Amended in Senate January 13, 2014

Amended in Senate May 14, 2013

Amended in Senate April 22, 2013

Amended in Senate April 10, 2013

Senate BillNo. 792


Introduced by Senator DeSaulnier

begin insert

(Coauthors: Senators Hancock and Hill)

end insert

February 22, 2013


An act to amend Section 65080 of, and to add Sections 66537.1, 66537.2, 66537.3, 66537.4, 66537.6, and 66537.7 to, the Government Code, relating to planning.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 792, as amended, DeSaulnier. Regional entities:begin insert San Franciscoend insert Bay Area.

Existing law creates the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the Bay Area Toll Authority, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, with various powers and duties relative to all or a portion of the 9-county San Francisco Bay Area region with respect to transportation, air quality, and environmental planning, as specified. Another regional entity, the Association of Bay Area Governments, is createdbegin insert under existing lawend insert as a joint powers agency comprised of cities and countiesbegin delete under existing lawend delete with regional planning responsibilities. Existing law provides for a joint policy committee of certain member agencies in this 9-county area to collaborate on regional coordination. Existing law requires regional transportation planning agencies, as part of the regional transportation plan in urban areas, to develop a sustainable communitiesbegin delete strategy pursuant to Senate Bill 375 of the 2007-08 Regular Sessionend deletebegin insert strategy,end insert coordinating transportation, land use, and air quality planning, with specified objectives.

This bill would require thebegin delete Metropolitan Transportation Commission to report biannually to the Legislature and the public at large on the progress in implementing the policies and programs of the sustainable communities strategy. The bill would also require theend deletebegin insert member agencies of theend insert joint policy committee to preparebegin delete a regional organization plan for the affected member agencies. The regional organization plan would includeend delete a plan for consolidating certain functions that are common to the member agencies. Thebegin delete regional organizationend deletebegin insert bill would require theend insert planbegin delete wouldend deletebegin insert toend insert also include a statement relative to the expected reduction of overhead, operation, and management costs. The bill would require a member agency affected by the plan to submit a copy of the plan to its board on or before December 31,begin delete 2014,end deletebegin insert 2015,end insert and would require the member agencies to report to the Senatebegin delete Transportation and Housingend delete Committee onbegin insert Transportation and Housing onend insert the adoption and implementation of the plan on or before December 31,begin delete 2015end deletebegin insert 2016end insert. The bill would also require the joint policy committeebegin delete to develop and adopt public and community outreach and inclusive public participation programs andend delete to maintain an Internet Webbegin delete site. The bill would also require the joint policy committeeend deletebegin insert site containing information relevant to the committee’s activities andend insert to appoint an advisory committee on economic competitiveness with specified members from the business community and other organizations to adopt goals and policies related to the inclusion of economic development opportunities in thebegin delete plans of the member agencies. By imposing new duties on the joint policy committee, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.end deletebegin insert sustainable committees strategy.end insert

begin delete

This

end delete

begin insertTheend insert bill would require the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission to relocatebegin insert to a specified locationend insert.

begin delete

This

end delete

begin insertTheend insert bill wouldbegin insert alsoend insert establish additional requirements for a sustainable communities strategy adopted on or after January 1,begin delete 2014,end deletebegin insert 2015,end insert within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and would impose additional duties relating tobegin delete aend deletebegin insert thatend insert sustainable communities strategy on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, thebegin delete San Franciscoend delete Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.begin insert Among those additional duties, the bill would require the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to convene a public engagement advisory group to assist in the development of a draft public participation plan, as specified. The bill would also require the commission to report biannually to the Legislature and the public on the progress in implementing the policies and programs of the sustainable communities strategy.end insert

begin insert

By imposing new duties on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and other regional entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

end insert

 The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 65080 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:

3

65080.  

