BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 110|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                        VETO


          Bill No:  SB 110
          Author:   DeSaulnier (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/8/13
          Vote:     27 - Urgency


          PRIOR SENATE VOTES NOT RELEVANT
           
           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-0, 8/19/13 - See last page for vote
           
          SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM.  :  8-0, 8/22/13 (pursuant  
            to Senate Rule 29.10)
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso, Lara, Liu,  
            Pavley
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gaines, Roth, Wyland

           SENATE FLOOR  :  37-0, 8/26/13
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Block, Calderon, Cannella, Corbett,  
            Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,  
            Knight, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Monning, Nielsen, Padilla,  
            Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wright, Wyland,  
            Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Berryhill, Pavley, Vacancy


            SUBJECT  :    East Span, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Safety  
                      Review Task Force

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill establishes a safety review task force to  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          2

          assess the seismic safety of the East Span of the San  
          Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, exempts the task force and its  
          members from liability, and subjects the task force to open  
          meeting and public record access requirements.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law: 

           1. Provides that state officers and employers are required to  
             do state business within the state unless they obtain prior  
             approval of the Governor to travel out of state. 

           2. Generally provides that a public employee is not liable for  
             an injury resulting from his act or omission where the act or  
             commission was the result of the exercise of the discretion  
             vested in him/her. 

           3. Provides that if an employee or former employee of a public  
             entity makes a timely request that the relevant public entity  
             defend any claim or action against him/her for an injury that  
             arises out of an act or omission occurring within the scope  
             of his/her employment with the public entity, then the public  
             entity shall defend that claim or action.  If the employee or  
             former employee reasonably cooperates in good faith in the  
             defense of claim or action, then the public entity shall pay  
             any judgment, or pay any compromise or settlement amount to  
             that the public entity has agreed. 

           4. Requires, under the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act  
             (Bagley-Keene Act), designated government bodies, boards, and  
             commissions to publicly notice their meetings, prepare  
             agendas, accept public testimony and conduct their meetings  
             in public unless specifically authorized by the Act to meet  
             in closed session. 

           5. Requires, under the Public Records Act (PRA), that all  
             records of a state or local agency be open to inspection or  
             duplication by members of the public, unless exempted by an  
             express provision of the PRA.  Imposes certain requirements  
             on the manner and timeframes within which a state or local  
             agency must respond to a public record request and requires  
             the agency make reasonable efforts to assist a member of the  
             public in making a focused and effective request. 

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          3


           6. Creates the Bay Area Toll Authority (Authority) to  
             administer all toll revenues for the seven state-owned Bay  
             Area toll bridges.

          This bill: 

           1. Establishes the East Span, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge  
             Safety Review Task Force (task force) in state government, to  
             consist of seven members, each appointed to a one-year term  
             as officers of the state and each selected on the basis of  
             qualifications related to expertise and independence. 

           2. Assigns the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) with the  
             responsibility to provide administrative support for the task  
             force. 

           3. Provides compensation to task force members as follows:  the  
             chairperson is to receive $20,000 and each task force member  
             is to receive $16,000.  All members are entitled to  
             reimbursement for expenses, paid for by the State Highway  
             Account (SHA). 

           4. Appropriates $149,000 from the SHA for expenses related to  
             the task force and requires the Authority to reimburse these  
             expenses. 

           5. Requires all task force meetings to be held in California  
             but allows members to conduct meetings outside the state or  
             to participate via conference call, with prior approval by  
             LAO. 

           6. Exempts task force members from provisions of existing law  
             that otherwise prohibit state officers and state employees  
             from working outside California and traveling out of the  
             state without the Governor's approval; authorizes the LAO to  
             approve out-of-state travel. 

           7. Subjects the task force to the requirements of the  
             Bagley-Keene Act and subjects the records of the task force  
             to disclosure under the PRA. 

           8. Directs the task force to assess the anticipated seismic  
             structural performance of East Span of the San  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          4

             Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, as follows: 

              A.    Review the seismic design criteria of the East Span  
                and evaluate the appropriateness of the approach,  
                methodologies, and modeling assumptions used by the  
                Department of Transportation (Caltrans) as they pertain to  
                the ability of the bridge as designed to withstand an  
                earthquake of an appropriate hazard level. 

              B.    Review construction techniques, testing documents, and  
                other pertinent information regarding construction of the  
                bridge and address specific questions that have been  
                raised about construction quality due to possible problems  
                with Caltrans' oversight of the construction contractor  
                and subcontractors. 

