Amended in Assembly June 23, 2014

Amended in Senate April 7, 2014

Senate BillNo. 1054


Introduced by Senator Steinberg

February 18, 2014


An act to add Article 4 (commencing with Section 6045) to Chapter 5 of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal Code, relating to mentally ill criminalbegin delete offenders, and making an appropriation therefor.end deletebegin insert offenders.end insert

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1054, as amended, Steinberg. Mentally ill offender crime reduction grants.

Existing law establishes the Board of State and Community Corrections to collect and maintain available information and data about state and community correctional policies, practices, capacities, and needs, as specified.begin delete Existing law establishes the Recidivism Reduction Fund, to be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for activities designed to reduce the state’s prison population, including, but not limited to, reducing recidivism.end delete

This bill would require the board to administer and award mentally ill offender crime reduction grants on a competitive basis to counties that expand or establish a continuum of swift, certain, and graduated responses to reduce crime and criminal justice costs related to mentally illbegin insert juvenile and adultend insert offenders. The bill would require the board to establish minimum standards, funding schedules, and procedures for awarding grants.begin delete This bill would appropriate $50,000,000 from the Recidivism Reduction Fund in the 2014-15 fiscal year for the mentally ill offender crime reduction grant program, and require that half of that amount be used for adult offenders and half for juvenile offenders.end delete

Vote: begin delete23 end deletebegin insertmajorityend insert. Appropriation: begin deleteyes end deletebegin insertnoend insert. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of
2the following:

3(a) A share of the restored mentally ill offender crime reduction
4grants, with the enactment of this act, will be dedicated to
5improving mental health outcomes for children in the juvenile
6justice system.

7(b) While California’s youth crime rates are down overall in
8California, our courts and juvenile justice facilities are brimming
9with children and youth with a broad range of mental health
10disorders and unmet treatment needs.

11(c) In a 2005 “gap survey” of California probation chiefs, paving
12the way for the subsequent realignment of the Department of
13Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice
14population to local control, the chiefs identified juvenile mental
15health cases as the most significant problem and service gap they
16faced. In a later study, Chief Probation Officers of California
17documented long stays and high costs related to the detention of
18juveniles with mental health problems. State and national studies
19confirm, again and again, extremely high rates of mental health
20disorders among incarcerated youth, with prevalence exceeding
2170 percent of juveniles in custody. Data from the Board of State
22and Community Corrections in 2013 documents the fact that nearly
23half of the daily 8,200 juveniles in custody or on electronic
24monitoring in California have “open mental health cases.”

25(d) When the mental health needs of young offenders are
26ignored, these youth enter a high-risk zone of becoming chronic
27adult offenders, committing further crimes, and filling up our
28already crowded prisons and jails. This comes at a cost in public
29safety, a cost to the probation, court, and corrections agencies who
30must then deal expensively with the problem on a long-term basis
31at the deep end of our jail and prison systems, and a cost to the
32taxpayers.

33(e) We know that early intervention in these youth mental health
34cases is a key to success. The mentally ill offender crime reduction
35grant program investment on the juvenile justice side is an
P3    1investment in crime prevention. The juvenile justice share of the
2mentally ill offender crime reduction grants will support local
3investment in proven best-practices, including early diagnoses,
4family and community-based treatment models, specialized mental
5health courts, and other collaborative models of intervention that
6have proven to be successful. The goal, overall, is to break the link
7between mental illness and crime as soon as possible, using
8state-of-the-art assessment and intervention strategies. Early
9recognition and treatment in these cases is also critical to our goal
10of preventing the escalation of youth mental health disorders into
11tragedies like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting that
12occurred in 2012.

13(f) Modern science tells us that children are developmentally
14different from adults. This finding has been embedded in decisions
15of the United States Supreme Court in recent years, placing limits
16on the death penalty and other punishments imposed on children.
17In the foster care sector, important cases like the Katie A. litigation
18recognize the need for more effective strategies and collaborative
19efforts to address the mental health needs of children without
20homes of their own.

21(g) The good news is that science and evidence-based studies
22point the way to interventions that can stop the cycle of mental
23illness and crime early in these young lives. The new mentally ill
24offender crime reduction grants will prioritize funding for local
25assessments and interventions that promise to produce better youth
26outcomes, to lower youth recidivism rates, and to reduce system
27workloads and costs that result from failing to address the problem.

28(h) Research indicates that a continuum of responses for
29mentally ill offenders that includes prevention, intervention, and
30incarceration can reduce crime, jail overcrowding, and criminal
31justice costs.

