BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 910
Page 1
Date of Hearing: June 18, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 910 (Pavley) - As Amended: March 24, 2014
Policy Committee: Public Safety
Vote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill expands the definition of domestic violence for
purposes related to a court's ability to issue restraining
orders in domestic violence cases during criminal proceedings
and upon conviction of domestic violence offenses. Specifically,
this bill includes abuse perpetrated against the following
persons:
1)Cohabitants and former cohabitants, defined more broadly.
2)A person with whom the respondent has a child, where the
presumption applies that the male parent is the father of the
child of the female parent, as specified.
3)A child of a party or a child who is the subject of an action
under the Uniform Parentage Act, where the presumption applies
that the male parent is the father of the child to be
protected.
4)Any other person related by consanguinity or affinity within
the second degree.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor administrative court costs and potential nonreimbursable
local law enforcement costs to the extent the definitional
expansion results in additional persons violating restraining
orders.
COMMENTS
SB 910
Page 2
Rationale . Under existing law, the Penal Code defines domestic
violence as abuse committed against an adult or a minor who is a
spouse, former spouse, cohabitant or former cohabitant, as
defined, or person with whom the suspect has a child or has had
a dating relationship.
According to the author and the sponsor of the bill, the L.A.
District Attorney's Office, the current definition is too narrow
as it does not cover children. To address this issue, the bill
adds a reference to Family Code section 6211 which defines
domestic violence as abuse perpetrated against a spouse or
former spouse, a cohabitant or former cohabitant, as defined, a
person with whom the respondent has had a child, as specified, a
child of a party or a child who is the subject of an action
under the Uniform Parentage Act, where the presumption applies
that the male parent is the father of the child to be protected,
or any other person related by blood or marriage within the
second degree.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081