BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 894 (Corbett) - Residential care facilities for the elderly:  
          revocation of license.
          
          Amended: May 7, 2014            Policy Vote: HS 3-2, JUD 6-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: May 23, 2014      Consultant: Jolie Onodera
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS AMENDED.


          Bill Summary: SB 894 would revise existing residential care  
          facilities for the elderly (RCFE) license suspension and  
          revocation provisions of law, as follows:
               Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to notify  
              the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman upon  
              the actual or contemplated temporary suspension or  
              revocation of a license.
               Requires additional licensee notices to RCFE residents of  
              temporary suspension or final revocation orders. 
               Expands DSS duties of care to RCFE residents being  
              relocated.
               Authorizes current and former RCFE residents to bring a  
              civil action against any person, firm, partnership, or  
              corporation that owns, operates, establishes, manages,  
              conducts, or maintains a RCFE that violates the rights of  
              the resident. 

          Fiscal Impact (as approved on May 23, 2014): 
              Potentially significant initial and future costs in the  
              high hundreds of thousands of dollars (General Fund/Special  
              Fund*). One-time costs to establish the response plan and  
              protocol would likely be in the low hundreds of thousands of  
              dollars. Future costs would be dependent on the number of  
              residents requiring DSS to provide the expanded duties of  
              care enumerated in the bill in the event of a license  
              suspension or revocation. 
              Unknown, additional state costs, should the DSS seek  
              injunctive relief and damages through the Attorney General  
              for reimbursement of costs from the licensee. 
              Minor fiscal impact to the Department of Aging (CDA) to  
              receive additional notifications from DSS of pending  
              suspension and revocation orders.








          SB 894 (Corbett)
          Page 1


          *Technical Assistance Fund

          Background: This measure is one of a broader set of bills aimed  
          at reforming the oversight, standards, and operations of RCFEs. 

          The Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) of the DSS  
          administers the licensure and oversight of over 7,500 assisted  
          living, board and care, and continuing care retirement homes  
          that are licensed as RCFEs in California. These residences are  
          designed to provide home-like environment housing options to  
          elderly residents who need assistance with activities of daily  
          living but otherwise do not require continuous, 24-hour  
          assistance or nursing care. The RCFE licensure category includes  
          facilities with as few as six beds to facilities with hundreds  
          of residents whose needs may vary widely. 

          In response to recent health and safety issues discovered at  
          facilities licensed by the CCLD, the 2014-15 Governor's Budget  
          proposes a comprehensive plan to reform the CCLD program. This  
          proposal includes an increase of $7.5 million ($5.8 million  
          General Fund) and 71.5 positions to improve the timeliness of  
          investigations, ensure the CCLD inspects all facilities at least  
          once every five years, increase staff training, and establish  
          clear fiscal, program, and corporate accountability. The  
          proposal also increases civil penalties assessed for violations  
          and increases licensing and application fees by 10 percent. The  
          proposed budget for CCLD in 2014-15 is $118 million ($36 million  
          General Fund). This represents an 11 percent increase above  
          estimated 2013-14 total expenditures (37 percent above 2013-14  
          General Fund expenditures).

          This bill was prompted in part by the events that occurred in  
          October 2013 at Valley Springs Manor Residential Care Center in  
          Castro Valley, in which elderly residents were left without  
          adequate care after the owners and paid staff members walked out  
          of the facility while under impending license revocation. The  
          stranded residents were cared for by two unpaid and untrained  
          employees - a cook and a janitor - until 911 calls were made and  
          rescuers arrived to evacuate the residents.

          Proposed Law: This bill would amend existing RCFE license  
          suspension and revocation process provisions of law, as follows:
           Requires DSS to provide the State LTC Ombudsman with a  
            precautionary notice if DSS is reasonably contemplating a  