(a) Each transportation planning agency designated
4under Section 29532 or 29532.1 shall prepare and adopt a regional
5transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced
6regional transportation system, including, but not limited to, mass
7transportation, highway, railroad, maritime, bicycle, pedestrian,
8goods movement, and aviation facilities and services. The plan
9shall be action-oriented and pragmatic, considering both the
10short-term and long-term future, and shall present clear, concise
11policy guidance to local and state officials. The regional
12transportation plan shall consider factors specified in Section 134
13of Title 23 of the United States Code. Each transportation planning
14agency shall consider and incorporate, as appropriate, the
15transportation plans of cities, counties, districts, private
16 organizations, and state and federal agencies.

17(b) The regional transportation plan shall be an internally
18consistent document and shall include all of the following:

P4    1(1) A policy element that describes the transportation issues in
2the region, identifies and quantifies regional needs, and describes
3the desired short-range and long-range transportation goals, and
4pragmatic objective and policy statements. The objective and policy
5statements shall be consistent with the funding estimates of the
6financial element. The policy element of transportation planning
7agencies with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may
8quantify a set of indicators including, but not limited to, all of the
9following:

10(A) Measures of mobility and traffic congestion, including, but
11not limited to, daily vehicle hours of delay per capita and vehicle
12miles traveled per capita.

13(B) Measures of road and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation
14needs, including, but not limited to, roadway pavement and bridge
15conditions.

16(C) Measures of means of travel, including, but not limited to,
17percentage share of all trips (work and nonwork) made by all of
18the following:

19(i) Single occupant vehicle.

20(ii) Multiple occupant vehicle or carpool.

21(iii) Public transit including commuter rail and intercity rail.

22(iv) Walking.

23(v) Bicycling.

24(D) Measures of safety and security, including, but not limited
25to, total injuries and fatalities assigned to each of the modes set
26forth in subparagraph (C).

27(E) Measures of equity and accessibility, including, but not
28limited to, percentage of the population served by frequent and
29reliable public transit, with a breakdown by income bracket, and
30percentage of all jobs accessible by frequent and reliable public
31transit service, with a breakdown by income bracket.

32(F) The requirements of this section may be met utilizing
33existing sources of information. No additional traffic counts,
34household surveys, or other sources of data shall be required.

35(2) A sustainable communities strategy prepared by each
36metropolitan planning organization as follows:

37(A) No later than September 30, 2010, the State Air Resources
38Board shall provide each affected region with greenhouse gas
39emission reduction targets for the automobile and light truck sector
40for 2020 and 2035, respectively.

P5    1(i) No later than January 31, 2009, the state board shall appoint
2a Regional Targets Advisory Committee to recommend factors to
3be considered and methodologies to be used for setting greenhouse
4gas emission reduction targets for the affected regions. The
5committee shall be composed of representatives of the metropolitan
6planning organizations, affected air districts, the League of
7California Cities, the California State Association of Counties,
8local transportation agencies, and members of the public, including
9homebuilders, environmental organizations, planning organizations,
10environmental justice organizations, affordable housing
11organizations, and others. The advisory committee shall transmit
12a report with its recommendations to the state board no later than
13September 30, 2009. In recommending factors to be considered
14and methodologies to be used, the advisory committee may
15consider any relevant issues, including, but not limited to, data
16needs, modeling techniques, growth forecasts, the impacts of
17regional jobs-housing balance on interregional travel and
18greenhouse gas emissions, economic and demographic trends, the
19magnitude of greenhouse gas reduction benefits from a variety of
20land use and transportation strategies, and appropriate methods to
21describe regional targets and to monitor performance in attaining
22those targets. The state board shall consider the report prior to
23setting the targets.

24(ii) Prior to setting the targets for a region, the state board shall
25exchange technical information with the metropolitan planning
26organization and the affected air district. The metropolitan planning
27organization may recommend a target for the region. The
28metropolitan planning organization shall hold at least one public
29workshop within the region after receipt of the report from the
30advisory committee. The state board shall release draft targets for
31each region no later than June 30, 2010.

