SB 1019, as amended, Leno. Upholstered furniture: flame retardant chemicals.
Existing federal law requires the Consumer Product Safety Commission to institute proceedings for the determination of an appropriate flammability standard if the commission finds that such a standard, including labeling, for a fabric, related material, or product, may be needed to protect the public. Existing federal law authorizes a state to establish a flammability standard if, among other things, it provides a higher degree of protection from the risk of fire.
Existing state law, the Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of upholstered furniture manufacturers by the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation. Existing state law requires every upholstered-furniture manufacturer to hold a furniture and bedding manufacturer’s license. Existing state law also requires every upholstered-furniture retailer to hold a retail furniture dealer’s license. A violation of the act is a crime and each offense is punishable by a fine, as specified.
Existing state law requires certain upholstered furniture to contain a specified label that is permanently attached in an area open to visible view. Existing state law establishes a standard to produce upholstered furniture which is safer from the hazards associated with smoldering ignition. This standard provides methods for smolder resistance of cover fabrics, barrier materials, resilient filling materials, and decking materials for use in upholstered furniture.
This bill would require a manufacturer of covered products, as defined, to indicate whether or not the product contains added flame retardant chemicals, as defined, by including a specified statement on that label.
The bill would require the manufacturer of the covered product to retain sufficient documentation to show whether flame retardant chemicals were added to a covered product or component. The bill would provide that a written statement by the supplier of each component attesting that flame retardant chemicals were added or not added is sufficient to make this showing. The bill would require the bureau to assess a fine for a violation of the documentation requirement or for failure to provide, upon request, the required documentation to the bureau, as specified.
The bill would require a manufacturer of a covered product sold in California, upon request, to provide to the bureau, within 30 days of the request, documentation establishing the accuracy of the flame retardant chemical statement on the label. The bill would require the bureau to provide the Department of Toxic Substances Control with samples of the covered product or components thereof sold in California from products marked “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals” for testing for the presence of added flame retardant chemicals, as specified. If the department’s testing shows that a covered product labeled as “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals” is mislabeled because it contains added flame retardant chemicals, the bill would require the bureau to assess fines for violations against manufacturers of the covered product and component manufacturers, as specified.
The bill would require the bureau to make information about any citation issued pursuant to its provisions available to the public on its Internet Web site. The bill would also make it the duty of the bureau to receive consumer complaints.
The bill would authorize the bureau to adopt regulations to carry out these provisions.
Because a violation of the bill’s requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) In 1975, California implemented Technical Bulletin 117,
4which requires that materials, such as polyurethane foam, used to
5fill furniture be able to withstand a small open flame for at least
612 seconds.
7(b) Flame retardant chemicals are used widely in upholstered
8furniture to meet the flame retardant standards of the Bureau of
9Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal
10Insulation’s Technical Bulletin 117.
11(c) People are exposed to flame retardant chemicals in multiple
12ways, including when the chemicals migrate from furniture and
13other consumer products into air and dust in the home or
14workplace.
15(d) Some of these chemicals can persist in the environment,
16bioaccumulate in people and animals, and have been shown to
17cause adverse developmental effects in animals and humans.
18(e) A study by the California Environmental Protection Agency
19found that women in California have much higher levels of toxic
20flame retardants in their breast tissue than women in other states
P4 1and countries. Studies published in the journal of Environmental
2Research show that children in California have much
higher levels
3of flame retardant chemicals than children elsewhere in the country.
4(f) A study published in the Journal of Occupational and
5Environmental Medicine concluded that firefighters have a
6significantly elevated risk of cancer that may be attributed to toxic
7chemicals they inhale, including flame retardants.
8(g) Various studies have linked exposure to flame retardants to
9cancer, lower IQs and attention problems, male infertility, male
10birth defects, and early puberty in girls.
11(h) In 2012, Governor Brown asked the Bureau of Electronic
12and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation
13to review the state’s four-decade-old flammability
standards and
14recommend changes to reduce toxic flame retardants while
15continuing to ensure fire safety.
16(i) The Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home
17Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation concluded that “studies show
18that fire retardant (FR) tested foam does not provide a meaningful
19difference in egress time from non-FR foam and increases
20smoldering propensity.” In 2013, the Bureau of Electronic and
21Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation
22promulgated regulations revising Technical Bulletin 117 to allow
23furniture manufacturers to meet a smoldering standard. The revised
24Technical Bulletin 117-2013 provides improved fire safety
25standards without the use of flame retardant chemicals.
26(j) Technical Bulletin
117-2013 can be met with or without the
27use of flame retardant chemicals, but consumers currently have
28no way to know whether flame retardant chemicals have been
29added to the product.
30(k) Consumers want to be able to exercise an informed choice
31and buy products that are not only safer for themselves and their
32families, but are products that will also keep our firefighters safer.
