BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 596|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 596
          Author:   Yee (D), et al.
          Amended:  1/27/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 1/15/14
          AYES:  Liu, Wyland, Block, Correa, Hancock, Hueso, Monning,  
            Torres
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Huff

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 1/15/14
          AYES:  Hernandez, Beall, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Monning, Pavley,  
            Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Anderson, Nielsen

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 1/23/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters


           SUBJECT  :    Pilot program:  Pupil mental health

           SOURCE  :     Seneca Family of Agencies


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the California Department of  
          Education (CDE) to establish a three-year pilot program, as  
          specified, to encourage inclusive practices that integrate  
          mental health, special education, and school climate  
          interventions following a multi-tiered framework.

           ANALYSIS  :    Tiered intervention is an approach to early  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 596
                                                                     Page  
          2

          identification and support of students with learning and  
          behavior needs.  Models of tiered intervention vary but,  
          characteristically, the approach provides struggling students  
          with interventions at increasing levels of intensity to  
          accelerate their learning. Students may receive intervention  
          support from teachers, other personnel, or from specialists  
          partnering with the school.  Many schools voluntarily follow  
          models of tiered interventions to address student needs prior to  
          imposing discipline or making referrals to special education.

          This bill requires the CDE to establish a voluntary three-year  
          pilot program in four schools to encourage model practices of  
          interventions that targets the behavioral, emotional, and  
          academic needs of pupils with multi-tiered and integrated mental  
          health, special education, and school climate interventions.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1. Requires the pilot program to be established in four schools  
             that volunteer to participate, as specified, which propose  
             model approaches that provide preventive, targeted and  
             intensive interventions that target the behavioral, emotional  
             and academic needs of students.

          2. Establishes numerous requirements for participating schools,  
             including formalized collaboration with local mental health  
             agencies to provide school-based mental health services, and  
             targeted interventions for students with identified  
             social-emotional, behavioral and academic needs. Limits  
             participation to two northern California and two southern  
             California schools, and to schools in which 60% or more of  
             students are eligible for a free or reduced-price meal  
             program.

          3. Requires the Department of Health Care Services and CDE to  
             create a comprehensive evaluation and progress indicators,  
             and to disseminate best practices.

          4. Requires the CDE to submit a report to the Legislature at the  
             end of the three-year period evaluating the success of the  
             program and making further recommendations.  

          5. Codifies legislative intent that the models used by  
             participating schools and evaluated by CDE can be adopted by  
             additional schools upon demonstrated success of the pilot  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 596
                                                                     Page  
          3

             program.

          6. Codifies legislative findings and declarations that all  
             students deserve adequate behavioral and academic support,  
             students face many challenges such as poverty, current  
             funding practices do not incentivize preventative measures,  
             and collaboration is needed between schools and county mental  
             health agencies.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  1/27/14)

          Seneca Family of Agencies (source)
          California Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
          California Primary Care Association
          California Psychiatric Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          unaddressed student needs frequently result in more profound  
          behavioral and academic challenges that can necessitate costly,  
          restrictive interventions.  Adding to the difficulty in  
          addressing these challenges is the fragmentation of the  
          education and mental health systems designed to serve struggling  
          youth.  The school setting presents an important opportunity to  
          identify and respond to the comprehensive needs of youth,  
          reducing barriers to access.  Working in partnership with mental  
          health providers, the school community can be empowered with the  
          skills and resources to promote the wellbeing and achievement of  
          all students.


          PQ:d  1/27/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
          






                                                                CONTINUED