BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 973 (Hernandez) - Narcotic treatment programs.
          
          Amended: April 29, 2014         Policy Vote: Health 8-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 12, 2014      Consultant: Brendan McCarthy
          
          This bill does not meet the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: SB 973 would make several changes to the statutes  
          governing narcotic treatment programs.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Potential one-time costs up to $50,000 to revise existing  
              regulations by the Department of Health Care Services  
              (General Fund and federal funds).

              Unknown impact on county Drug Medi-Cal programs (local  
              realignment funds). The bill would allow a narcotic  
              treatment program to admit a Medi-Cal beneficiary at the  
              medical director's discretion, rather than seven days after  
              completion of a withdrawal treatment episode. This change to  
              law may have the effect of increasing demand for services  
              from narcotic treatment programs. The extent of such a  
              change in demand is unknown.

              Under current law, narcotic treatment programs provide drug  
              treatment services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Drug Medi-Cal  
              was realigned to the counties in 2011 and the non-federal  
              share of costs to provide Drug Medi-Cal benefits is  
              generally paid by the counties from their realignment funds.  
              Thus any additional costs to the Drug Medi-Cal program would  
              likely be borne by the counties.

          Background: Under state and federal law, the Department of  
          Health Care Services operates the Medi-Cal program, which  
          provides health care coverage to pregnant women, children and  
          their parents with low incomes, as well as blind, disabled, and  
          certain other populations. Generally, the federal government  
          provides a 50 percent federal match for state expenditures. 









          SB 973 (Hernandez)
          Page 1


          Pursuant to the federal Affordable Care Act, California has  
          opted to expand eligibility for Medi-Cal up to 138 percent of  
          the federal poverty level and to include childless adults.  The  
          Affordable Care Act provides a significantly enhanced federal  
          match for the Medi-Cal expansion. Under the law, the federal  
          government will pay for 100 percent of the cost of the expansion  
          in 2013-14 declining to a 90 percent federal match in the 2020  
          federal fiscal year and thereafter.

          With the exception of certain populations (for example,  
          individuals eligible for limited scope Medi-Cal benefits or  
          individuals dually eligible for Medi-Cal and Medicare in most  
          counties), managed care is the primary system for providing  
          Medi-Cal benefits. The Department estimates that in 2014-15, 7.5  
          million Medi-Cal beneficiaries (73 percent of total enrollment)  
          will receive care through the managed care system. However, Drug  
          Medi-Cal, which is the package of benefits related to substance  
          use disorders has been "carved out" of managed care. Drug  
          Medi-Cal is a benefit provided by the counties generally using  
          realignment funds.

          Proposed Law: SB 973 would make several changes to the statutes  
          governing narcotic treatment programs.

          Specific provisions of the bill would:
              Require narcotic treatment programs to test a patient's  
              urine or other body fluid for specified narcotic drugs;
              Authorize a narcotic treatment program to admit a patient  
              at the discretion of the medical director, rather than seven  
              days after completion of a prior withdrawal treatment  
              episode;
              Prohibit narcotic treatment programs from providing  
              take-home medication doses that require dilution;
              Require narcotic treatment programs to assign a unique  
              identification number to patients;
              Make other clarifying and technical changes.

          Staff Comments: As noted above, Drug Medi-Cal has been realigned  
          to the counties. Therefore, counties are responsible for paying  
          the non-federal share of Medi-Cal costs for services authorized  
          in Drug Medi-Cal. However, as part of the state's expansion of  
          Medi-Cal under the federal Affordable Care Act, the state also  
          expanded the Medi-Cal benefit package to include benefits  
          provided in the state's essential health benefits benchmark plan  








          SB 973 (Hernandez)
          Page 2


          (the Kaiser Permanente Small Group Plan). In doing so, the state  
          expanded Drug Medi-Cal to include some new benefits. For new or  
          expanded Drug Medi-Cal benefits, the state is responsible for  
          paying for the non-federal share of costs, whereas the counties  
          will continue to be responsible for paying the non-federal share  
          of costs for existing benefits.  Because this bill makes changes  
          to a benefit that continues to be a county Drug Medi-Cal  
          responsibility, the state is not obligated to provide the  
          non-federal cost share.
          
          Pursuant to Government Code Section 30026.5, legislation enacted  
          after September 30, 2012, that has an overall effect of  
          increasing the costs already borne by a local agency for  
          programs or levels of service under the 2011 Realignment shall  
          apply to local agencies only to the extent that the state  
          provides annual funding for the cost increase. Local agencies  
          shall not be obligated to provide programs or levels of service  
          required by legislation above the level for which funding has  
          been provided.