32(i) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature that grants be
33provided to counties that develop and implement a comprehensive,
34cost-effective plan to reduce the rate of crime and offenses
35committed by persons with serious mental illness and reduce jail
36overcrowding and local criminal justice costs related to mentally
37ill offenders.

38

SEC. 2.  

Article 4 (commencing with Section 6045) is added
39to Chapter 5 of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal Code, to read:

 

P4    1Article 4.  Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction Grants
2

 

3

6045.  

The Board of State and Community Corrections shall
4administer and award mentally ill offender crime reduction grants
5on a competitive basis to counties that expand or establish a
6continuum of swift, certain, and graduated responses to reduce
7crime and criminal justice costs related to mentally ill offenders,
8as defined inbegin insert subdivision (a),end insert paragraph (1) of subdivisionbegin delete (b)end deletebegin insert (b),end insert
9 and subdivision (c) of Section 5600.3 of the Welfare and
10Institutions Code.

11

6045.2.  

(a) To be eligible for a grant, a county shall establish
12a strategy committee that shall include, at a minimum, the sheriff
13or director of the county department of corrections in a county in
14which the sheriff is not in charge of administering the county jail
15system, who shall chair the committee, representatives from other
16local law enforcement agencies, the chief probation officer, the
17county mental health director, a superior court judge, abegin insert formerend insert
18 client of a mental health treatment facility, and representatives
19from organizations that can provide, or have provided, treatment
20or stability, including income, housing, and caretaking, for persons
21with mental illnesses.

22(b) The committee shall develop a comprehensive plan for
23providing a cost-effective continuum of graduated responses,
24including prevention, intervention, and incarceration, for mentally
25ill offenders. Strategies for prevention and intervention shall
26include, but are not limited to, both of the following:

27(1) Mental health or substance abuse treatment for mentally ill
28offenders who have been released from law enforcement custody.

29(2) The establishment of long-term stability for mentally ill
30offenders who have been released from law enforcement custody,
31including a stable source of income, a safe and decent residence,
32and a conservator or caretaker.

33(c) The plan shall include the identification of specific outcome
34and performance measures and a plan for annual reporting that
35will allow the Board of State and Community Corrections to
36evaluate, at a minimum, the effectiveness of the strategies in
37 reducing crime and offenses committed by mentally ill offenders
38and the criminal justice costs related to mentally ill offenders.

39

6045.4.  

The Board of State and Community Corrections shall
40award grants that provide funding for four years. Funding shall be
P5    1used to supplement, rather than supplant, funding for existing
2programs. The funds may be used to fund specialized alternative
3custody programs that offer appropriate mental health treatment
4and services. A grant shall not be awarded unless the applicant
5makes available resources in an amount equal to at least 25 percent
6of the amount of the grant. Resources may include in-kind
7contributions from participating agencies. In awarding grants,
8priority shall be given to those proposals that include additional
9funding that exceeds 25 percent of the amount of the grant.

10

6045.6.  

The Board of State and Community Corrections shall
11establish minimum standards, funding schedules, and procedures
12for awarding grants, which shall take into consideration, but not
13be limited to, all of the following:

14(a) Percentage of the jail population with severe mental illness.

15(b) Demonstrated ability to administer the program.

16(c) Demonstrated ability to develop effective responses to
17provide treatment and stability for persons with severe mental
18illness.

19(d) Demonstrated history of maximizing federal, state, local,
20and private funding sources.

21(e) Likelihood that the program will continue to operate after
22state grant funding ends.

23

6045.8.  

(a) The Board of State and Community Corrections
24shall create an evaluation design for mentally ill offender crime
25reduction grants that will assess the effectiveness of the program
26in reducing crime, the number of early releases due to jail
27overcrowding, and local criminal justice costs.

28(b) Commencing on June 30, 2015, and annually thereafter, the
29board shall submit a report to the Legislature based on the
30evaluation design, with a final report due on December 31, 2019.

31(c) The reports submitted pursuant to this section shall be
32submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
33Code.

34(d) Pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, this
35section is repealed as of January 1, 2024.

begin delete
36

SEC. 3.  

There is hereby appropriated from the Recidivism
37Reduction Fund, established in Section 1233.9 of the Penal Code,
38in the 2014-15 fiscal year, fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) for
39use by the Board of State and Community Corrections to provide
40grants and administer the Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction
P6    1Grant Program. One-half of the money shall be used for adult
2offenders and one-half of the money shall be used for juvenile
3offenders.

end delete


O

    97