BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 963 (Torres) - Special Elections
          
          Amended: As Introduced          Policy Vote: E&CA 5-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: April 7, 2014                             
          Consultant: Maureen Ortiz       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.

          
          Bill Summary:  SB 963 requires the state to reimburse counties  
          for the costs of special elections incurred on or after January  
          1, 2013 proclaimed by the Governor to fill vacancies in the  
          California State Legislature and California Congressional seats.

          Fiscal Impact:
           
              One-time costs of approximately $15 million, and   
              potentially $3-$5 million on-going annual costs (General  
              Fund)

          Exact costs will be dependent on the number of special elections  
          held each year, whether both a primary and a general election is  
          necessary for each race, whether the special election can be  
          consolidated with another election in which case the state would  
          reimburse only the incremental costs associated with the special  
          election, and if the district race encompasses more than one  
          county. 

          Background:   Existing law requires any vacancy in a state  
          legislative or congressional office to be filled by a special  
          primary, and, if needed a special run-off election.  All  
          expenses authorized and necessarily incurred in the preparation  
          for, and conduct of, elections to be paid from the county  
          treasuries, except that when an election is called by the  
          governing body of a city the expenses shall be paid from the  
          treasury of the city.

          First implemented by AB 37 (Johnson), Chapter 39, Statutes of  
          1993, the state had reimbursed counties for the costs of special  
          elections held to fill vacancies in the Senate, Assembly, and  
          Congress from 1993 through 2007.  Since 2008, there have been  








          SB 963 (Torres)
          Page 1



          numerous, but unsuccessful, legislative attempts to extend this  
          reimbursement provision. 

          According to the Secretary of State (SOS), since 1989 there have  
          been 136 special primary and general elections held to fill  
          vacant seats in the Assembly, Senate and Congress in California;  
          an average of 5.6 per year.  However, the frequency of special  
          elections seems to be increasing and 40 special elections have  
          been held for the period covering January 1, 2008 to date.

          A special election to fill a vacancy in the office of  
          Representative in Congress, State Senator, or Member of the  
          Assembly must be conducted on a Tuesday at least 126 days, but  
          not more than 140 days, following the issuance of an election  
          proclamation by the Governor, except that the special election  
          may be conducted within 180 days following the proclamation if  
          the special election will be consolidated with the next  
          regularly scheduled statewide election or local election.


          Proposed Law:  SB 963 requires the state to reimburse counties  
          for all expenses authorized and necessarily incurred on or after  
          January 1, 2013 in the preparation for, and conduct of,  
          elections proclaimed by the Governor to fill a vacancy in the  
          office of state Senator or Member of the Assembly, or United  
          States Senator or Member of the House of Representatives.

          Related Legislation:  SB 942 (Vidak) is scheduled to be heard by  
          this committee today and would reimburse counties for special  
          election expenses incurred on or after January 1, 2008 through  
          December 31, 2014.   Identical to this bill, AB 2273  
          (Ridley-Thomas) is pending for hearing in the Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee.  Additionally, other measures  
          previously introduced that would have reimbursed counties for  
          the costs of special elections include SB 519 (Emmerson) of  
          2013, SB 106 (Blakeslee) 2011, SB 141 (Price) of 2011, SB 994  
          (Price) of 2010, AB 496 (Davis) of 2010 - all of which were held  
          in this committee's Suspense File.  AB 1769 (Tran) was held in  
          the Assembly Appropriations Committee in 2010.

          Staff Comments:  The costs of holding special elections have  
          forced many counties to redirect existing resources that would  
          have provided critical services to the communities as these  








          SB 963 (Torres)
          Page 2



          elections are unanticipated and not budgeted on an annual basis.  
           Since the passage of Proposition 140 in 1990, there have been  
          more than one hundred special elections called by the Governor  
          to fill such vacancies, all of which impose financial hardships  
          on the affected counties.

          The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk  
          administers numerous special vacancy elections a year at the  
          expense of the County.  In 2013 alone, the County spent an  
          estimated $12 million to prepare for and conduct nine special  
          vacancy elections.