BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS
AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
Senator Norma J. Torres, Chair
BILL NO: SB 1043 HEARING DATE: 4/22/14
AUTHOR: TORRES ANALYSIS BY: Frances Tibon
Estoista
AMENDED: AS INTRODUCED
FISCAL: YES
SUBJECT
Elections: in-lieu filing fee and political party qualification
petitions: penal provisions
DESCRIPTION
Existing law defines "party" as a political party or
organization that has qualified for participation in any primary
election.
Existing law specifies that every person charged with the
performance of any duty under any law of this state relating to
elections, who willfully neglects or refuses to perform it, or
who, in his or her official capacity, knowingly and fraudulently
acts in contravention or violation of any of those laws, is,
unless a different punishment is prescribed by law, punishable
by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by
imprisonment for 16 months or two or three years, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Specifically, these duties include
the circulation of nomination papers, declarations of candidacy,
initiatives, referendum, and recall petitions.
This bill defines "political party qualification petition" as a
petition circulated to qualify a political party.
This bill provides that any person found guilty of fraudulently
circulating an in-lieu-filing fee petition, or political party
qualification petition be subject to the same penal provisions
as a person found guilty of other forms of petition fraud.
BACKGROUND
Petition fraud is a crime prohibited by law. Existing law sets
specific penalties for people convicted of committing fraud
involving nomination papers, declarations of candidacy,
initiatives, referenda, and recall petitions. However,
in-lieu-filing-fee petitions and political party qualification
petitions are not specifically listed in the penalty provisions
of the Elections Code.
This lack of clarity has impacted recent Secretary of State
investigations. Though there was evidence in two recent cases
indicating a person had committed petition fraud, convictions
using these penalty provisions could not be obtained because the
law does not specifically address the kind of petition in
question in those cases.
COMMENTS
1. According to the Author : Existing law is not clear for
certain types of petitioning, and SB 1043 seeks to clarify
this problem. The lack of clarity in the law has impacted
recent Secretary of State investigations involving
in-lieu-filing-fee and party qualification petition cases.
Signature gatherers who deceive voters or collect signatures
in a fraudulent way should be penalized in all cases,
regardless of the type of petition they are circulating.
This bill simply extends the prohibitions on petition fraud to
apply to in-lieu-filing-fee petitions and party qualification
petitions, thereby closing a significant loophole in the
Elections Code.
POSITIONS
Sponsor: Secretary of State
Support: California Association of Clerks and Election
Officials (CACEO)
Oppose: None received
SB 1043 (TORRES)
Page 2