32(iii) In establishing these targets, the state board shall take into
33account greenhouse gas emission reductions that will be achieved
34by improved vehicle emission standards, changes in fuel
35composition, and other measures it has approved that will reduce
36greenhouse gas emissions in the affected regions, and prospective
37measures the state board plans to adopt to reduce greenhouse gas
38emissions from other greenhouse gas emission sources as that term
39is defined in subdivision (i) of Section 38505 of the Health and
40Safety Code and consistent with the regulations promulgated
P6    1pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
2(Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health
3and Safety Code).

4(iv) The state board shall update the regional greenhouse gas
5emission reduction targets every eight years consistent with each
6metropolitan planning organization’s timeframe for updating its
7regional transportation plan under federal law until 2050. The state
8board may revise the targets every four years based on changes in
9the factors considered under clause (iii). The state board shall
10exchange technical information with the Department of
11Transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, local
12governments, and affected air districts and engage in a consultative
13process with public and private stakeholders prior to updating these
14targets.

15(v) The greenhouse gas emission reduction targets may be
16expressed in gross tons, tons per capita, tons per household, or in
17any other metric deemed appropriate by the state board.

18(B) Each metropolitan planning organization shall prepare a
19sustainable communities strategy, subject to the requirements of
20Part 450 of Title 23 of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of
21Federal Regulations, including the requirement to utilize the most
22recent planning assumptions considering local general plans and
23other factors. The sustainable communities strategy shall (i)
24identify the general location of uses, residential densities, and
25building intensities within the region, (ii) identify areas within the
26region sufficient to house all the population of the region, including
27all economic segments of the population, over the course of the
28planning period of the regional transportation plan taking into
29account net migration into the region, population growth, household
30formation and employment growth, (iii) identify areas within the
31region sufficient to house an eight-year projection of the regional
32housing need for the region pursuant to Section 65584, (iv) identify
33a transportation network to service the transportation needs of the
34region, (v) gather and consider the best practically available
35scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in
36the region as defined in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section
3765080.01, (vi) consider the state housing goals specified in Sections
3865580 and 65581, (vii) set forth a forecasted development pattern
39for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation
40network, and other transportation measures and policies, will
P7    1reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light
2trucks to achieve, if there is a feasible way to do so, the greenhouse
3gas emission reduction targets approved by the state board, and
4(viii) allow the regional transportation plan to comply with Section
5176 of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7506).

6(C) (i) Within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan
7Transportation Commission, as defined by Section 66502, a
8sustainable communities strategy adopted on or after January 1,
9begin delete2014,end deletebegin insert 2015,end insert shall also include consideration of local and regional
10air quality, sea level rise, priority infrastructure needs, and the
11goals and policies related to economic development opportunities
12and social equity goals pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
1366537.6. The Association of Bay Area Governments shall be
14responsible for clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (v), and (vi) of subparagraph
15(B). The Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall be
16responsible for clauses (iv) and (viii) of subparagraph (B), priority
17infrastructure needs, and the goals and policies related to economic
18development opportunities and social equity goals pursuant to
19subdivision (b) of Section 66537.6. The Bay Area Air Quality
20Management District shall be responsible for criteria pollutants
21and toxic air contaminants. The San Francisco Bay Conservation
22and Development Commission shall be responsible for sea level
23rise. The Association of Bay Area Governments, the Bay Area Air
24Quality Management District, the San Francisco Bay Conservation
25and Development Commission, and the Metropolitan
26Transportation Commission shall jointly be responsible for clause
27(vii) of subparagraph (B) and the adoption of the strategy as a
28whole.

29(ii) Within the jurisdiction of the Tahoe Regional Planning
30Agency, as defined in Sections 66800 and 66801, the Tahoe
31Metropolitan Planning Organization shall use the Regional Plan
32for the Lake Tahoe Region as the sustainable community strategy,
33provided that it complies with clauses (vii) and (viii) of
34 subparagraph (B).