33(l) It is, therefore, the intent of the Legislature in enacting this
34measure to provide California consumers clear information about
35the furniture products they are purchasing, specifically concerning
36compliance with fire safety standards and the absence or presence
37of added flame retardant chemicals.
Section 19094 is added to the Business and Professions
39Code, to read:
(a) For the purposes of this section, the following
2definitions shall apply:
3(1) “Component” means the separate constituent parts of
4upholstered furniture sold in California, as identified in Technical
5Bulletin 117-2013, specifically cover fabrics, barrier materials,
6resilient filling materials, and decking materials.
7(2) “Covered products” means any flexible polyurethane foam
8or upholstered or reupholstered furniture sold in California that is
9required to meet the test requirements set forth in Technical
10Bulletin 117-2013, entitled “Requirements, Test Procedure and
11Apparatus for Testing the Smolder
Resistance of Materials Used
12in Upholstered Furniture.”
13(3) “Flame retardant chemical” means any chemical or chemical
14compound for which abegin delete purportedend delete functional use is to resist or
15inhibit the spread of fire. Flame retardant chemicals include, but
16are not limited to, halogenated, phosphorous-based, nitrogen-based,
17and nanoscale flame retardants,begin delete andend delete flame retardant chemicals
18listed as “designated chemicals” pursuant to Section 105440 of
19the Health and Safetybegin delete Codeend deletebegin insert Code, and any chemical or chemical
20compound for which “flame retardant” appears on the
substance
21Safety Data Sheet (SDS) pursuant to Section 1910.1200(g) of Title
2229 of the Code of Federal Regulationsend insert.
23(4) “Chemical” means either of the following:
24(A) An organic or inorganic substance of a particular molecular
25identity, including any combination of those substances occurring,
26in whole or in part, as a result of a chemical reaction or occurring
27in nature, and any element, ion, or uncombined radical, and any
28begin delete degradeend deletebegin insert degradateend insert, metabolite, or reaction product of a substance
29with a
particular molecular identity.
30(B) A chemical ingredient, which means a substance comprising
31one or more substances described in subparagraph (A).
32(5) “Molecular identity” means the substance’s properties listed
33below:
34(A) Agglomeration state.
35(B) Bulk density.
36(C) Chemical composition, including surface coating.
37(D) Crystal structure.
38(E) Dispersability.
39(F) Molecular structure.
40(G) Particle density.
P6 1(H) Particle size, size distribution, and surface area.
2(I) Physical form and shape, at room temperature and pressure.
3(J) Physicochemical properties.
4(K) Porosity.
5(L) Solubility in water and biologically relevant fluids.
6(M) Surface charge.
7(N) Surface reactivity.
8(6) “Added flame retardant chemicals” means flame retardant
9chemicals
that are present in any covered product or component
10thereof at levels above 1,000 parts per million.
11(7) “Department” means the Department of Toxic Substances
12Control.
13(8) “Consumer Price Index” means the Consumer Price Index
14for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor
15Statistics.
16(b) (1) A manufacturer of covered products shall indicate
17whether or not the product contains added flame retardant
18chemicals by including the following “flame retardant chemical
19statement” on the label described in Section 1374.3 of Title 4 of
20the California Code of Regulations for covered products:
22“The upholstery materials in this product:
23_____contain added flame retardant chemicals
24_____contain NO added flame retardant chemicals
25The State of California has updated the flammability standard
26and determined that the fire safety requirements for this product
27can be met without adding flame retardant chemicals. The state
28has identified many flame retardant chemicals as being known to,
29or strongly suspected of, adversely impacting human health or
30development.”
32 A manufacturer of covered products shall indicate the absence
33or presence of added flame retardant chemicals by placing an “X”
34in one of the appropriate blanks.
35(2) This statement shall be included in the
label described in
36Section 1374.3 of Title 4 of the California Code of Regulations in
37accordance with the bureau’s regulations for that label. The
38statement need not be in all capital letters, and shall follow the
39statement required by Section 1374.3 of Title 4 of the California
40Code of Regulations.
P7 1(c) (1) The manufacturer of the covered product sold in
2California shall retain documentation to show whether flame
3retardant chemicals were added. A written statement by the supplier
4of each component covered by Technical Bulletin 117-2013
5attesting either that flame retardant chemicals were added or not
6added shall be sufficient documentation.
7(2) The bureau shall ensure compliance with the labeling and
8documentation requirements in this section.
9(3) (A) Upon request, a manufacturer of a covered product sold
10in California shall provide to the bureau, within 30 days of the
11request, documentation establishing the accuracy of the flame
12retardant chemical statement on the label required by subdivision
13(b).