          SB 894 (Corbett)
          Page 2


            temporary suspension or revocation of any license.
           Prohibits a licensee from accepting new residents or entering  
            into admission agreements for new residents upon receipt of an  
            order to suspend or revoke a license.
           Requires the licensee to provide written notice of license  
            suspension to residents or residents' responsible person as  
            soon as practically possible but not later than within 24  
            hours of receipt of notice.
           Authorizes DSS to secure or permit the licensee to secure, the  
            services of a person or entity, as specified, to manage the  
            day-to-day operations of the facility until the matter is  
            heard, as specified, and for at least 60 days thereafter,  
            subject to specified execution of agreement and documents  
            submitted.
           Deletes the minimum preadmission fee entitling a resident to  
            fee refunds.
           Requires the revoked licensee, within 24 hours (instead of 10  
            days) after all residents have been transferred, to submit a  
            final list of names and new locations of all residents to DSS  
            and local ombudsman program.
           Requires DSS to take any necessary actions to minimize trauma  
            for residents at any time during or following a temporary  
            suspension or revocation of a license, to include:
                  o         Contacting local agency, as specified.
                  o         Contacting residents' relatives, legal  
                    representatives, authorized agents in a health care  
                    directive, or responsible party.
                  o         Assisting in the transfer of residents, and  
                    arranging or coordinating transportation.
                  o         Providing onsite evaluation of residents.
                  o         Arranging for or coordinating care and  
                    supervision.
                  o         Arranging for the distribution of medications,  
                    preparation of meals.
                  o         Assisting in any way necessary to facilitate a  
                    safe transfer of all residents.
                  o         Checking on the status of transferred  
                    residents within 24 hours of transfer.
           Provides that a licensee who fails to comply with all  
            requirements is liable for civil penalties of $500 per  
            violation per day, until the violation has been corrected. 
           Allows current or former RCFE residents to bring a civil  
            action against any person, firm, partnership, or corporation  
            who owns, operates, establishes, manages, conducts, or  








          SB 894 (Corbett)
          Page 3


            maintains an RCFE who violates the rights of a resident, as  
            specified.
           Provides that violators of provisions of this bill would be  
            responsible for the acts of the facility employees and be  
            liable for costs and attorney's fees.

          Related Legislation: SB 1153 (Leno) 2014 would permit the DSS to  
          order a suspension of new admissions to a RCFE under specified  
          conditions. This bill is pending referral to committee in the  
          Assembly.

          The following bills regarding licensing and inspections at  
          community care facilities, and RCFEs specifically, have been  
          introduced this session:
          
          SB 895 (Corbett) RCFEs: annual inspections.
          SB 911 (Block) RCFEs: licensing and training requirements.
          SB 1382 (Block) RCFEs: licensure fees.
          AB 1436 (Waldron) RCFEs: internet posting of inspection reports.
          AB 1523 (Atkins) RCFEs: liability insurance.
          AB 1554 (Skinner) RCFEs: complaint procedures.
          AB 1570 (Chesbro) RCFEs: training requirements.
          AB 1571 (Eggman) RCFEs: disclosure requirements.
          AB 1572 (Eggman) RCFEs: single resident council.
          AB 1899 (Brown) RCFEs: prohibitions on licensure reinstatement.
          AB 2044 (Rodriguez) RCFEs: 24-hour presence of  
          administrator/staff.
          AB 2171 (Wieckowski) RCFEs: residents' rights.

          Staff Comments: This bill expands the actions DSS must take  
          following a temporary suspension or revocation of an RCFE  
          license to include duties such as arranging for or coordinating  
          care and supervision, arranging for the distribution of  
          medications, arranging for the preparation and service of meals  
          and snacks, arranging for the preparation of the residents'  
          records and medications for transfer of each resident, assisting  
          in any way necessary to facilitate a safe transfer of all  
          residents, and checking on the status of each transferred  
          resident within 24 hours of transfer.

          The DSS would likely incur one-time potentially significant  
          costs to establish the framework for the response plan and  
          protocol to implement the expanded duties, to ensure DSS is  
          prepared to respond effectively and efficiently in the event of  








          SB 894 (Corbett)
          Page 4


          a temporary suspension or revocation requiring DSS action.  
          Future costs for providing or arranging for the services would  
          be dependent on the number of residents requiring the services  
          enumerated in the bill in the event of a license suspension or  
          revocation, and could be substantial.

          While the bill provides that a licensee that fails to comply  
          with the "requirements of this section" shall be required to  
          reimburse the department and local agencies for the cost of  
          providing these services, the provision mandating DSS to request  
          the Attorney General or local prosecutors to seek injunctive  
          relief and damages, as specified, would also incur additional  
          costs, with reimbursement, if successful, potentially not  
          realized for an extended period of time. 

          This bill authorizes current and former RCFE residents to bring  
          a civil action against any person, firm, partnership, or  
          corporation that owns, operates, establishes, manages, conducts,  
          or maintains a RCFE that violates the rights of the resident.  
          Due to the expanded duties of care required under the provisions  
          of this bill that could generally place DSS and its employees as  
          persons "managing or maintaining" an RCFE, this appears to place  
          undue liability on DSS and its employees during any period in  
          which the expanded duties of care are being provided. 

          Author amendments remove the potential undue liability to the  
          state and DSS employees.