BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 915|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 915
          Author:   Hill (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/30/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 4/24/14
          AYES:  Liu, Wyland, Block, Galgiani, Hancock, Hueso, Huff,  
            Monning
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Correa

           SENATE FLOOR  :  35-0, 5/1/14 (Consent)
          AYES:  Anderson, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De  
            Le�n, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hancock,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Knight, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu,  
            Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nielsen, Padilla, Pavley, Roth,  
            Steinberg, Torres, Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Beall, Calderon, Jackson, Wright, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/7/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Standardized testing:  inadequate or improper test  
          conditions

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill imposes specified requirements on test  
          agencies and schools when they learn of a complaint or notice of  
          inadequate or improper test conditions in the administration of  
          the Advanced Placement (AP) test.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 915
                                                                     Page  
          2

           Assembly Amendments  require the test agency, upon a  
          determination that inadequate or improper test conditions will  
          prevent it from reporting valid test scores, to notify the  
          school in charge of the test site of the decision within two  
          business days and requires the school in charge to notify  
          affected test subject within two business days and provide all  
          affected test subjects with at least five business days prior  
          notice of the opportunity to retest; and make various technical  
          and clarifying changes.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law imposes a number of requirements on  
          test sponsors or test agencies (defined as any individual,  
          partnership, corporation, association, company, firm,  
          institution, society, trust, or joint stock company) that  
          develop, sponsor or administer standardized tests (defined as  
          any test administered in California at the expense of the test  
          subject and used for purposes of admission to, or class  
          placement in, postsecondary institutions or their programs, or  
          preliminary preparation for those tests).  

          Existing law also specifies that whenever the test agency  
          determines that substantial evidence exists to support  
          cancellation or invalidation of a test score, the test agency  
          shall provide the test subject with a choice of the following  
          options:

          1. A cancellation of the test scores in question, with full  
             refund of all test fees.

          2. Opportunity to take the test again privately and without  
             charge.

          3. Opportunity to seek judicial review of the matter.

          However, these options are not applicable in instances of  
          inadequate or improper test conditions.

          Finally, existing law also provides that a test sponsor who  
          violates any of these provisions is liable for a civil penalty  
          not to exceed $750 per violation.  

          This bill:   

          1. Requires the test agency to initiate an investigation upon  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 915
                                                                     Page  
          3

             learning of a complaint or a notice of inadequate or improper  
             test conditions relating to an administration of the AP test  
             within two business days.

          2. Requires the school in charge of the test site to cooperate  
             with the test agency's investigation by providing information  
             requested by the test agency within five business days.

          3. Requires the test agency, upon a determination that  
             inadequate or improper test conditions will prevent it from  
             reporting valid test scores, to notify the school in charge  
             of the test site of the decision within two business days and  
             requires the school in charge to notify affected test subject  
             within two business days and provide all affected test  
             subjects with at least five business days prior notice of the  
             opportunity to retest. 

          4. Requires the retest to be administered within 30 calendar  
             days of the completion of the investigation.

          5. Requires test proctors of an administration of an AP test to  
             create a seating chart, including the seat location of each  
             test subject, for each AP test administered at the site.

          6. Requires the test agency to provide a seating chart template  
             for use by each test site.

          7. Requires the school in charge of the test site to retain and  
             preserve each chart created for at least one year after the  
             administration of the AP test to which that chart applies.

          8. Requires the school in charge of the test site to submit the  
             seating charts to the test agency upon request to assist with  
             an investigation of a complaint or notice of inadequate or  
             improper test conditions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   Local:  
           No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/7/14)

          California School Boards Association

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/7/14

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 915
                                                                     Page  
          4

          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi,  
            Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, 
            Patterson, Perea, John A. P�rez, V. Manuel P�rez, Quirk,  
            Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner,  
            Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk,  
            Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fox, Vacancy


          PQ:d  8/8/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
























                                                                CONTINUED