Senate ResolutionNo. 46


Introduced by Senators Beall, Lieu, and Liu

May 15, 2014


Senate Resolution No. 46—Relative to Hong Yen Chang.

P1    1WHEREAS, Hong Yen Chang, reportedly the first Chinese
2immigrant to earn a law degree in the United States and the first
3to be licensed to practice law in any state, was denied entry to the
4State Bar of California because of discriminatory state and federal
5laws; and

6WHEREAS, In 1872, 13-year-old Hong Yen Chang arrived in
7the United States as part of the Chinese Educational Mission, a
8program designed to teach Chinese youth about Western culture;
9and

10WHEREAS, Mr. Chang attended Hartford Public High School
11in Connecticut and then the exclusive Phillips Academy in
12Andover, Massachusetts, and after graduating in 1879, Mr. Chang
13attended Yale College (now Yale University); and

14WHEREAS, When the Chinese government canceled the
15Chinese Educational Mission in 1881, Mr. Chang was forced to
16suspend his studies at Yale and return to China but nevertheless,
17Mr. Chang returned to the United States, enrolled in Columbia
18Law School where he graduated in 1886, and reportedly became
19the first Chinese lawyer educated in the United States; and

20WHEREAS, After graduating from Columbia Law School, Mr.
21Chang applied for admission to the New York State Bar
22Association where Mr. Chang received high marks from the bar
23examiners; and

24WHEREAS, The New York Supreme Court rejected his
25application on the ground that he was not a citizen. Undeterred,
26Mr. Chang reapplied for admission and was successful; and

P2    1WHEREAS, In 1887, the New York Court of Common Pleas
2issued him a naturalization certificate, and the state legislature
3enacted a law permitting him to reapply to the bar and upon his
4admission, Mr. Chang became the only regularly admitted Chinese
5lawyer in the United States; and

6WHEREAS, After his admittance to the New York State Bar
7Association, Mr. Chang applied to the State Bar of California but
8the California Supreme Court denied his admission in the
9unanimous published decision In re Hong Yen Chang, 84 Cal. 163
10(1890); and

11WHEREAS, The California Supreme Court held that Mr.
12Chang’s naturalization certificate was void and that, as a
13noncitizen, he was ineligible for bar membership, despite Mr.
14Chang otherwise satisfying the requirements for bar admission;
15and

16WHEREAS, Because federal law barred Chinese immigrants
17from naturalizing, Mr. Chang could not become a citizen and was
18thus ineligible to practice law in California; and

19WHEREAS, Mr. Chang’s case came in an era of widespread
20discrimination against people of Chinese ancestry and at a time
21when the Chinese Exclusion Act, enacted by Congress in 1882,
22banned Chinese immigration for 10 years and made Chinese
23residents ineligible to naturalize; and

24WHEREAS, Congress extended the Chinese Exclusion Act on
25a number of occasions and the California Constitution in 1879
26dedicated an entire article to restricting the rights of Chinese
27residents; and

28WHEREAS, Notwithstanding the discrimination he faced, Mr.
29Chang went on to lead a distinguished career in banking and
30diplomacy; now, therefore, be it

31Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate
32calls for Mr. Hong Yen Chang’s admittance to the State Bar of
33California posthumously to remedy the injustice he suffered and
34to send a powerful message about the legal profession’s
35commitment to justice, diversity, and inclusion; and be it further

36Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
37this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    99