BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 406
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 2, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 406 (Evans) - As Amended: June 18, 2014
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Exempts tribal court judgments, until January 1, 2018, from
the Uniform Foreign Country Monetary Judgments Recognition Act
(UFCMJRA), and instead enacts similar but streamlined
procedures under the Tribal Court Civil Money Judgment Act
(TCCMJA).
2)Requires the California Law Revision Commission (CLRC) to
study the standards for recognition of a tribal court or
foreign court judgment under the TCCMJA and the UFCMJRA and to
report to the Legislature and the Governor by January 1, 2017
its findings and any recommendations for improvement of those
standards.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Likely minor savings in court costs from streamlined
procedures for enforcing tribal court judgments.
2)Absorbable one-time cost to the CLRC for the study and report,
which will likely require the commission to reprioritize its
work on other topics that the Legislature has directed the
commission to study.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the author, "Under existing law, a party
seeking enforcement of a civil tribal court money judgment in
a state superior court currently must do so under the Uniform
Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (UFCMJRA).
SB 406
Page 2
The UFCMJRA process can be costly and time-consuming for both
the parties and the court, in some cases even causing parties
to unnecessarily re-litigate what the tribal court has already
decided.
"This bill proposes to establish the Tribal Court Civil Money
Judgment Act, a new legal framework for seeking enforcement of
tribal court money judgments under procedures that are modeled
upon the simpler procedures applicable to judgments from the
courts of other states, while still applying the principles of
comity currently required for judgments from sovereign
nations. The framework would not alter the legal standards
that state courts apply in recognizing and enforcing tribal
court money judgments, but merely clarify and consolidate the
procedures for doing so into a uniform and streamlined
statutory scheme."
This bill is co-sponsored by the Judicial Council and Blue
Lake Rancheria.
2)Concerns have been expressed that the bill questions tribal
sovereignty and the legitimacy of tribal courts. Conversely,
several opponents believe the bill fails to require sufficient
due process of law in the underlying tribal court proceedings
before the resulting judgments can be enforced in California
courts. In response, the Assembly Judiciary Committee
amendments establish a three-year sunset on the TCCMJA and
require the CLRC, in the meantime, to assess the standards for
recognition of tribal court judgments.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081