35(D) In the region served by the multicounty transportation
36planning agency described in Section 130004 of the Public Utilities
37Code, a subregional council of governments and the county
38transportation commission may work together to propose the
39sustainable communities strategy and an alternative planning
40strategy, if one is prepared pursuant to subparagraph (I), for that
P8    1subregional area. The metropolitan planning organization may
2adopt a framework for a subregional sustainable communities
3strategy or a subregional alternative planning strategy to address
4the intraregional land use, transportation, economic, air quality,
5and climate policy relationships. The metropolitan planning
6organization shall include the subregional sustainable communities
7strategy for that subregion in the regional sustainable communities
8strategy to the extent consistent with this section and federal law
9and approve the subregional alternative planning strategy, if one
10is prepared pursuant to subparagraph (I), for that subregional area
11to the extent consistent with this section. The metropolitan planning
12organization shall develop overall guidelines, create public
13participation plans pursuant to subparagraph (F), ensure
14coordination, resolve conflicts, make sure that the overall plan
15complies with applicable legal requirements, and adopt the plan
16for the region.

17(E) The metropolitan planning organization shall conduct at
18least two informational meetings in each county within the region
19for members of the board of supervisors and city councils on the
20sustainable communities strategy and alternative planning strategy,
21if any. The metropolitan planning organization may conduct only
22one informational meeting if it is attended by representatives of
23the county board of supervisors and city council members
24representing a majority of the cities representing a majority of the
25population in the incorporated areas of that county. Notice of the
26meeting or meetings shall be sent to the clerk of the board of
27supervisors and to each city clerk. The purpose of the meeting or
28meetings shall be to discuss the sustainable communities strategy
29and the alternative planning strategy, if any, including the key land
30use and planning assumptions to the members of the board of
31supervisors and the city council members in that county and to
32solicit and consider their input and recommendations.

33(F) Each metropolitan planning organization shall adopt a public
34participation plan, for development of the sustainable communities
35strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if any, that includes
36all of the following:

37(i) Outreach efforts to encourage the active participation of a
38broad range of stakeholder groups in the planning process,
39consistent with the agency’s adopted Federal Public Participation
40Plan, including, but not limited to, affordable housing advocates,
P9    1transportation advocates, neighborhood and community groups,
2environmental advocates, home builder representatives,
3broad-based business organizations, landowners, commercial
4property interests, and homeowner associations.

5(ii) Consultation with congestion management agencies,
6transportation agencies, and transportation commissions.

7(iii) Workshops throughout the region to provide the public with
8the information and tools necessary to provide a clear
9understanding of the issues and policy choices. At least one
10workshop shall be held in each county in the region. For counties
11with a population greater than 500,000, at least three workshops
12shall be held. Each workshop, to the extent practicable, shall
13include urban simulation computer modeling to create visual
14representations of the sustainable communities strategy and the
15alternative planning strategy.

16(iv) Preparation and circulation of a draft sustainable
17communities strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if one
18is prepared, not less than 55 days before adoption of a final regional
19transportation plan.

20(v) At least three public hearings on the draft sustainable
21communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and
22alternative planning strategy, if one is prepared. If the metropolitan
23transportation organization consists of a single county, at least two
24public hearings shall be held. To the maximum extent feasible, the
25hearings shall be in different parts of the region to maximize the
26opportunity for participation by members of the public throughout
27the region.

28(vi) A process for enabling members of the public to provide a
29single request to receive notices, information, and updates.

30(G) In preparing a sustainable communities strategy, the
31metropolitan planning organization shall consider spheres of
32influence that have been adopted by the local agency formation
33commissions within its region.

34(H) Prior to adopting a sustainable communities strategy, the
35metropolitan planning organization shall quantify the reduction in
36greenhouse gas emissions projected to be achieved by the
37sustainable communities strategy and set forth the difference, if
38any, between the amount of that reduction and the target for the
39region established by the state board.

P10   1(I) If the sustainable communities strategy, prepared in
2compliance with subparagraph (B) or (D), is unable to reduce
3greenhouse gas emissions to achieve the greenhouse gas emission
4reduction targets established by the state board, the metropolitan
5planning organization shall prepare an alternative planning strategy
6to the sustainable communities strategy showing how those
7greenhouse gas emission targets would be achieved through
8alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional
9transportation measures or policies. The alternative planning
10strategy shall be a separate document from the regional
11transportation plan, but it may be adopted concurrently with the
12regional transportation plan. In preparing the alternative planning
13strategy, the metropolitan planning organization:

14(i) Shall identify the principal impediments to achieving the
15targets within the sustainable communities strategy.

