SB 368,
as amended, Pavley. begin deleteSpecial education credentialing. end deletebegin insertTeachers: added authorization in special education.end insert
Existing law establishes the Commission on Teacher Credentialing, and authorizes the commission to issue teaching and service credentials, including a special education credential. Existing law also authorizes the commission to grant an added or supplementary authorization to a credentialholder who has met the requirements and standards of the commission for the added or supplementary authorization.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to encourage multiple pathways for credentialholders to add authorizations for special education credentials, and to encourage program sponsors, as defined, to ensure, where possible and appropriate, that credit is offered for prior work experience, knowledge, and coursework. The bill would set forth guidelines and criteria to determine comparability and equivalency for experience, knowledge, and coursework, as specified.
end insertExisting law prescribes requirements for the credentialing and qualifications of special education teachers in the state.
end deleteThis bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation that would provide for an increased number of persons who can become credentialed special education teachers by creating multiple pathways for the training and credentialing of special education teachers in the state.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 44265.2 is added to the end insertbegin insertEducation Codeend insertbegin insert,
2to read:end insert
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage
4multiple pathways for credentialholders to add authorizations for
5special education credentials. It is further the intent of the
6Legislature to encourage program sponsors to evaluate candidates
7individually to ensure that, where possible and appropriate, credit
8is offered for prior experience, knowledge, and coursework.
9(b) Programs accredited by the commission that offer added
10authorizations in special education to credentialholders may
11consider offering comparability for credential candidates pursuant
12to the guidelines set forth in this subdivision. Program sponsors
13may determine comparability and equivalency for credentialholders
14seeking added authorizations for special education
credentials in
15accordance with the following guidelines:
16(1) Decisions regarding comparability are at the discretion of
17the program sponsor.
18(2) Program sponsors have a broad range of possibilities for
19data in considering evidence for comparability.
20(3) Evaluations of evidence for comparability are not required
21to be based on a course-credit model. Evaluations may be
22evidence-based, and reflect the current commission-approved
23standards for education specialist credentials.
24(4) For candidates simultaneously pursuing a degree in addition
25to earning a credential, approved program sponsors may use their
26own institutional processes and procedures for course credit
27evaluations.
28(5) The
evaluation process may be guided by the principles of
29candidate friendliness and candidate responsibility.
30(6) The burden of retrieving, organizing, and reflecting on
31evidence provided for evaluation is on the candidate.
32(7) The comparability evaluation process may be rigorous and
33labor intensive.
P3 1(c) Options used to verify competency may include, but are not
2limited to, the following:
3(1) Examination results.
4(2) Portfolio.
5(3) Performance narrative.
6(4) Field experience.
7(5) Video.
8(6) Transcript.
9(7) Prior learning assessment.
10(8) A review board process.
11(d) When a candidate presents evidence to a program sponsor
12for comparability, the following may be evaluated:
13(1) Whether information is based on current, adopted California
14credential standards, as appropriate to the specific credential
15sought.
16(2) Whether written agreements formulated between the
17candidate and program sponsor are evidence-based, as appropriate
18to the specific credential sought.
19(3) Whether evaluative information presented by the candidate
20is aligned with the California
Standards for the Teaching
21Profession.
22(e) Flexible enrollment may be considered for candidates who
23need minimal work to complete a credential program. Program
24sponsors may explore alternatives for candidate enrollment in the
25program, including, but not limited to, visitor status, concurrent
26enrollment, open university, county or district programs, university
27extension programs, and professional development activities.
28(f) Program sponsors may take advantage of frequent
29collaborations to formalize written agreements concerning
30comparability of coursework or fieldwork. The agreements may
31be created to meet the needs of individual programs or individual
32candidates.
33(g) Prospective candidates may be granted recognition and
34credit for their life and learning experiences through prior learning
35assessment, in which
candidates have the opportunity to
36demonstrate how their experiences and learning are comparable
37to what is required by the standards.
38(h) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
39(1) “Equivalency” means the determination that a given set of
40knowledge, skills, and abilities as reflected in standards have been
P4 1met through coursework, fieldwork, or prior learning experience,
2as determined by an evaluation process.
3(2) “Comparability” means the determination that a candidate
4has demonstrated the essence of a set of knowledge, skills, or
5abilities required by a particular commission program standard
6through another route.
7(3) “Prior learning assessment” means a process through which
8a person develops a portfolio of life experiences,
training, or
9preparation experience that establish the basis for meeting the
10appropriate standards.
11(4) “Program sponsor” means any university-based or local
12educational agency-based program approved by the commission.
It is the intent of the Legislature to enact
14subsequent legislation that would provide for an increased number
15of persons who can become credentialed special education teachers
16by creating multiple pathways for the training and credentialing
17of special education teachers in the state.
O
98