BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 355|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 355
          Author:   Beall (D)
          Amended:  8/18/14
          Vote:     21


           SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER COMMITTEE  :  8-1, 4/23/13
          AYES:  Pavley, Cannella, Evans, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Monning,  
            Wolk
          NOES:  Fuller

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/1/13
          AYES:  Wolk, Knight, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 1/23/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters

           SENATE FLOOR  :  32-0, 1/28/14
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Calderon, Cannella,  
            Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Galgiani,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Knight, Leno,  
            Liu, Mitchell, Padilla, Pavley, Roth, Steinberg, Torres,  
            Vidak, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gaines, Lara, Lieu, Monning, Nielsen,  
            Walters, Wright, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 8/25/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Income taxes:  credits

           SOURCE  :     California Council of Land Trusts
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          2



           DIGEST  :    This bill extends the Natural Heritage Preservation  
          (NHP) tax credit program until June 30, 2020, and extends the  
          period of time during which a taxpayer may carry forward any  
          unused NHP tax credit from eight to 15 years.

           Assembly Amendments  extend the period for when a qualified  
          contribution is made for which a tax credit would be allowed;  
          and extend the carryover period for a qualified contribution  
          made on or after January 1, 2015. 

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1.Requires, under the Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit  
            Act of 2000 (Act), the Wildlife Conservation Board (Board) to  
            implement a program under which property, as defined, may be  
            contributed to the state, any local government, as defined, or  
            to any nonprofit organization designated by a local  
            government, based on specified criteria, in order to provide  
            for the protection of wildlife habitat, open space, and  
            agricultural lands.

          2.Allows, under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation  
            Tax Law, a credit against the taxes imposed by those laws in  
            the amount equal to 55% of the fair market value of any  
            qualified contribution, as defined, contributed during the  
            taxable year pursuant to the Act, as provided.

          This bill:

          1.Extends the NHP tax credit program until June 30, 2020. 

          2.Extends the period of time from eight to 15 years during which  
            a donor of a land contribution, made on or after January 1,  
            2015, may claim any unused NHP tax credit, under both the  
            Corporation Tax Law and the Personal Income Tax Law. 

          3.Takes effect immediately as a tax levy.

           Background 
           

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          3

          The Board is a separate and independent board within the  
          Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) with authority and funding  
          to carry out an acquisition and development program for wildlife  
          conservation.  The Board consists of the President of the Fish  
          and Game Commission, the Director of the DFW and the Director of  
          the Department of Finance.

          The Board's main functions are land protection, habitat  
          restoration, and development of wildlife-oriented public access  
          facilities.  To those ends, the Board approves and funds land  
          acquisitions, conservation easement acquisitions, and habitat  
          restoration, enhancement, and public access projects.  

          The Act was intended to foster public/private partnerships to  
          resolve land use and water disputes, assist habitat stewardship,  
          and demonstrate the state's commitment to protect natural  
          resources by rewarding landowners who perceive habitat as an  
          asset rather than a liability.  Consequently, the Act provided  
          up to $100 million in state tax credits for donations of water  
          rights or qualified land (fee title or easement) equal to 55% of  
          the appraised market value.  The donation had to protect  
          wildlife habitat, parks and open space, archaeological  
          resources, agricultural land, or water.  The donation could have  
          been to any department within the Agency, a local government, or  
          a qualified non-profit.  Credit was limited to landowners "net  
          tax" liability.  However, the credit could be carried over up to  
          eight years until the credit was exhausted.  The tax credit  
          program was run through the Board.

          The tax credit program was first implemented in 2001 but was  
          suspended in 2002 because of pressures on the General Fund (GF).  
           In 2005, an amended version of the program was reinstated  
          through June 30, 2008.  Under the amended program, a donation  
          was only eligible for a tax credit if all the lost revenue  
          resulting from the tax credit could have been reimbursed to the  
          GF from another source, such as state bond funds including  
          Proposition 40 and Proposition 50.

          The tax credit was continued in 2009, by, among other things,  
          extending the sunset date from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2015,  
          removing the $100 million cap on the amount of tax credits that  
          can be approved by the Board, and allowing certain fund sources  
          other than bond funds to reimburse the GF for the revenue loss  
          resulting from the award of tax credits.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          4


           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 

          1.Minor and absorbable administration costs to the Board and  
            Franchise Tax Board. 

          2.Estimated GF revenue decreases of $450,000, $1.3 million, and  
            $2.8 million in fiscal year (FY) 2014-15, FY 2015-16, and FY  
            2016-17, respectively, reimbursed from the NHP Tax Credit  
            Reimbursement Account.  The reimbursement results in increased  
            utilization of bond funds or private donations to offset any  
            current GF revenue decrease, however the use of bond funds  
            will result in marginal increased debt service costs and  
            reduced interest revenue.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/25/14)

          California Council of Land Trusts (source)
          California Rangeland Trust
          Land Trust of Santa Cruz County
          Marin Agricultural Land Trust
          Peninsula Open Space Trust
          Sequoia Riverlands Trust
          Trust for Public Land
          Wildlife Heritage Foundation


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to this bill's sponsor,  
          California Council of Land Trusts, "The Natural Heritage  
          Preservation Tax Credit (NHPTC) has protected 8,006 acres with  
          the authorization of $48.5 M in tax credits for a total of 14  
          projects; and, it has delivered high value for the state's  
          dollar.  While this success cannot be overlooked or minimized,  
          not a single eligible entity had taken advantage of the NHPTC  
          since 2005.  Prior to 2005, many landowners were interested but  
          were unable to make it work for them.  The primary reason is  
          that most landowners are simply unable to take advantage of the  
          state tax credit because they lack the state tax liability that  
          would make the tax credit under NHPTC attractive to them.  In  
          contrast, California business entities frequently have state tax  
          liabilities.  In recognition of this mismatch between the  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 355
                                                                     Page  
          5

          realities of landownership and state tax liabilities, SB 355  
          proposes to modify the existing NHPTC so that landowners who are  
          unable to utilize the tax credit can transfer the tax credit to  
          interested corporate entities who can utilize the tax credit."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 8/25/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. P�rez, V.  
            Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Dahle, Mansoor, Vacancy


          RM:k  8/26/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****


















                                                                CONTINUED