16(ii) May include an alternative development pattern for the
17region pursuant to subparagraphs (B) to (G), inclusive.

18(iii) Shall describe how the greenhouse gas emission reduction
19targets would be achieved by the alternative planning strategy, and
20why the development pattern, measures, and policies in the
21alternative planning strategy are the most practicable choices for
22achievement of the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.

23(iv) An alternative development pattern set forth in the
24alternative planning strategy shall comply with Part 450 of Title
2523 of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal Regulations,
26except to the extent that compliance will prevent achievement of
27the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets approved by the
28state board.

29(v) For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act
30(Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
31Resources Code), an alternative planning strategy shall not
32constitute a land use plan, policy, or regulation, and the
33inconsistency of a project with an alternative planning strategy
34shall not be a consideration in determining whether a project may
35have an environmental effect.

36(J) (i) Prior to starting the public participation process adopted
37pursuant to subparagraph (F), the metropolitan planning
38organization shall submit a description to the state board of the
39technical methodology it intends to use to estimate the greenhouse
40gas emissions from its sustainable communities strategy and, if
P11   1appropriate, its alternative planning strategy. The state board shall
2respond to the metropolitan planning organization in a timely
3manner with written comments about the technical methodology,
4including specifically describing any aspects of that methodology
5it concludes will not yield accurate estimates of greenhouse gas
6emissions, and suggested remedies. The metropolitan planning
7organization is encouraged to work with the state board until the
8state board concludes that the technical methodology operates
9accurately.

10(ii) After adoption, a metropolitan planning organization shall
11submit a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative
12planning strategy, if one has been adopted, to the state board for
13review, including the quantification of the greenhouse gas emission
14reductions the strategy would achieve and a description of the
15technical methodology used to obtain that result. Review by the
16state board shall be limited to acceptance or rejection of the
17metropolitan planning organization’s determination that the strategy
18submitted would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas
19emission reduction targets established by the state board. The state
20board shall complete its review within 60 days.

21(iii) If the state board determines that the strategy submitted
22would not, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission
23reduction targets, the metropolitan planning organization shall
24revise its strategy or adopt an alternative planning strategy, if not
25previously adopted, and submit the strategy for review pursuant
26to clause (ii). At a minimum, the metropolitan planning
27organization must obtain state board acceptance that an alternative
28planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse
29gas emission reduction targets established for that region by the
30state board.

31(K) Neither a sustainable communities strategy nor an alternative
32planning strategy regulates the use of land, nor, except as provided
33by subparagraph (J), shall either one be subject to any state
34approval. Nothing in a sustainable communities strategy shall be
35interpreted as superseding the exercise of the land use authority
36of cities and counties within the region. Nothing in this section
37shall be interpreted to limit the state board’s authority under any
38other provision of law. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted
39to authorize the abrogation of any vested right whether created by
40statute or by common law. Nothing in this section shall require a
P12   1city’s or county’s land use policies and regulations, including its
2general plan, to be consistent with the regional transportation plan
3or an alternative planning strategy. Nothing in this section requires
4a metropolitan planning organization to approve a sustainable
5communities strategy that would be inconsistent with Part 450 of
6Title 23 of, or Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal
7Regulations and any administrative guidance under those
8regulations. Nothing in this section relieves a public or private
9entity or any person from compliance with any other local, state,
10or federal law.

11(L) Nothing in this section requires projects programmed for
12funding on or before December 31, 2011, to be subject to the
13provisions of this paragraph if they (i) are contained in the 2007
14or 2009 Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program,
15(ii) are funded pursuant to Chapter 12.49 (commencing with
16Section 8879.20) of Division 1 of Title 2, or (iii) were specifically
17listed in a ballot measure prior to December 31, 2008, approving
18a sales tax increase for transportation projects. Nothing in this
19section shall require a transportation sales tax authority to change
20the funding allocations approved by the voters for categories of
21transportation projects in a sales tax measure adopted prior to
22December 31, 2010. For purposes of this subparagraph, a
23transportation sales tax authority is a district, as defined in Section
247252 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that is authorized to
25impose a sales tax for transportation purposes.

