SB 536,
as amended, Berryhill. begin deleteGovernment tort claims. end deletebegin insertProperty-related services.end insert
The California Constitution, with certain exceptions, conditions the imposition or increase of a property-related fee or charge upon less than a majority of owners of subject parcels submitting written protests, and approval by either a majority vote of the owners of the properties subject to the fee or charge or, under certain conditions, by a 2⁄3 vote of the voters residing in the area affected by the fee or charge.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that a district, as defined, shall not be obligated to provide subsidies to cure any deficiencies in funding of property-related services provided in the district’s jurisdiction under any of certain specified circumstances. This bill would provide that this prohibition would not apply if the district’s governing board had agreed to subsidize the services before the completion of a majority protest proceeding or election, as specified.
end insertExisting law governs the tort liability and immunity of, and claims and actions against, public entities and their officers and employees. A public entity, as defined, is not liable for an injury, except as otherwise provided by statute, whether the injury arises out of an act or omission of the public entity or a public employee or any other person.
end deleteThis bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to this provision.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 53757 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert,
2to read:end insert
(a) A district shall not be obligated to provide subsidies
4to cure any deficiencies in the funding of property-related services
5provided within the district’s jurisdiction, if any of the following
6conditions exist:
7(1) The district’s governing board proposed to impose, extend,
8or increase property-related fees or charges for the services, the
9board fully complied with Section 6 of Article XIII D of the
10California Constitution, and a majority of parcel owners submitted
11a written protest against the proposed imposition, extension, or
12increase, pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 6 of Article XIII D
13of the California Constitution.
14(2) The district’s governing board proposed to impose, extend,
15or increase property-related fees or charges for the services, the
16board fully complied with Section 6 of Article XIII D of the
17California Constitution, and the proposed imposition, extension,
18or increase failed to get voter approval pursuant to subdivision
19(c) of Section 6 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.
20(3) Property-related fees or charges for the services that comply
21with Section 6 of XIII D of the California Constitution were reduced
22or repealed by the voters by an initiative pursuant to Section 3 of
23Article XIII C of the California Constitution.
24(b) Subdivision (a) shall not apply if the district’s governing
25board had undertaken the obligation to subsidize the services
26before the
completion of a majority protest proceeding or election
27described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subdivision (a).
28(c) For purposes of this section, “fully complies with Section 6
29of Article XIII D of the California Constitution” means all of the
30following:
31(1) Revenues derived from the proposed fee or charge do not
32exceed the funds required to provide the property-related service.
P3 1(2) Revenues derived from the fee or charge are not used for
2any purpose other than that for which the fee or charge was
3imposed.
4(3) The amount of the fee or charge imposed on any parcel or
5person as an incident of property ownership does not exceed the
6proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel or person.
7(4) The fee or charge is not imposed for a service unless and
8until that service is actually used by, or immediately available to,
9the property owner in question.
10(5) The fee or charge is not imposed for general government
11services if the service is available to the public at large in
12substantially the same manner it is to property owners.
13(6) The district has identified all parcels upon which the fee or
14charge is proposed and calculated the amount of the fee or charge
15to be imposed upon each identified parcel.
16(7) The district has provided a written notice by mail of the
17proposed fee or charge to the record owner of each identified
18parcel, in conformance with subdivision (c) of Section 6 of
19Article XIII D of the California
Constitution, and provided for all
20required hearings.
21(d) For purposes of this section, “district” shall mean a local
22governmental entity created for the purpose of providing sidewalks,
23streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems, or vector
24control services within its jurisdiction with a governing board that
25has the same members as the board of supervisors for the county
26in the overlapping geographical area.
Section 815 of the Government Code is amended
28to read:
Except as otherwise provided by statute:
30(a) A public entity is not liable for an injury, whether the injury
31arises out of an act or omission of the public entity or a public
32employee or any other person.
33(b) The liability of a public entity established by this part
34(commencing with Section 814) is subject to any immunity of the
35public entity provided by statute, including this part, and is subject
36to any defenses that would be available to the public entity if it
37were a private person.
O
98