demonstratedbegin insert thatend insert
34 an apology, not an expression of regret, is most appropriate for
35redressing past transgressions.begin delete Other congressional apologies
36include those for the enactment of discriminatory legislation to
37the Japanese Americans in 1988, the Native Hawaiians in 1993,
38African Americans in 2008 and 2009, and to the Native Americans
39in 2009; andend delete
begin insert Congress has previously apologized for enacting
40discriminatory legislation to Japanese Americans in 1988, to
P4    1Native Hawaiians in 1993, to African Americans in 2008 and 2009,
2and to Native Americans in 2009; andend insert

3WHEREAS, There are important distinctions between an
4expression of regret and an apology; and

5WHEREAS, An expression of regret conveys sorrow for
6hardship or suffering, while an apology acknowledges culpability
7for actions contributing to that hardship or suffering; and

8WHEREAS, It is important that the United States Congress
9make a formal and sincere apology for the enactment of the
10discriminatory laws that adversely affected Chinese Americans,
11so that democracy, justice, and equality for all of its citizens can
12be achieved, and to strengthen the diversity in the United States
13that contributes to the country’s economic, cultural, technological,
14academic, and political growth; now, therefore, be it

15Resolved,begin insert by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
16California, jointly,end insert
That the Legislature requests Congress to adopt
17resolutions of apology to the Chinese American community for
18the enactment of the Chinesebegin delete Exclusion Lawsend deletebegin insert exclusion lawsend insert; and
19be it further

20Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
21this resolution to the President of the United States Senate, the
22Speaker of the House of Representatives, to each Senator and
23Representative from California in the Congress of the United
24States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    97