Amended in Senate August 4, 2014

Senate ResolutionNo. 55


Introduced by Senator Jackson

July 3, 2014


Senate Resolution No. 55—Relative to reproductive health.

begin delete

P1    1WHEREAS, California has always prioritized women’s health
2care; and

end delete
begin delete

3WHEREAS, Any decisions to use contraceptives should be
4made by a woman in consultation with her health care providers
5and not her employer; and

end delete
begin insert

6WHEREAS, The federal Centers for Disease Control and
7Prevention (CDC) maintains that family planning is one of the 10
8great public health achievements of the 20th Century; and

end insert

9WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has previously
10recognized in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
11v. Casey (1992) 505 U.S. 833, 856, that “[t]he ability of women
12to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation
13has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive
14lives”; and

begin insert

15WHEREAS, The United States Congress required health plans
16to cover all Food and Drug Administration-approved methods of
17contraception for women with no out-of-pocket costs as part of
18the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA),
19and nearly 30 million woman across the United States have already
20benefited from that provision; and

end insert
begin insert

21WHEREAS, In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014) 573
22U.S. ____, the Supreme Court concluded that closely-held
23corporations cannot be required to provide contraceptive coverage
P2    1if the corporations’ owners have religious objections to the
2contraception; and

end insert
begin insert

3WHEREAS, Women generally have less disposable income to
4spend on health care services because of the gender pay gap, the
5impact of the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. will
6place additional financial burdens on women already facing the
7inequity of wage discrimination; and

end insert
begin insert

8WHEREAS, Nearly two-thirds of minimum wage workers are
9women, the impact of the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
10Stores, Inc. is expected to fall more heavily on low-income women
11whose access to health care is frequently limited; and

end insert
begin insert

12WHEREAS, As noted in Justice Ginsberg’s dissent, the cost of
13an intrauterine device (IUD) “is nearly equivalent to a month’s
14full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage”; and

end insert
begin insert

15WHEREAS, The lack of access to contraception leads to an
16increase in unintended pregnancies; and

end insert
begin insert

17WHEREAS, According to the CDC’s National Center for Health
18Statistics, more than 99 percent of women use birth control at
19some point in their lives, and approximately 62 percent of all
20women of reproductive age are currently using a contraceptive
21method; and

end insert
begin insert

22WHEREAS, Contraceptive services can serve as a gateway for
23women to enter the health care system and obtain preventive
24medical care; and

end insert
begin insert

25WHEREAS, “The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby . . . would
26deny legions of women who do not hold their employers’ beliefs
27access to contraceptive coverage that the ACA would otherwise
28secure,” as noted in Justice Ginsberg’s dissent; and

end insert
begin insert

29WHEREAS, Any decisions to use contraceptives should be made
30by a woman in consultation with her health care providers and
31not her employer; and

end insert
begin insert

32WHEREAS, According to the Guttmacher Institute, state
33legislatures of the United States introduced over 1,100 anti-choice,
34anti-women legislative proposals in 2011, designed to place
35restrictions on women’s health care and erode protections for
36women and their families, including restricting access to
37contraception, imposing invasive procedures to impede a woman’s
38choice, and allowing for-profit companies to prohibit choice; and

end insert
begin insert

39WHEREAS, It is the goal of some to deprive women of their
40reproductive rights by using the argument of religious freedom
P3    1and ignoring women’s health, which results in the disparate
2treatment of women and undermines individual choice; and

end insert
begin insert

3WHEREAS, There appears to be an organized strategy to upend
4long-standing policy in the areas of contraceptive rights and health
5care rights for women; and

end insert
begin insert

6WHEREAS, California has always prioritized women’s health
7care, including passing the groundbreaking Women’s
8Contraception Equity Act in 1999, which requires employer-based
9health plans that cover a variety prescription drugs to also cover
10a variety of prescription contraceptive methods; and

end insert

11WHEREAS, There is concern that corporations may attempt to
12misuse the precedent set by Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
13begin delete (2014) 573 U.S. ____end delete to unduly restrict women’s health care
14options or seek religious exemptions from other generally
15applicable laws; now, therefore, be it

16Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate
17of the State of California recognizes the critical importance of a
18continued commitment to reproductive health care and access; and
19be it further

begin insert

20Resolved, That the Senate of the State of California urges
21the United States Senate to reconsider and approve Senate Bill
222578, referred to as the Not My Boss’s Business Act, which would
23prevent employers from denying coverage of contraceptives
24regardless of their religious views; and be it further

end insert
begin insert

25Resolved, That the Senate of the State of California reaffirms
26the decision of Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 U.S. 113, which
27acknowledges that reproductive choice is a fundamental right that
28belongs to all women; and be it further

end insert

29Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of
30this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
31States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
32Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative
33from California in the Congress of the United States, and to the
34author for appropriate distribution.



O

    98