SB 1040,
as amended, Evans. begin deleteAlcoholic beverages: wine labeling. end deletebegin insertFood labeling: genetically engineered food.end insert
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale, any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified state and federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor.
end insertbegin insertThis bill, beginning January 1, 2016, would require that any food, except as provided, offered for retail sale in the state be considered misbranded if it is entirely or partially genetically engineered, as defined, and that fact is not disclosed in a specified manner. The bill would prescribe labeling requirements for a raw agricultural commodity that is genetically engineered and packaged foods, as defined, containing some products of genetic engineering. The bill would impose these labeling requirements on manufacturers and retailers, as defined, of the commodities and foods.
end insertbegin insertBecause this bill would create new crimes by expanding the number of foods that could potentially be misbranded, it would impose a state-mandated local program.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
end insertThe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act makes it unlawful to make any representation that a wine is produced entirely from grapes grown in specified counties unless the representation is true. The act specifies that those provisions apply to representations made on labels, advertising matter, letterheads, invoices, tags, signs, business cards, and all other representations of any kind whether oral, written, or printed. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor.
end deleteThis bill would additionally provide that these provisions apply to representations made on bottles and to representations made in an electronic form. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end deleteThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end deleteThis bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) California consumers have the right to know, through
4labeling, whether the foods they purchase were produced with
5genetic engineering, so they can make informed purchasing
6decisions.
7(b) Polls consistently show that the vast majority of the members
8of the public, more than 90 percent, want to know, for health,
P3 1economic, environmental, religious, and ethical reasons, if the
2food they purchase was produced with genetic
engineering.
3(c) Without mandatory disclosure, consumers of foods produced
4through genetic engineering may unknowingly violate their dietary
5and religious beliefs.
6(d) There is currently no federal or California requirement that
7genetically engineered (GE) foods be labeled. In contrast, 64
8countries, including three of California’s leading trading partners,
9Japan, China, and the European Union member states, as well as
10South Korea, Australia, Russia, and Malaysia, already have laws
11mandating that foods produced through genetic engineering be
12labeled.
13(e) The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
14does not require safety studies of GE foods. Instead, any
15consultations are voluntary and GE food developers may decide
16what information to provide to the FDA.
17(f) Genetic engineering of plants and animals can cause
18unintended consequences. It has been demonstrated that
19manipulating genes through genetic engineering and inserting
20them into organisms is an imprecise process. The results are not
21always predictable or controllable.
22(g) United States government scientists have stated that the
23artificial insertion of genetic material into plants via genetic
24engineering can increase the levels of known toxicants or allergens
25in foods and create new toxicants or allergens with consequent
26health concerns.
27(h) Mandatory identification of foods produced with genetic
28engineering can provide a method for detecting, at a large
29epidemiological scale, the potential health effects of consuming
30those foods.
31(i) Numerous foreign markets with restrictions on foods
32produced
through genetic engineering have restricted imports of
33United States crops due to concerns about genetic engineering.
34Some foreign markets are choosing to purchase agricultural
35products from countries other than the United States because GE
36crops are not identified in the United States, which makes it
37impossible for buyers to determine what does or does not meet
38their national labeling laws or restrictions and thus renders United
39States products less desirable.
P4 1(j) Agricultural exports in California in 2011 generated $16.8
2billion in revenue, representing 39 percent of total production.
3Mandatory identification of foods produced with genetic
4engineering can be a critical method of preserving the economic
5value of exports or domestically sensitive markets with restrictions
6on, or prohibitions against, genetic engineering. Preserving the
7identity, quality, and reliability of California’s agricultural
8products and exports is critical to the
state’s economic well-being.
9(k) The cultivation of GE crops can have serious effects on the
10environment. For example, in the year 2012, 93 percent of all soy
11grown in the United States was genetically engineered to be
12herbicide resistant. In fact, the vast majority of GE crops are
13designed to withstand herbicides and they, therefore, promote
14indiscriminate herbicide use. As a result, GE crops have caused
15527 million pounds of additional herbicides to be applied to the
16nation’s farmland. These toxic herbicides damage the vitality and
17quality of our soil, contaminate our drinking water, and pose health
18risks to consumers and farmworkers. Further, because of the
19consequent massive increase in herbicide use, herbicide-resistant
20weeds have developed and flourished, infesting farm fields and
21roadsides, complicating weed control for farmers, and causing
22farmers to resort to more and increasingly toxic herbicides.