26(M) A metropolitan planning organization, or a regional
27transportation planning agency not within a metropolitan planning
28organization, that is required to adopt a regional transportation
29plan not less than every five years, may elect to adopt the plan not
30less than every four years. This election shall be made by the board
31of directors of the metropolitan planning organization or regional
32transportation planning agency no later than June 1, 2009, or
33thereafter 54 months prior to the statutory deadline for the adoption
34of housing elements for the local jurisdictions within the region,
35after a public hearing at which comments are accepted from
36members of the public and representatives of cities and counties
37within the region covered by the metropolitan planning
38organization or regional transportation planning agency. Notice
39of the public hearing shall be given to the general public and by
40mail to cities and counties within the region no later than 30 days
P13   1prior to the date of the public hearing. Notice of election shall be
2promptly given to the Department of Housing and Community
3Development. The metropolitan planning organization or the
4regional transportation planning agency shall complete its next
5regional transportation plan within three years of the notice of
6election.

7(N) Two or more of the metropolitan planning organizations
8for Fresno County, Kern County, Kings County, Madera County,
9Merced County, San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County, and
10Tulare County may work together to develop and adopt
11multiregional goals and policies that may address interregional
12land use, transportation, economic, air quality, and climate
13relationships. The participating metropolitan planning organizations
14may also develop a multiregional sustainable communities strategy,
15to the extent consistent with federal law, or an alternative planning
16strategy for adoption by the metropolitan planning organizations.
17Each participating metropolitan planning organization shall
18consider any adopted multiregional goals and policies in the
19development of a sustainable communities strategy and, if
20applicable, an alternative planning strategy for its region.

21(3) An action element that describes the programs and actions
22necessary to implement the plan and assigns implementation
23responsibilities. The action element may describe all transportation
24projects proposed for development during the 20-year or greater
25life of the plan. The action element shall consider congestion
26management programming activities carried out within the region.

27(4) (A) A financial element that summarizes the cost of plan
28implementation constrained by a realistic projection of available
29revenues. The financial element shall also contain
30recommendations for allocation of funds. A county transportation
31commission created pursuant to Section 130000 of the Public
32Utilities Code shall be responsible for recommending projects to
33be funded with regional improvement funds, if the project is
34consistent with the regional transportation plan. The first five years
35of the financial element shall be based on the five-year estimate
36of funds developed pursuant to Section 14524. The financial
37element may recommend the development of specified new sources
38of revenue, consistent with the policy element and action element.

39(B) The financial element of transportation planning agencies
40with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may include a project
P14   1cost breakdown for all projects proposed for development during
2the 20-year life of the plan that includes total expenditures and
3related percentages of total expenditures for all of the following:

4(i) State highway expansion.

5(ii) State highway rehabilitation, maintenance, and operations.

6(iii) Local road and street expansion.

7(iv) Local road and street rehabilitation, maintenance, and
8operation.

9(v) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail expansion.

10(vi) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail rehabilitation,
11maintenance, and operations.

12(vii) Pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

13(viii) Environmental enhancements and mitigation.

14(ix) Research and planning.

15(x) Other categories.

16(C) The metropolitan planning organization or county
17transportation agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall
18consider financial incentives for cities and counties that have
19resource areas or farmland, as defined in Section 65080.01, for
20the purposes of, for example, transportation investments for the
21preservation and safety of the city street or county road system
22and farm-to-market and interconnectivity transportation needs.
23The metropolitan planning organization or county transportation
24agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall also consider
25financial assistance for counties to address countywide service
26responsibilities in counties that contribute toward the greenhouse
27gas emission reduction targets by implementing policies for growth
28to occur within their cities.

