SB 596, as amended, Yee. Pupil health: multitiered and integrated interventions pilot program.
Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state, and provides for the establishment of school districts and other local educational agencies to operate these schools and provide instruction to pupils. Under existing law, the Superintendent of Public Instruction is required, among his or her other duties, to serve as the chief executive officer of the State Department of Education.
This bill would require the State Department of Education to establish a 3-year pilot program to encourage inclusive practices that integrate mental health, special education, and school climate interventions following a multitiered framework in 4 schools, as specified. The bill would require thebegin delete departmentend deletebegin insert
State Department of Educationend insert to select schools where at least 60% of the student body is eligible forbegin insert aend insert free or reduced-pricebegin delete meals or free milk in child nutrition programsend deletebegin insert meal programend insert and whose applicationsbegin insert provide an estimate for the amount of funding being requested andend insert detail a model approach that targets the behavioral, emotional, and academic needs of pupils with multitiered and integrated mental health, special education, and school climate interventions. Thebegin delete bill, contingent on the enactment of an appropriation for this purpose, would require the department to provide start-up and evaluation funding to each school participating in the pilot program, andend deletebegin insert
billend insert would require the schools to provide certain information to thebegin delete departmentend deletebegin insert
State Department of Educationend insert in accordance with a comprehensive evaluation plan developed bybegin delete the department andend delete the State Department of Health Care Servicesbegin insert and the State Department of Educationend insert to assess the impact of the pilot program and disseminate best practices. The bill would require thebegin delete departmentend deletebegin insert State Department of Educationend insert to submit a report to the Legislature evaluating the success of the pilot program at the end of the 3-year period.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that pupils
2from all backgrounds and circumstances in California deserve
3adequate behavioral and academic support to achieve their full
4potential. The Legislature further finds and declares all of the
5following:
6(1) Pupils in California face relational and environmental
7stressors that diminish their ability to achieve their full potential.
8Among these complex challenges may be poverty, frequent exposure
9to violence, placement in the foster care system, and other negative
10experiences
that result in chronic stress and trauma. Nearly
11700,000 pupils in California receive special education services,
12and nearly one-in-four youth are living in poverty. Nearly 60,000
13youth are currently placed in foster care and as many as 20 percent
14of youth are in need of mental health interventions.
15(2) Pupils with these stressors are frequently failed by the
16current policies and systems in place, as measured by indicators
17for academic outcomes, social inclusion, emotional development,
18mental health support, and general pupil well-being.
19(A) In California, more than 20 percent of special education
20pupils spend less than 40 percent of their day within their regular
21classroom, an indicator of inclusion, compared to 14 percent of
P3 1special education pupils nationally and a federal target of less
2than 9 percent.
3(B) Only
59 percent of special education pupils graduated high
4school within four years in the 2010-11 fiscal year compared to
576 percent of all pupils.
6(C) Statewide, a recent study found only 58 percent of foster
7youth in grade 12 graduated compared to 85 percent of all youth,
8with nearly 14 percent of foster youth in grade 12 dropping out
9of school.
10(D) Far too often, youth with mental health challenges do not
11receive the services they need. For instance, one study found that
12nearly two-thirds of adolescents who experienced a major
13depressive disorder in the last year did not receive treatment.
14(E) Even by grade 3, low-income pupils perform substantially
15below their higher income peers in areas of social and emotional
16skill, social and emotional development, engagement in school,
17and physical well-being.
18(3) Current funding practices fail to adequately incentivize
19schools to invest in front-end, preventative measures that would
20reduce overall cost of special education.
21(4) Delivery of comprehensive, community-based support and
22resources requires a high level of collaboration between schools,
23school districts, and county mental health agencies.
24(5) Inclusive, multitiered systems of behavioral and academic
25supports are essential to providing high-quality, cost-effective
26special education programs that benefit all pupils.
27(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that, upon demonstrated
28success of the pilot program established pursuant to Section
29124174.7 of the Health and Safety Code, the evaluated models can
30be adopted by a large number of schools to increase
the efficient
31and effective utilization of available community resources in order
32to promote the success of all pupils.
Section 124174.7 is added to the Health and Safety
35Code, to read:
(a) The State Department of Education shall
37establish a three-year pilot program in accordance with this section
38to encourage inclusive practices that integrate mental health, special
39education, and school climate interventions following a multitiered
P4 1framework. As used in this section, “department” means the State
2Department of Education.
3(b) The department shall establish the pilot program in four
4schools that apply to participate through the submission of detailed
5applicationsbegin insert providing estimates for the amount of funding being
6requested for start up and evaluation of the program andend insert
specifying
7their intended models. Geographical distribution shall be ensured
8by locating the pilot program at two schools in northern California
9and two schools in southern California. The department shall select
10schools where at least 60 percent of the student body is eligible
11forbegin insert aend insert free or reduced-pricebegin delete meals or free milk in child nutrition begin insert meal programend insert and whose applications detail a model
12programsend delete
13approach that targets the behavioral, emotional, and academic
14needs of pupils with multitiered and integrated mental health,
15special education, and school climate interventions. In addition to
16reflecting the school’s
specific culture and needs, a school’s model
17shall include all of the following:
18(1) Formalized collaboration with local mental health agencies
19to provide school-based mental health services that are integrated
20within a multitiered system of support.
