BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 419
Page 1
Date of Hearing: July 2, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 419 (Block) - As Amended: June 12, 2014
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote:7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill extends current restitution collection methods to
defendants who have restitution orders and fines that remain
unsatisfied after serving a county jail term not followed by a
period of supervised release.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor administrative collection costs to the state Victims
Compensation and Government Claims Board (board) and local
collections efforts, offset by increased restitution collection.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . Legislative intent is clear that a restitution
obligation should be paid even if payment was not complete at
the conclusion of the criminal sentence. Current law
authorizes the board or a local collection program to enforce
unsatisfied restitution obligations from defendants on any
form of supervised release. Under correctional realignment,
however, a defendant may be released from custody without a
period of supervised release if the judge imposes a full
custody term, rather than a split sentence. Thus, absent
statutory authority, the only alternative for a victim to
collect outstanding restitution in this situation is civil
enforcement.
2)Current law specifies that any portion of a restitution fine
or a victim restitution order that remains unsatisfied after a
defendant is no longer on probation, parole, post release
SB 419
Page 2
community supervision, or mandatory supervision is enforceable
by the board, and authorizes a local collection program to
enforce restitution orders and fines when a defendant is no
longer on probation, PRCS, or mandatory supervision.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081