29(c) Each transportation planning agency may also include other
30factors of local significance as an element of the regional
31transportation plan, including, but not limited to, issues of mobility
32for specific sectors of the community, including, but not limited
33to, senior citizens.

34(d) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, each
35transportation planning agency shall adopt and submit, every four
36years, an updated regional transportation plan to the California
37Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation.
38A transportation planning agency located in a federally designated
39air quality attainment area or that does not contain an urbanized
40area may at its option adopt and submit a regional transportation
P15   1plan every five years. When applicable, the plan shall be consistent
2with federal planning and programming requirements and shall
3conform to the regional transportation plan guidelines adopted by
4the California Transportation Commission. Prior to adoption of
5the regional transportation plan, a public hearing shall be held after
6the giving of notice of the hearing by publication in the affected
7county or counties pursuant to Section 6061.

8

SEC. 2.  

Section 66537.1 is added to the Government Code, to
9read:

10

66537.1.  

(a) The member agencies of the joint policy
11committee created pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 66536
12shall prepare a plan for consolidating the functions that are common
13to the member agencies, including, but not limited to, personnel
14and human resources, budget and financial services, electronic
15data and communications systems, legal services, contracting and
16procurement of goods and services, public information and
17outreach services, intergovernmental relations, transportation, land
18use, economic, and related forecasting models, and other related
19 activities, as deemed appropriate and feasible, that will further the
20goals of the member agencies and reduce redundancy. The plan
21shall also include a statement as to the expected reduction in the
22cost of overhead and in the cost of operation and management of
23the member agencies.

24(b) On or before December 31,begin delete 2014,end deletebegin insert 2015, end insert a member agency
25affected by the plan shall submit a copy of the plan to its board.

26(c) On or before December 31,begin delete 2015,end deletebegin insert 2016,end insert the member agencies
27shall report to the Senatebegin delete Transportation and Housingend delete Committee
28onbegin insert Transportation and Housing on end insert the adoption and
29implementation of the plan.

begin delete
30

SEC. 3.  

Section 66537.2 is added to the Government Code, to
31read:

32

66537.2.  

The joint policy committee shall develop and adopt
33public and community outreach and inclusive public participation
34policies to govern the development and adoption of the regional
35organization plan as well as regular joint policy committee
36meetings. These policies shall also govern the meetings of member
37agencies, the meetings of standing committees, and meetings of
38ad hoc or other temporary committees. In developing the policies,
39the joint policy committee shall ensure that outreach programs are
40inclusive of limited-English-proficient populations, and utilize all
P16   1available communication technologies, including webcasting and
2social media, print, radio, and television. The joint policy
3committee shall also establish policies for the holding workshops
4of the joint policy committee and the member agencies in the cities
5and counties of the region. The joint policy committee shall provide
6an opportunity for the public to comment on the draft and the final
7recommended policies. The policies shall be adopted on or before
8October 31, 2014.

end delete
9begin insert

begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 66537.2 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert, to
10read:end insert

begin insert
11

begin insert66537.2.end insert  

(a) Prior to initiating public outreach and
12participation efforts for a regional transportation plan update,
13including the sustainable communities strategy pursuant to
14subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of
15Section 65080, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, in
16consultation with the Association of Bay Area Governments, the
17Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the San Francisco
18Bay Conservation and Development Commission, shall issue, for
19public comment, a draft public participation plan to meet the public
20participation requirements under federal law and Section 65080.

21(b) (1) At least 180 days before issuing the draft under
22subdivision (a), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall
23convene a public engagement advisory group to meet at least six
24times before the draft is issued for public comment. Meetings of
25the public engagement advisory group shall be subject to the Ralph
26M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of
27Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code).

28(2) The Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall accept
29nominations for membership on the public engagement advisory
30group from community-based organizations representing
31populations that are traditionally under represented in decision
32making, including minority and low-income populations. Not less
33than 60 percent of the members of the public engagement advisory
34group shall be affiliated with those community-based groups.

