Senate Joint ResolutionNo. 27


Introduced by Senator Padilla

(Principal coauthor: Senator Wolk)

(Coauthors: Senators DeSaulnier, Hill, and Pavley)

May 28, 2014


Senate Joint Resolution No. 27—Relative to railroad safety.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SJR 27, as introduced, Padilla. Railroad safety: transportation of crude oil.

This measure would urge the United States Department of Transportation and other relevant federal entities to (1) safeguard communities and environmentally sensitive areas from rail accidents involving transportation of crude oil by expediting rail safety reforms, (2) prioritize safety considerations over cost-effectiveness in deliberations about improving the transport of crude oil by rail, (3) mandate, at a minimum, the best practices explained in a 2014 safety initiative, as specified and (4) partner with the Canadian Transportation Agency to improve safety of the North American railroad tank car fleet by swiftly adopting a stricter design standard, and by retrofitting or phasing out tank cars that do not meet that standard.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Recent years have seen a significant increase in
2crude oil production from the Bakken region of North Dakota and
3Montana as well as from the bituminous sands, commonly known
4as tar sands, of Canada. Because crude oil currently is not
5transported to California through pipelines, and because transport
6by barge and truck is relatively expensive, energy companies have
7turned to railroads for distribution of this crude oil; and

P2    1WHEREAS, According to the Association of American
2Railroads, transportation of crude oil by rail has a 65 percent lower
3spill rate than when transported by pipeline, that is, 2.2 vs. 6.3
4gallons spilled per million ton-miles generated. Nonetheless, trains
5carry crude oil throughout the country, including through many
6densely populated and environmentally sensitive areas; and

7WHEREAS, According to the Association of American
8Railroads, roughly 400,000 carloads of crude oil traveled by rail
9to refineries located along the West Coast, Northeast, and Gulf of
10Mexico in 2013. This number is up from 9,500 in 2008, a 4,000
11percent increase; and

12WHEREAS, Because of this rapid change in the energy and
13transportation sectors, safety rules, regulations, and oversight may
14not be aligned with current operations; and

15WHEREAS, The United States Pipeline and Hazardous
16Materials Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad
17Administration jointly initiated Operation Classification to test
18samples, and verify labeling, of crude oil coming from the Bakken
19formation. Bakken crude oil is now understood to be highly
20flammable and more prone to ignite during an accident than
21traditional heavy crude oil; and

22WHEREAS, A series of derailments over the past year have
23raised the profile of crude oil transportation by rail among local,
24state, and federal officials. On July 6, 2013, a runaway train
25carrying crude oil exploded upon derailment in downtown
26Lac-Mégantic, Québec, causing the death of 47 people, the
27evacuation of an entire community, the burning or spilling of 1.5
28million gallons of crude oil, and over one billion dollars
29($1,000,000,000) in damages. Since this tragedy, eight more
30high-profile rail accidents involving transportation of crude oil
31have occurred in four states and three Canadian provinces,
32including, most recently, on April 30, 2014, in Lynchburg,
33Virginia; and

34WHEREAS, According to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
35Safety Administration, the amount of crude oil spilled from tank
36cars last year was more than all crude oil spilled during the four
37decades since the federal government began collecting such data
38(1.15 million gallons in 2013 compared to 800,000 gallons between
391975 and 2012). While the total number of accidents has decreased
P3    1over time, the environmental impact, as measured by gallons spilled
2per million ton-miles, has dramatically increased; and

3WHEREAS, Numerous local and state officials have called for
4a thorough review and improvement of federal standards and
5operational practices as they pertain to the transport of crude oil
6by rail; and

7WHEREAS, On February 21, 2014, United States Secretary of
8Transportation Anthony Foxx and representatives of the country’s
9major freight railroads jointly released new voluntary operating
10practices designed to increase the safety of transporting crude oil
11by rail, including the use of safety technology, additional track
12inspections, lower operating speeds, and improved emergency
13response planning and training; and

14WHEREAS, The United States Department of Transportation
15announced an Emergency Order on May 7, 2014, requiring each
16railroad carrier to notify the emergency response commission in
17each state in which the railroad operates trains transporting at least
18one million gallons of Bakken crude oil. The notification is
19required to include an estimate of qualifying trains traveling
20through each county in the state, describe the crude oil transported,
21provide applicable emergency response information, identify the
22routes over which the crude oil will be transported, and identify
23at least one point of contact at the railroad in the case of an
24accident; and

25WHEREAS, The vulnerability of tank cars to punctures remains
26an important threat to safety, as demonstrated in the most recent
27rail accident involving transportation of crude oil in Lynchburg,
28Virginia, which occurred despite the train traveling 15 miles per
29hour under the voluntary, lower speed limit; and

