BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SCR 83
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 10, 2014

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                Bob Wieckowski, Chair
                 SCR 83 (Monning) - As Introduced: February 20, 2014

                                  PROPOSED CONSENT

           SENATE VOTE  :  36-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  CALIFORNIA LAW REVISION COMMISSION: STUDIES

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE CALIFORNIA LAW REVISION COMMISSION BE  
          RE-AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE STUDY OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED TOPICS?

                                      SYNOPSIS
                                          
          This resolution re-authorizes the California Law Revision  
          Commission (CLRC or commission) to study 23 specified topics  
          previously authorized or directed for study by the Legislature,  
          for its report and recommendations to the Legislature.  As with  
          the previous authorizing resolution, SCR 83 requires that before  
          commencing work on any project within the list of topics  
          authorized for study by the Legislature, the commission shall  
          submit a detailed description of the scope of work not only to  
          the chairs and vice chairs of the Senate and Assembly Committees  
          on Judiciary, but also to the chair and vice chair of any policy  
          committee that has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the  
          study.  The measure also expressly approves 2 long-standing  
          commission practices of providing copies of the recommendations  
          to members of a policy committee and having staff available at  
          hearings to explain recommendations and answer questions from  
          committee members.  There is no known opposition.

           SUMMARY  :  Re-authorizes the CLRC to study specific topics.   
          Specifically,  this measure  :  

          1)Re-authorizes the CLRC's study of specified topics (listed  
            below).

          2)Requires that, before commencing work on any project within  
            the calendar of topics the Legislature has authorized or  
            directed the commission to study, the CLRC shall submit a  
            detailed description of the scope of work to the chairs and  
            vice chairs of the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and the  








                                                                  SCR 83
                                                                  Page  2

            Senate Committee on Judiciary, and any other policy committee  
            that has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the study,  
            and if during the course of the project there is a major  
            change to the scope of work, submit a description of the  
            change.

          3)Invites staff of the commission to appear and testify at any  
            committee hearing of a bill to implement a commission  
            recommendation, for the purpose of explaining the  
            recommendation and answering questions posed by committee  
            members, provided that the staff may not advocate for the  
            passage or defeat of the legislation.

          4)Invites the commission to provide a copy of a commission  
            recommendation to each member of a policy committee that is  
            hearing a bill that would implement the recommendation.

           EXISTING LAW  authorizes the California Law Revision Commission  
          to study topics approved by concurrent resolution of the  
          Legislature.  (Government Code Section 8293.)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this measure is keyed  
          non-fiscal.

           COMMENTS  :  The California Law Revision Commission was created in  
          1953 and given the responsibility for a continuing substantive  
          review of California statutory and decisional law.  The  
          commission studies the law to discover defects and anachronisms  
          and recommends legislation to make needed reforms.
           
          The commission's enabling statute recognizes two types of topics  
          the commission is authorized to study:  (1) those that the  
          commission identifies for study and lists in the Calendar of  
          Topics that it reports to the Legislature, and (2) those that  
          the Legislature assigns to the commission directly, by statute  
          or concurrent resolution.  In the past, the bulk of the  
          commission's study topics have come through the first route -  
          matters identified by the commission and approved by the  
          Legislature.  Once the commission identifies a topic for study,  
          it cannot begin to work on the topic until the Legislature, by  
          concurrent resolution, authorizes the commission to conduct the  
          study.  Direct legislative assignments have become much more  
          common in recent years.  Many of the commission's recent studies  
          were directly assigned by the Legislature.









                                                                  SCR 83
                                                                  Page  3

           Reauthorization of topics previously authorized for study  .  The  
          CLRC currently has a list of 23 topics that the Legislature has  
          previously authorized for study.  This measure would reauthorize  
          the CLRC to study the following topics:

          1.Creditors' Remedies
          2.Probate Code
          3.Real and Personal Property
          4.Family Law
          5.Discovery in Civil Cases
          6.Rights and Disabilities of Minors and Incompetent Persons
          7.Evidence
          8.Arbitration
          9.Administrative Law
          10. Attorney's Fees
          11. Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act
          12. Trial Court Unification
          13. Contract Law
          14. Common Interest Developments
          15. Legal Malpractice Statutes of Limitation
          16. Coordination of Public Records Statutes
          17. Criminal Sentencing
          18. Subdivision Map Act and Mitigation Fee Act
          19. Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act
          20. Place of Trial in Civil Cases
          21. Implications of treating a charter school as a public entity
          22. Fish and Game Code
          23. The relationship between mediation confidentiality and  
            attorney malpractice

           Promotion of communications between the commission and the  
          Legislature.   This resolution will provide that prior to  
          commencing work on any project within the list of topics  
          authorized or directed for study by the Legislature, the CLRC  
          shall submit a detailed description of the scope of work to the  
          chairs and vice chairs of the Committees on Judiciary of the  
          Senate and Assembly as well as the chair and vice chair of any  
          policy committee that has jurisdiction over the subject matter  
          of the study, and if during the course of the project there is a  
          major change to the scope of work, submit a description of the  
          change.

          Given the limited resources of the commission which has suffered  
          budget cuts in past years, early communication to the  
          Legislature of proposed topics of study would allow legislative  








                                                                  SCR 83
                                                                  Page  4

          input on whether a particular proposed topic would likely be  
          controversial and thus perhaps avoided by the commission so that  
          it may devote its limited resources to other, more productive  
          studies.

           Prior Legislation  :  SCR 54 (Padilla), Res. Ch. 115, Stats. 2013
          AB 567 (Wagner), Ch. 15, Stats. 2013
          ACR 98 (Wagner), Res. Ch. 108, Stats. 2012
          ACR 49 (Evans), Res. Ch. 98, Stats. 2009
          ACR 35 (Evans), Res. Ch. 100, Stats. 2007
          SCR 15 (Morrow), Res. Ch. 1, Stats. 2006
          SCR 42 (Campbell), Res. Ch. 122, Stats. 2005
          SCR 4 (Morrow), Res. Ch. 92, Stats. 2003
          ACR 125 (Papan), Res. Ch. 167, Stats. 2002
          ACR 123 (Wayne), Res. Ch. 166, Stats. 2002
          SCR 13 (Morrow), Res. Ch. 78, Stats. 2001
          ACR 17 (Wayne), Res. Ch. 81, Stats. 1999
          SCR 65 (Kopp), Res. Ch. 91, Stats. 1998
          SCR 3 (Kopp), Res. Ch. 102, Stats. 1997
          SCR 43 (Kopp), Res. Ch. 38, Stats. 1996

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Law Revision Commission (sponsor)

           Opposition 
           
          None on file

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Drew Liebert / JUD. / (916) 319-2334