14(B) The bureau shall assess fines of not less than two thousand
15five hundred dollars ($2,500) but not more than fifteen thousand
16dollars ($15,000) in accordance with the factors described in
17subdivision (d) for the failure of the manufacturer of the covered
18product to maintain the documentation required by this section,
19or for the failure of the manufacturer of the covered product to
20provide, upon request, the documentation required by this section
21to the bureau. These fines shall replace any other fines in
this article
22for a violation of the documentation requirements of this section.
23This subparagraph does not alter or amend any other penalty
24otherwise imposed by this article.
25(C) A manufacturer of covered products and component
26suppliers shall be jointly and severally liable for violations of the
27documentation required in this section.
28(D) begin insert(i)end insertbegin insert end insert The bureau shall provide the Department of Toxic
29Substances Control with a selection of samples from covered
30products marked “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals”
31for testing for the presence of added flame retardant
chemicals.
32The samples shall be from the components identified in paragraph
33(1) of subdivision (a). The bureau shall select samples based on
34consultation with the department, taking into account a range of
35manufacturers and types of covered products. The bureau and the
36department shall consult on the tests to be conducted by the
37department. The department shall provide the results of any
38completed test to the bureau.begin insert The bureau shall reimburse the
39department for the cost of testing for the presence of added flame
P8 1retardant chemicals in covered products marked “contain NO
2added flame retardant chemicals”.end insert
3(ii) No later than August 1 of each fiscal year, the bureau shall
4assess available resources and
determine the number of tests to
5be conducted in the corresponding fiscal year, pursuant to this
6subparagraph.
7(E) (i) If the department’s testing shows that a covered product
8labeled as “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals” is
9mislabeled because it contains added flame retardant chemicals,
10the bureau may assess fines for violations against manufacturers
11of the covered product and component manufacturers to be held
12jointly and severally liable for the violation.
13(ii) A fine for a violation of this subparagraph relating to
14mislabeling shall be assessed in accordance with the factors
15described in subdivision (d) and the following schedule:
16(I) The fine for the first violation shall be
not less than one
17thousand dollars ($1,000) but not more than two thousand five
18hundred dollars ($2,500).
19(II) The fine for the second violation shall be not less than two
20thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) but not more than five
21thousand dollars ($5,000).
22(III) The fine for the third violation shall be not less than five
23thousand dollars ($5,000) but not more than seven thousand five
24hundred dollars ($7,500).
25(IV) The fine for any subsequent violation shall be not less than
26seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) but not more than
27ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
28(iii) The fines in clause (ii) shall replace any other fines in this
29article for a
violation of the testing requirements of this section.
30This clause does not alter or amend any other penalty otherwise
31imposed by this article.
32(iv) If the department’s testing shows that a covered product
33labeled as “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals” is
34mislabeled because it contains added flame retardant chemicals,
35in addition to a fine or any other request, the bureau may request
36that the label required by subdivision (b) for covered products that
37belong to the same stock keeping unit (SKU) currently produced
38by the manufacturer be corrected to reflect that flame retardant
39chemicals are added to the covered product.
P9 1(v) If the department’s testing shows that a covered product
2labeled as “contain NO added flame retardant chemicals” is
3mislabeled because it contains
added flame retardant chemicals,
4in addition to a fine or any other request, the bureau may request
5additional testing of more products belonging to the same stock
6keeping unit (SKU) at the manufacturer’s expense to verify the
7accuracy of the label required by subdivision (b) for covered
8products if the manufacturer wishes to retain the “contain NO
9added flame retardant chemicals” designation on the label required
10by subdivision (b).
11(d) (1) The bureau shall make information about any citation
12issued pursuant to this section available to the public on its Internet
13Web site.
14(2) In determining the amount of the fine for violations of this
15section, the bureau shall consider the following factors:
16(A) The nature and severity of the violation.
17(B) The good or bad faith of the cited person.
18(C) The history of previous violations.
19(D) Evidence that the violation was willful.
20(E) The extent to which the cited person or entity has cooperated
21with the bureau.
22(3) (A) The bureau shall adjust all minimum and maximum
23fines imposed by this section for inflation every five years.
24(B) The adjustment shall be equivalent to the percentage, if any,
25that the Consumer Price Index at the time of adjustment exceeds
26the Consumer
Price Index at the time this section goes into effect.
27Any increase determined under this paragraph shall be rounded as
28follows:
29(i) In multiples of ten dollars ($10) in the case of penalties less
30than or equal to one hundred dollars ($100).
31(ii) In multiples of one hundred dollars ($100) in the case of
32penalties greater than one hundred dollars ($100) but less than or
33equal to one thousand dollars ($1,000).
34(iii) In multiples of one thousand dollars ($1,000) in the case
35of penalties greater than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
36(4) It shall be the duty of the bureau to receive complaints from
37consumers concerning covered products sold in California.
38(e) The bureau may adopt regulations pursuant to the
39Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with
P10 1Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government
2Code) to carry out this section.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
4Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
5the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
6district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
7infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
8for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
9the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
10the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
11Constitution.
O
91