23(l) The FDA is currently proposing approval of the first GE
24salmon for human consumption. Wild Pacific salmon are a critical
25natural and cultural resource of California and are under
26increasing environmental stress. More than 106 major salmon
27runs in northern California and the Pacific Northwest are extinct
28and another 214 runs of wild salmon are at risk of extinction. An
29escaped GE fish could pose additional environmental risk to
30California’s already stressed wild salmon populations and coastal
31ecosystems by, among other things, imposing new competitive
32pressures on these populations for food and space, interfering with
33effective breeding and reproduction, and spreading disease. The
34west coast salmon fishing industry, including both commercial
35and recreational components, has lost an estimated 72,000 jobs
36during the last 20 years. In the face of market confusion, seafood
37consumers may avoid purchasing salmon altogether to avoid
38genetically
engineered salmon which would further negatively
39impact California’s wild salmon fishermen.
P5 1(m) The people of California should have the choice to avoid
2purchasing foods produced in ways that can lead to that
3environmental harm.
4(n) Labeling of foods produced through genetic engineering as
5provided in this act can be implemented without substantial burden
6to either food producers or the government.
It is the intent of the Legislature, with the enactment
8of this act, to require the labeling of all foods produced with
9genetic engineering sold within the state, with exceptions.
begin insertSection 110663 is added to the end insertbegin insertHealth and Safety Codeend insertbegin insert,
11to read:end insert
A food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform
13to the requirements of Section 110809.
begin insertArticle 6.6 (commencing with Section 110808) is added
15to Chapter 5 of Part 5 of Division 104 of the end insertbegin insertHealth and Safety
16Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
17
The following definitions shall apply for the purposes
22of this article only:
23(a) “Food” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 109935,
24except that “food” as used in this article includes only food for
25human consumption and not any food for consumption by animals.
26(b) (1) “Genetically engineered” means produced from an
27organism or organisms in which the genetic material has been
28changed through the application of either of the following:
29(A) (i) In vitro nucleic acid techniques, which include, but are
30not limited to, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or
31ribonucleic acid (RNA)
direct injection of nucleic acid into cells
32or organelles, encapsulation, gene deletion, and doubling.
33(ii) “In vitro nucleic acid techniques” include, but are not
34limited to, recombinant DNA or RNA techniques that use vector
35systems, and techniques involving the direct introduction into the
36organisms of hereditary materials prepared outside the organisms
37such as biolistics, microinjection, macroinjection, chemoporation,
38electroporation, microencapsulation, and liposome fusion.
39(B) Methods of fusing cells beyond the taxonomic family that
40overcome natural physiological, reproductive, or recombinant
P6 1barriers, and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding
2and selection such as conjugation, transduction, and hybridization.
3(2) “Genetically engineered” does not include an animal who
4has not itself been
genetically engineered, regardless of whether
5that animal has been fed or injected with any food or any drug
6that has been produced through means of genetic engineering.
7(c) “Label” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 109955.
8(d) “Labeling” shall have the meaning set forth in Section
9109960.
10(e) “Manufacturer” means the person or entity that makes,
11processes, combines, or packages food ingredients into a finished
12product.
13(f) “Organism” means any biological entity capable of
14replication, reproduction, or transferring genetic material.
15(g) “Packaged food” means any food offered for retail sale in
16the state, other than raw food and food served, sold, or provided
17ready to eat in any
bake sale, restaurant, or cafeteria that are
18subject to the provisions of Article 6 (commencing with Section
19110660).
20(h) “Raw agricultural commodity” shall have the meaning set
21forth in Section 110020.
22(i) “Retailer” means an establishment engaged in the business
23of selling any perishable agricultural commodity or packaged food
24via a storefront.
25(j) “Supplier” means a person or entity that engages in the
26operation of selling or distributing raw agricultural commodities
27that the person or entity has produced, purchased, or acquired
28from a processor.
(a) Any raw agricultural commodity or packaged
30food that is entirely or partially produced with genetic engineering
31shall be labeled in accordance with this article and is misbranded
32if not labeled in accordance with this article.