35(3) The public engagement advisory group shall be charged
36with all of the following tasks:

37(A) Reviewing the public participation process in connection
38with the development and adoption of the previous regional
39transportation plan and sustainable communities strategy and
40assessing both of the following:

P17   1(i) Strengths and weaknesses.

2(ii) The degree to which the public participation plans were
3implemented, and the degree to which specific implementation
4actions contributed to a robust, inclusive, and transparent process.

5(B) Identifying key decision points in the process by which the
6previous regional transportation plan and sustainable communities
7strategy was developed and adopted, including all of the following:

8(i) Decision points relating to public outreach.

9(ii) Participation and process needs assessment and
10prioritization.

11(iii) Goals and objectives.

12(iv) Targets and performance measures.

13(v) Equity metrics and equity analysis.

14(vi) Scenario development and evaluation.

15(vii) Selection of a preferred alternative.

16(viii) Regional housing needs assessment methodology and
17allocation.

18(ix) Scoping of the environmental impact report.

19(x) Response to comments.

20(xi) Investment and planning tradeoffs.

21(xii) Relevant decision points of other public agencies, such as
22county congestion management agencies, transit operators, the
23Bay Area Partnership Board, cities, and counties.

24(C) Assisting staff in developing a draft public participation
25plan that does all of the following:

26(i) Provides a clear process map, timeline, and description of
27all key decision points, including those described in subparagraph
28(B).

29(ii) Sets forth outreach activities designed to meaningfully inform
30and engage Bay Area residents, including activities targeting
31populations traditionally under represented in regional planning,
32such as minority and low-income populations.

33(iii) Sets forth the role of advisory committees in the development
34and approval of the regional transportation plan update and
35sustainable community strategy.

36(iv) Sets forth the role of other agencies and local jurisdictions
37in the planning process, and prescribes requirements for inclusive
38public engagement and transparency, to which the Metropolitan
39Transportation Commission will hold those agencies and
40jurisdictions accountable.

P18   1(v) Addresses any other priority concerns raised by the public
2engagement advisory group.

end insert
3

SEC. 4.  

Section 66537.3 is added to the Government Code, to
4read:

5

66537.3.  

The joint policy committee shall maintain an Internet
6Web site containing relevant information pertaining to the joint
7policy committee’s activities.

8

SEC. 5.  

Section 66537.4 is added to the Government Code, to
9read:

10

66537.4.  

The joint policy committee shall be subject to the
11Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950)
12of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5).

13

SEC. 6.  

Section 66537.6 is added to the Government Code, to
14read:

15

66537.6.  

(a) The joint policy committee shall appoint an
16advisory committee on economic competitiveness with members
17from the business community, including representatives of small
18businesses and the technology and manufacturing sectors,
19community colleges, public and private universities, labor, local
20governments, community organizations with an interest in
21expanding economic opportunity for low-income populations and
22communities, and other organizations involved with the private
23 economy.

24(b) The joint policy committee, in consultation with the advisory
25committee, shall adopt goals and policies related to the inclusion
26of economic development opportunities in the sustainable
27communities strategy. The goals and policies shall also promote
28amenities that are special to the region and contribute to the
29region’s quality of life. Social equity goals and considerations shall
30be integrated throughout to ensure that low-income populations
31and populations of color share fairly in the benefits and burdens
32of the economic development goals and policies and their
33implementation and includebegin delete strategicsend deletebegin insert strategiesend insert to improve the
34economic conditions and opportunities for all residents with special
35attention given to opportunities available for low-income residents
36and populations of color.

37

SEC. 7.  

Section 66537.7 is added to the Government Code, to
38read:

39

66537.7.  

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall
40report biannually to the Legislature and the public at large on
P19   1progress in implementing the policies and programs of the
2sustainable communities strategy required pursuant to subparagraph
3(B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 and in
4preparing the subsequent sustainable communities strategy.

5

SEC. 8.  

The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development
6Commission shall relocate to 390 Main Street in San Francisco,
7California.

8

SEC. 9.  

 If the Commission on State Mandates determines
9that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement
10to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
11pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
124 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    95