P1 1WHEREAS, California’s prosperity is intimately tied to the
2tenacity, innovativeness, and diversity of its people; and
3WHEREAS, The state has made tremendous progress in recent
4years in recognizing undocumented immigrants as valued members
5of society by enacting laws that promote the safety and livelihood
6of immigrant families, including passage of the California DREAM
7Act, the TRUST Act, and the Safe and Responsible Drivers Act;
8and
9WHEREAS, In 1994, exactly 20 years ago, the voters of
10California approved Proposition 187, now considered one of the
11mostbegin delete mean-spiritedend deletebegin insert controversialend insert measures in California’s ballot
12history; and
13WHEREAS, With 59 percent of voters in favor of the initiative
14and 41 percent against it, Proposition 187 was a pernicious and
15unabashed attempt to target and scapegoat immigrants for the
16economic recession in the mid-1990’s; and
17WHEREAS, Although the vast majority of the measure was
18eventually found to be unconstitutional and unenforceable by the
19federal courts, its introduction and approval devastated immigrant
20communities throughout California, pushing undocumented people
21further into the shadows and spreading rampant fear of public
22officials and police; and
P2 1WHEREAS, Proposition 187 is just one example of a long and
2troubled history of targeting and blaming a group of people for
3societal and economic hardships in the United States; and
4WHEREAS, Throughout our history immigrants have had to
5confront hostile environments despite their contributions to our
6economy; and
7WHEREAS, The late 19th century was marked by a series of
8efforts to explicitly limit Chinese migration to the United States,
9particularly to California. Although Chinese immigrants provided
10a needed workforce for the development of the west, including
11construction of the Transcontinental Railroad, growing
12anti-Chinese sentiments fomented fears that mass Chinese
13immigration would threaten American wages and standards of
14living; and
15WHEREAS, These attitudes led to the passage of discriminatory
16laws. A new California Constitution in 1879 explicitly banned
17individuals of Chinese descent from public and corporate
18employment and authorized the state government to determine
19which individuals would be allowed to reside in the state; and
20WHEREAS, Following California’s lead, Congress and
21President Chester A. Arthur approved the Chinese Exclusion Act
22in 1882 to completely restrict Chinese immigration; and
23WHEREAS, Proposition 14 was approved in 1964 to counteract
24the effects of the Rumford Fair Housing Act, which prohibited
25housing discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, sex, marital
26status, physical handicap, or familial status. It was also held
27unconstitutional on the basis that it violated the Equal Protection
28Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution;
29and
30WHEREAS, Voters approved Proposition 21, which would have
31repealed a state law that required the racial integration of schools
32and was ultimately declared unconstitutional by the courts because
33it stood in direct violation of the precedent set by Brown v. the
34Board of Education; and
35WHEREAS, Proposition 187 is the most recent modern example
36of California’s troubled history and relationship with minorities
37and immigrantsbegin delete and of misguided efforts to pass laws that ; and
38dehumanize people simply because they are differentend delete
39WHEREAS, Proposition 187 was proposed and supported by
40anti-immigrant groups; and
P3 1WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilsonbegin delete usedend deletebegin insert championedend insert
2 Proposition 187begin delete to secureend deletebegin insert as a part ofend insert his reelection inbegin delete 1994 byend delete
3begin insert 1994,end insert pursuing a scathing campaignbegin delete that demonizedend deletebegin insert
againstend insert
4 undocumented parents and their children; and
5WHEREAS, Proposition 187 would have specifically barred
6the children of undocumented immigrants from attending public
7schools, required every school district to verify the legal status of
8every child and parent, prohibited colleges and universities from
9accepting undocumented students, and prohibited public agencies
10and publicly funded health care facilities from providing services
11to immigrants suspected of being undocumented; and
12WHEREAS, Proposition 187 would have required teachers,
13doctors, social workers, and law enforcement personnel to verify
14the immigration status of families and report to the former
15Immigration and Naturalization Service any individual reasonably
16suspected of being illegally present in the United States, thereby
17turning civilians into immigration agents; and
18WHEREAS, Proposition 187 served as the unfortunatebegin delete precursor begin insert precedent for theend insert draconian
19to theend deletebegin delete anti-immigrationend delete laws recently
20adopted in Arizona (SB 1070) and Alabama (HB 56)begin delete that, like ; and
21Proposition 187, encourage racial profiling and targeting
22undocumented immigrantsend delete
23WHEREAS, As a society, we have learned time and time again
24that discrimination against minorities ultimately does not benefit
25anyone, but rather hurts our economy and creates social dissonance;
26and
27WHEREAS, That, after 20 years, the Legislature expressly
28acknowledges the harm caused to Californians through passage
29ofbegin delete the discriminatory and xenophobicend delete Proposition 187 and its
30corresponding campaign. Its passagebegin delete marked a reprehensible period serves as a lesson as the Legislature moves
31for California, but itend delete
32forward tobegin delete providedend deletebegin insert provideend insert for the well-being of all Californians,
33regardless of their immigration status, race, ethnicity, religion,
34gender, sexual
orientation, or socioeconomic position; now,
35therefore, be it
36Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate
37recognizes June 23, 2014, the date marking the 20th anniversary
38of the qualification of Proposition 187 for the November 1994
39ballot, as a day to celebrate California’s diversity and a united
40future; and be it further
P4 1Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
2this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
O
98