33(b) This section does not apply to an alcoholic beverage that is
34subject to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Division 9
35(commencing with Section 23000) of the Business and Professions
36Code).
37(c) This section does not apply to any food sold at a storefront
38with 10 or fewer employees or a certified farmers’ market, field
39retail stand, or farm stand, as defined by Sections 47004, 47030,
40and 47050 of the Food and Agricultural Code.
(a) (1) A manufacturer of a raw agricultural
2commodity packaged for retail sale shall include the words
3“Genetically Engineered” clearly and conspicuously on the front
4or back of the package of that commodity.
5(2) A retailer of a raw agricultural commodity that is not
6separately packaged or labeled shall place a clear and conspicuous
7label on the retail store shelf or bin in which that commodity is
8displayed for sale.
9(b) A manufacturer of packaged food containing some products
10of genetic engineering shall label the product in clear and
11conspicuous language on the front or back of the package of that
12food product with the words “Produced with Genetic
Engineering”
13or “Partially Produced with Genetic Engineering.”
14(c) This section shall not be construed to require a label that
15lists or identifies an ingredient that was genetically engineered,
16or that the words “genetically engineered” be placed immediately
17preceding any common name or primary product descriptor of a
18food.
19(d) This section does not apply to an alcoholic beverage that is
20subject to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Division 9
21(commencing with Section 23000) of the Business and Professions
22Code).
23(e) This section does not apply to any food sold at a storefront
24with 10 or fewer employees or a certified farmers’ market, field
25retail stand, or farm stand, as defined by Sections 47004, 47030,
26and 47050 of the Food and Agricultural Code.
(a) A person engaged in business as a manufacturer
28or retailer of products who in good faith sells, offers for sale,
29labels, or advertises any product in reliance on the representations
30of a farmer, producer, or supplier that the product is not entirely
31or partially produced with genetic engineering, shall not be found
32to have violated this article unless the manufacturer or retailer
33knew or should have known that the product was entirely or
34partially produced with genetic engineering.
35(b) A farmer, producer, or supplier who is not a retailer or
36manufacturer is not liable for a violation of this article.
37(c) It shall not be a violation of this article for failure to label
38
any of the following:
P8 1(1) Packaged food in which the materials produced through
2genetic engineering account for nine-tenths of 1 percent or less of
3the total weight.
4(2) Food produced without knowledge or intent to use genetic
5engineering.
6(3) An alcoholic beverage that is subject to the Alcoholic
7Beverage Control Act, set forth in Division 9 (commencing with
8Section 23000) of the Business and Professions Code.
9(4) Food sold at a storefront with 10 or fewer employees or a
10certified farmers’ market, field retail stand, or farm stand, as
11defined by Sections 47004, 47030, and 47050 of the Food and
12Agricultural Code.
13(d) Food is produced without knowledge or intent to use genetic
14engineering
under either of the following conditions:
15(1) The food is lawfully certified to be labeled, marketed, and
16offered for sale as “organic” pursuant to the federal Organic
17Foods Production Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. Sec. 6501 et seq.).
18(2) (A) An independent organization has determined that the
19food was produced without knowledge or intent to use genetic
20engineering and has been segregated from, and not knowingly or
21intentionally commingled with, foods that may have been
22genetically engineered.
23(B) The determination has been made pursuant to a sampling
24and testing procedure that (i) is consistent with sampling and
25testing principles recommended by internationally recognized
26standards organizations and (ii) does not rely on testing processed
27foods in which no DNA is detectable.
This article shall become operative on January 1,
292016.
The provisions of this act are severable. If any
31provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity
32shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given
33effect without the invalid provision or application.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
35Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
36the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
37district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
38infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
39for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
40the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
P9 1the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
2Constitution.
Section 25237 of the Business and Professions
4Code is amended to read:
It is unlawful to make any representation that a wine
6is produced entirely from grapes grown in the counties mentioned
7in Section 25236 unless the representation is true. This section
8shall apply to representations made on labels, bottles, advertising
9matter, letterheads, invoices, tags, signs, business cards, and all
10other representations of any kind
that are
oral, written, electronic,
11or printed.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
13Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
14the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
15district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
16infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
17for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
18the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
19the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
20Constitution.
O
98