30WHEREAS, Crude oil is the fastest-growing type of freight
31moving into, out of, or through California. According to the State
32Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission,
33the volume of crude oil imported into California by rail has
34increased from 45,491 barrels in 2009 to 6,169,264 barrels in 2013,
35a 135-fold increase in only four years; and

36WHEREAS, Two major (Class I) railroads are currently moving
37crude oil into California, to receiving terminals in Richmond and
38Bakersfield. Five additional terminals are planned or under
39construction in Bakersfield, Benicia, Pittsburg, San Luis Obispo,
40and Wilmington. In order to reach these terminals, crude oil must
P4    1travel through areas that are densely populated, environmentally
2sensitive, or both; and

3WHEREAS, The State Energy Resources Conservation and
4Development Commission forecasts that with the shift in crude
5oil transportation from ships to trains, and with the addition of
6several rail receiving terminals by 2016, nearly 27 percent of the
7crude oil refined in California will soon be imported by rail,
8compared with the 1 percent of refined crude oil that arrives by
9rail currently; and

10WHEREAS, An increase in tank cars carrying crude oil through
11California would increase the likelihood of an accident and,
12therefore, the risks to human and environmental safety; and

13WHEREAS, The state’s Public Utilities Commission performs
14various rail safety inspections. Increasing inspections can aid the
15safe transportation of crude oil by rail in California, but cannot
16improve the safety of the tank cars themselves; and

17WHEREAS, The Legislature has had two informational hearings
18on the prevention of, and response to, rail accidents involving
19transportation of crude oil, and is currently considering legislation
20to improve first responder preparedness; and

21WHEREAS, Federal law generally preempts states from
22regulating rail transportation, including how hazardous materials,
23such as crude oil, are transported by rail, material disclosures, train
24routing, and tank car design standards; and

25WHEREAS, Despite their hazardous contents, according to the
26American Association of Railroads, 85 percent of tank cars carrying
27flammable liquids, such as crude oil, do not meet the industry’s
28higher voluntary safety standards, established in October 2011;
29and

30WHEREAS, Canadian National Railway and Canadian Pacific
31Railway will charge higher rates for customers moving crude oil
32in tank cars that do not meet the industry’s higher voluntary safety
33standards. As of May 1, 2017, unmodified older tank cars will be
34banned from Canadian railroads; and

35WHEREAS, Canadian regulators said in April 2014 that they
36will work with the United States Department of Transportation to
37determine whether stricter requirements are needed for the North
38American fleet of railroad tank cars intended to carry hazardous
39material, such as crude oil; and

P5    1WHEREAS, The Federal Railroad Administration and the
2Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration released
3a Safety Advisory on May 7, 2014, recommending that offerors
4and rail carriers of Bakken crude oil select and use, for interstate
5shipments, the tank car designs with the highest level of integrity
6reasonably available within their fleet. Further, the agencies advised
7these offerors and carriers to avoid using older, legacy tank cars
8to the extent reasonably practicable; and

9WHEREAS, Tank car manufacturers have called for a uniform,
10lasting design standard to ensure that their current and planned
11products can be sold to both United States and Canadian customers;
12now, therefore, be it

13Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of
14California, jointly,
That the Legislature of the State of California
15urges the United States Department of Transportation and other
16relevant federal entities to safeguard communities and
17environmentally sensitive areas from rail accidents involving
18transportation of crude oil by expediting rail safety reforms; and
19be it further

20Resolved, That the Legislature urges the United States
21Department of Transportation and other relevant federal entities
22to prioritize safety considerations over cost-effectiveness in
23deliberations about improving the transport of crude oil by rail;
24and be it further

25Resolved, That the Legislature urges the United States
26Department of Transportation and other relevant federal entities
27to mandate, at a minimum, the best practices explained in the safety
28initiative announced on February 21, 2014, by Secretary Foxx and
29railroad industry representatives; and be it further

30Resolved, Most importantly, that the Legislature urges the United
31States Department of Transportation and other relevant federal
32entities to partner with the Canadian Transportation Agency to
33improve safety of the North American railroad tank car fleet by
34swiftly adopting a stricter design standard for new tank cars, and
35by retrofitting or phasing out tank cars that do not meet that
36standard; and be it further

37Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
38this resolution to the President and the Vice President of the United
39States, to the United States Secretary of Transportation, to the
40Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, to the
P6    1Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
2Administration, to each Senator and Representative from California
3in the United States Congress, and to the author for appropriate
4distribution.



O

    99