BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 210 (Hancock)
          As Amended  June 11, 2014
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :25-9  
           
           PUBLIC SAFETY       5-2                                         
           
           -------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Ammiano, Jones-Sawyer,    |
          |     |Quirk, Skinner, Stone     |
          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Melendez, Waldron         |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Revises the criteria for determining eligibility for  
          pretrial release from custody.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Contains legislative findings and declarations regarding  
            pretrial custody.

          2)Revises the criteria the court must consider for determining  
            pretrial release to include the following:

             a)   The protection of the public;

             b)   The nature and circumstances of the charged offense;

             c)   The history and characteristics of the defendant;

             d)   The defendant's prior criminal record, including whether  
               the defendant was on probation, parole, or other form of  
               supervised release at the time of arrest; and,

             e)   The probability of the defendant's appearance in court,  
               including record of past court appearances, or of flight to  
               avoid prosecution.

          3)Specifies that public safety and the victim's safety are the  
            primary consideration.

          4)States that in considering the previous criminal record of the  








                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  2


            defendant and the history and characteristics of the defendant  
            the judge or magistrate may consider the results of an  
            evidence-based pretrial risk assessment instrument that is  
            predictive of public safety and failure to appear.

          5)Authorizes a county sheriff, probation department, or other  
            local agency, with concurrence of the board of supervisors, to  
            employ supervisory staff to make recommendations for release  
            of defendants on their own recognizance.

          6)Requires such an agency to prepare a pretrial investigative  
            report in specified types of cases recommending whether a  
            defendant should be released on his or her own recognizance  
            (OR).  In other cases, the report is discretionary.

          7)Specifies that only one agency shall issue a pretrial  
            investigative report.

          8)Requires the report to include the results of an  
            evidence-based pretrial risk assessment.

          9)Defines "evidence-based pretrial risk assessment" as "the  
            objective, standardized analysis of information about a  
            pretrial defendant in a way that is consistent with and guided  
            by the best available scientific evidence and professional  
            knowledge that measures the defendant's probability of  
            appearing at trial and the potential risk to public safety  
            while pending case disposition."

          10)Authorizes a county sheriff, probation department, or other  
            local agency to employ supervisory staff to monitor released  
            defendants, if it has concurrence of the board of supervisors.

          11)Authorizes the supervisory staff to do any of the following:

             a)   Notify the defendant of court appearance obligations;

             b)   Require the defendant to report periodically by mail,  
               telephone, or personal appearance to verify compliance with  
               release conditions;

             c)   Monitor and assist the defendant with complying with  
               release conditions;









                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  3


             d)   Supervise a defendant placed on home detention, with or  
               without electronic monitoring, as a condition of release;

             e)   Promptly report violations of release conditions to the  
               court; and,

             f)   Provide information to assist any law enforcement  
               officer with detaining a defendant supervised pursuant to  
               this section and for whom a bench warrant has been issued.

           EXISTING LAW : 

          1)Prohibits excessive bail.

          2)States that a person shall be granted release on bail except  
            for the following crimes when the facts are evident or the  
            presumption great:

             a)   Capital crimes;

             b)   Felonies involving violence or sexual assault if the  
               court finds by clear and convincing evidence that there is  
               a substantial likelihood the person's release would result  
               in great bodily harm to others; and,

             c)   Felonies where the court finds by clear and convincing  
               evidence that the person has threatened another with great  
               bodily harm and that there is a substantial likelihood that  
               the person would carry out the threat if released.

          3)Lists several factors that the court must consider in setting,  
            reducing, or denying bail:  the protection of the public; the  
            seriousness of the charged offense; the defendant's prior  
            criminal record; and, the probability of his or her appearing  
            at trial or hearing of the case.  Public safety is the primary  
            consideration.

          4)States that in considering the seriousness of the offense  
            charged, the judge or magistrate shall include consideration  
            of the alleged injury to the victim, and alleged threats to  
            the victim or a witness to the crime charged, the alleged use  
            of a firearm or other deadly weapon in the commission of the  
            crime charged, and the alleged use or possession of controlled  
            substances by the defendant.








                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  4



          5)Requires the court to consider the safety of the victim and  
            the victim's family in setting bail and release conditions for  
            a defendant.

          6)Specifies conditions for a defendant's release on his or her  
            OR.

          7)Authorizes a court, with the concurrence of the board of  
            supervisors, to employ an investigative staff for the purpose  
            of recommending whether a defendant should be released on OR.

          8)States that whenever a court has employed investigative staff  
            for the purpose of recommending whether a defendant should be  
            released on OR, an investigative report shall be prepared in  
            all cases involved in a violent felony listed in Penal Code  
            Section 667.5(c), or a felony violation of driving under the  
            influence and causing bodily injury to another person,  
            recommending whether the defendant should be released on his  
            or her OR.  The report shall include all of the following:

             a)   Written verification of any outstanding warrants against  
               the defendant;

             b)   Written verification of any prior incidents where the  
               defendant has failed to make a court appearance;

             c)   Written verification of the criminal record of the  
               defendant; and,

             d)   Written verification of the residence of the defendant  
               during the past year.

          9)Prohibits the release of a defendant on his or her OR for any  
            violent felony until a hearing is held in open court and the  
            prosecuting attorney is given notice and an opportunity to be  
            heard on the matter.

          10)Provides that a defendant released on bail for a felony who  
            willfully fails to appear in court, as specified, is guilty of  
            a crime.

          11)Specifies that if an on-bail defendant fails to appear for  
            any scheduled court appearance, the bail is forfeited unless  








                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  5


            the clerk of the court fails to give proper notice to the  
            surety or depositor within 30 days, or the defendant is  
            brought before the court within 180 days.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the  
          Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "SB 210 would create an  
          effective framework for managing pretrial population in two  
          ways.  First, it would revise the criteria both for setting bail  
          and determining eligibility for pretrial release.  It would  
          require a court to consider a defendant's ties to the community,  
          current participation in educational or vocational training, and  
          any mental health or drug dependency issues.  It would also  
          require consideration of the circumstances and seriousness of  
          the alleged crime.

          "Second, it would authorize a local government agency to conduct  
          a pretrial investigation report to determine the defendant's  
          potential threat to public safety and probability of making  
          future court appearances.  Any such report must include the  
          results of an evidence-based risk assessment.

          "Some counties have successfully used risk assessment tools.   
          Santa Cruz County has reduced the pretrial detention rate to  
          56%, far below the statewide average.  Outcomes have been  
          positive:  92% of defendants did not reoffend and 89% made all  
          of their court appearances.  Santa Clara County has implemented  
          similar policies with equivalent results.

          "The current bail-dependent system creates a two-tiered pretrial  
          population based solely on income.  Wealthy defendants who can  
          afford bail are released and allowed to return to their homes  
          and jobs.  Defendants who cannot afford bail remain detained."  

           Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion  
          of this bill.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandy Uribe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 


                                                                FN: 0004015









                                                                  SB 210
                                                                  Page  6