              C.    Review and evaluate Caltrans' analyses to assess the  
                impact of construction defects. 

              D.    Evaluate Caltrans' risk assessment to determine if  
                Caltrans appropriately assessed the bridge's ability to  
                withstand an earthquake. 

           1. Provides that the task force may request Caltrans to run  
             models of the bridge and the bridge foundation using various  
             assumptions; additionally requires Caltrans to otherwise  
             cooperate fully with the task force. 

           2. Requires the task force to submit a final written report to  
             the Legislature and the Governor setting forth the results of  
             the task force's review. 

           3. Clarifies that the task force members are covered by  
             existing government immunity provisions and provides that  
             task force members can request Caltrans, as the responsible  
             public entity, to defend against any claim or action based on  
             the task force members' acts or omissions in the scope of  
             their work on the task force.  Any related expenses incurred  
             by Caltrans, including judgments, are to be reimbursed by the  
             Authority. 

           4. Makes this bill's provisions inoperative as of July 1, 2014,  
             and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2015. 


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          5

           5. States legislative intent that the work of the task force  
             should not delay the opening of the new East Span of the Bay  
             Bridge if Caltrans determines at any time that the bridge is  
             safe and ready to open. 

           Comments
           
          Media reports over the last year have raised questions about the  
          structural soundness of the new East Span of the San  
          Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, which is currently under  
          construction and will replace the older East Span of the bridge.  
            Questions were first raised last year specifically about the  
          soundness of the bridge's main tower foundation.  Subsequently,  
          Caltrans reported that its own Seismic Peer Review Panel  
          reviewed pertinent data and confirmed the bridge was safe.  That  
          report, however, did not assuage skeptics.  They challenged the  
          panel members' independence and judgment, arguing that panel  
          members had a vested interest in finding that the bridge was  
          safe given that they had participated in the bridge's design.   
          Critics, therefore, concluded that the panel members' opinions  
          could not be trusted. 

          In response to these media reports, the author, in his capacity  
          as chair of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee,  
          requested that the LAO review Caltrans' and others' foundation  
          reviews and evaluations and confirm that the problems identified  
          by the media were resolved.  Following that hearing, the LAO  
          determined that it did not have the expertise to review the  
          highly technical reviews of the bridge and decided to establish  
          a task force of independent experts to review the reviews  
          originally conducted by the Caltrans and others (including the  
          Federal Highway Administration). 

          The LAO convened the task force earlier this year amidst  
          controversy of its own. For example, soon after task force  
          members were identified, media scrutiny focused on alleged  
          conflicts of interests due to members' ties to Caltrans.  
          Proceeding undeterred, nonetheless, the LAO sought to negotiate  
          final contracts for the task force but found resistance by the  
          task force members who were concerned about the legal liability  
          of findings they may reach in the course of their work on the  
          task force.  As a result, the work of the task force has been  
          stalled until resolution of the immunity issue can be remedied. 


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          6

          The author has introduced this bill in an attempt to do just  
          that-i.e., alleviate task force members' concerns regarding  
          liability so that the work of the task force can continue in  
          earnest.  This bill formally creates the task force in state  
          government and provide task force members with assurances that  
          they will not be held liable for any injury that results from  
          any of their acts or omissions made while serving on the task  
          force.  In addition to its immunity provisions, this bill  
          specifically subjects the task force to open meeting  
          requirements of the Bagley-Keene Act and provides that the  
          records and the documents created or used by the task force are  
          subject to the PRA.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill  
          appropriates $149,000 from the SHA for task force expenses;  
          requires these expenses, and expenses incurred by Caltrans  
          related to defending task force members in a lawsuit, are to be  
          reimbursed by the Authority.




           GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:
           
               "I am returning Senate Bill 110 without my signature. 

               The Legislature formed a task force to review and report on  
               the seismic structural performance of the new east span of  
               the bay bridge.  Work on the review has started.  This bill  
               requires that bridge tolls be used to pay to defend and  
               indemnify members of the task force if they are sued for  
               defamation based on their report. 

               Reviewing construction issues about the east span is fully  
               within the Legislature's oversight authority.  It is also  
               fully within the Legislature's authority to defend and  
               indemnify the members of its own task force."

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-0, 8/19/13
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 110
                                                                     Page  
          7

            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier,  
            Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell,  
            Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein,  
            Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin,  
            Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea,  
            Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada,  
            John A. P�rez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harkey, V. Manuel P�rez, Vacancy, Vacancy


          JA:k:n  1/6/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                   ****  END  ****



























                                                                CONTINUED