21(2) Leverage of school and community resources to offer
22comprehensive multitiered interventions on a sustainable basis.
23(3) An initial school climate assessment that includes
24information from multiple stakeholders, including school staff,
25pupils, and families that is used to inform the selection of strategies
26and interventions that reflect the culture and goals of the school.
27(4) A coordination of services team that
considers referrals for
28services, oversees schoolwide efforts, and utilizes data-informed
29processes to identify struggling pupils who require early
30interventions.
31(5) Whole school strategies that address school climate and
32universal pupil well-being, such as positive behavioral interventions
33and supports or the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, as well
34as comprehensive professional development opportunities that
35build the capacity of the entire school community to recognize and
36respond to the unique social-emotional, behavioral, and academic
37needs of pupils.
38(6) Targeted interventions for pupils with identified
39social-emotional, behavioral, and academic needs, such as
P5 1therapeutic group interventions, functional behavioral analysis and
2plan development, and targeted
skill groups.
3(7) Intensive services, such as wraparound, behavioral
4intervention, or one-on-one support, that can reduce the need for
5a youth’s referral to special education or placement in more
6restrictive, isolated settings.
7(c) Contingent on the enactment of an appropriation for this
8purpose in the annual Budget Act or another statute, the department
9shall provide start-up and evaluation funding to each school
10participating in the pilot program in the following amounts:
11(1) Two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in year one.
end delete12(2) Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) in year two.
end delete13(3) One hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) in year three.
end delete14(d)
end delete
15begin insert(c)end insert (1) The State Department of Health Care Services and the
16department shall develop a comprehensive evaluation plan to assess
17the impact of the pilot program and disseminate best practices.
18(2) Outcomes and indicators to be reported, pursuant to this
19subdivision, by schools participating in the pilot project shall
20include, but not necessarily be limited to, those already being
21collected by schools, as well as designated measures of pupil
22well-being, academic achievement, and school engagement and
23attendance.
24(3) (A) The department, in compliance with Section 9795 of
25the Government
Code, shall submit a report to the Legislature at
26the end of the three-year period evaluating the success of the
27program and further recommendations. The department shall make
28the report available to the public, and shall post it on the
29department’s Internet Web site.
30(B) The requirement to submit a report to the Legislature
31imposed under subparagraph (A) is inoperative, pursuant to Section
3210231.5 of the Government Code, four years after the report is
33due.
34(e) The Legislature finds and declares that pupils from all
35backgrounds and circumstances in California deserve adequate
36behavioral and academic support to achieve their full potential.
37The Legislature further finds and declares all of the following:
38(1) Pupils in California face relational and environmental
39stressors that diminish their ability to achieve their full potential.
40Among these complex challenges may be poverty, frequent
P6 1exposure to
violence, placement in the foster care system, and
2other negative experiences that result in chronic stress and trauma.
3Nearly 700,000 pupils in California receive special education
4services, and nearly one-in-four youth are living in poverty. Nearly
560,000 youth are currently placed in foster care and as many as
620 percent of youth are in need of mental health interventions.
7(2) Pupils with these stressors are frequently failed by the current
8policies and systems in place, as measured by indicators for
9academic outcomes, social inclusion, emotional development,
10mental health support, and general pupil well-being.
11(A) In California, more than 20 percent of special education
12pupils spend less than 40 percent of their day within their regular
13classroom, an indicator of inclusion, compared
to 14 percent of
14special education pupils nationally and a federal target of less than
159 percent.
16(B) Only 59 percent of special education pupils graduated high
17school within four years in the 2010-11 fiscal year compared to
1876 percent of all pupils.
19(C) Statewide, a recent study found only 58 percent of foster
20youth in grade 12 graduated compared to 85 percent of all youth,
21with nearly 14 percent of foster youth in grade 12 dropping out of
22school.
23(D) Far too often, youth with mental health challenges do not
24receive the services they need. For instance, one study found that
25nearly two-thirds of adolescents who experienced a major
26depressive disorder in the last year did not receive treatment.
27(E) Even by grade 3, low-income pupils perform substantially
28below their higher income peers in areas of social and emotional
29skill, social and emotional development, engagement in school,
30and physical well-being.
31(3) Current funding practices fail to adequately incentivize
32schools to invest in front-end, preventative measures that would
33reduce overall cost of special education.
34(4) Delivery of comprehensive, community-based support and
35resources requires a high level of collaboration between schools,
36school districts, and county mental health agencies.
37(5) Inclusive, multitiered systems of behavioral and academic
38supports are essential to providing
high-quality, cost-effective
39special education programs that benefit all pupils.
P7 1(f) It is the intent of the Legislature that, upon demonstrated
2success of the pilot program, the evaluated models can be adopted
3by a large number of schools to increase the efficient and effective
4utilization of available community resources in order to promote
5the success of all pupils.
O
95