BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 844
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 844 (Pavley)
          As Amended  August 18, 2014
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :35-0  
           
           ELECTIONS           6-0         APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fong, Donnelly, Bonta,    |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow,           |
          |     |Hall Perea, Rodriguez     |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |                          |     |Calderon, Campos,         |
          |     |                          |     |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez,  |
          |     |                          |     |Holden, Jones, Linder,    |
          |     |                          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Secretary of State (SOS) to create an  
          Internet Web site, or use other available technology, to  
          consolidate information about each state ballot measure in a  
          manner that is easy for voters to access and understand, as  
          specified.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Requires the online version of the state ballot pamphlet to  
            contain all of the following:

             a)   For each candidate listed in the pamphlet, a means to  
               access campaign contribution disclosure reports for the  
               candidate that are available online; and, 

             b)   For each state ballot measure listed in the pamphlet, a  
               means to access the consolidated information, described  
               below. 

          2)Requires the SOS to create an Internet Web site, or use other  
            available technology, to consolidate information about each  
            ballot measure in a manner that is easy for voters to access  
            and understand.  Requires the information to include all of  
            the following:









                                                                  SB 844
                                                                  Page  2


             a)   A summary of the ballot measure's content.

             b)   The total amount of reported contributions made in  
               support of and opposition to a ballot measure calculated  
               and updated as specified.

             c)   A current list of the top 10 contributors supporting and  
               opposing a ballot measure, if compiled by the Fair  
               Political Practices Commission (FPPC) pursuant to current  
               law.  

             d)   A list of each committee primarily formed to support or  
               oppose the ballot measure, as described by current law, and  
               a means to access the sources of funding reported for each  
               committee.  

          3)Requires information about the sources of contributions to be  
            updated as new information becomes available to the public  
            pursuant the Political Reform Act (PRA).  

          4)Requires the SOS, if a committee primarily formed to support  
            or oppose a ballot measure receives $1 million or more in  
            contributions for an election, to provide a means to access  
            online information about the committee's top 10 contributors  
            reported to the FPPC as required by existing law.

          5)Requires the FPPC to automatically provide any list of the top  
            10 contributors created pursuant to existing law, and any  
            subsequent updates to that list, to the SOS.  

          6)Requires the ballot pamphlet, for each state measure to be  
            voted upon, to contain, immediately below the analysis  
            prepared by the Legislative Analyst's Office, a printed  
            statement that refers voters to the SOS's Internet Web site  
            for a list of committees primarily formed to support or oppose  
            a ballot measure, and information on how to access the  
            committee's top 10 contributors.

          7)Contains double-jointing language to avoid chaptering problems  
            with SB 1253 (Steinberg) of the current legislative session.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, ongoing General Fund (GF) costs of $130,000 to the  
          SOS for one full-time and one part-time position to regularly  








                                                                  SB 844
                                                                  Page  3


          compile reported contributions and top 10 contributors for each  
          ballot measure, plus one-time GF costs of $50,000 to develop  
          regulations if required.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Surveys conducted by the  
          Public Policy Institute of California have consistently found  
          that more than 80 percent of likely voters support requiring  
          funding disclosure of donations towards ballot initiatives.   
          According to MapLight, a nonprofit elections research  
          organization, in order to find out campaign finance information  
          for Proposition 30 (2012), it took 460 mouse clicks to compile a  
          complete list of contributors for and against the ballot  
          initiative.

          "The average voter does not have the time, nor the expertise to  
          parse through each individual committee to figure out who the  
          top cumulative contributors are for or against each proposition.  
           Without easy-to-access and easy-to-use tools that can identify  
          the top contributors to campaigns for and against ballot  
          initiatives, voters will have a more difficult time making an  
          informed decision about state policy? SB 844 would provide  
          voters with the identities of large financial contributors who  
          pump millions of dollars into campaigns to pass or defeat state  
          ballot initiatives. This information is crucial to ensuring that  
          voters make informed decisions at the ballot box."

          Earlier this year, the Legislature passed and the Governor  
          signed SB 27 (Correa), Chapter 16, Statutes of 2014, which,  
          among other things, requires a committee primarily formed to  
          support or oppose a state ballot measure or state candidate,  
          that raises $1 million or more for an election, to maintain an  
          accurate list of the committee's top 10 contributors, as  
          specified by the FPPC.  In addition, SB 27 requires the current  
          list of the top 10 contributors to be disclosed on the FPPC's  
          Internet Web site and requires the FPPC to update the top 10  
          contributor lists.  SB 27 requires the FPPC to provide the top  
          10 contributor lists to the SOS, upon request of the SOS, for  
          the purpose of posting the contributor lists on the SOS's  
          Internet Web site.  This bill incorporates similar provisions  
          contained in SB 27.  

          California voters passed an initiative, Proposition 9, in 1974  
          that created the FPPC and codified significant restrictions and  
          prohibitions on candidates, officeholders, and lobbyists. That  








                                                                  SB 844
                                                                  Page  4


          initiative is commonly known as the PRA.  Amendments to the PRA  
          that are not submitted to the voters, such as those contained in  
          this bill, must further the purposes of the proposition and  
          require a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature.

          Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion  
          of this bill.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Nichole Becker / E. & R. / (916)  
          319-2094


                                                                 FN:  
                                                                 0004803