BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1054
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 2, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                  SB 1054 (Steinberg) - As Amended:  June 23, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                             Public  
          SafetyVote:7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill re-establishes Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction  
          (MIOCR) grants to be administered by the Board of State and  
          Community Corrections (BSCC).  Specifically, this bill:   

          1)Requires BSCC to administer and award mentally ill offender  
            crime reduction grants on a competitive basis to counties, and  
            to establish minimum standards, funding schedules, and  
            procedures for awarding grants.

          2)Requires an eligible county to establish a strategy committee,  
            as specified, to develop a plan for providing a cost-effective  
            continuum of graduated responses, including prevention,  
            intervention, and incarceration, for mentally ill offenders.  

          3)Requires BSCC to award grants that provide funding for four  
            years. Requires a local in-kind match of at least 25% of the  
            amount of the grant.

          4)Requires BSCC to create an evaluation design for grants, as  
            specified.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Until June 23, this bill included a $50 million appropriation.  
          The 2014-15 budget, however, includes $18 million from the  
          Recidivism Reduction Fund for MIOCR grants, and the  
          appropriation in this bill was removed by the author. 

          The public safety budget trailer bill (AB 1468) specifies up to  
          5% of the appropriation ($900,000) may be used for  








                                                                  SB 1054
                                                                  Page  2

          administrative costs.   

          As the chaptered budget bill contains similar language to this  
          bill, including the same lengthy findings and declarations, this  
          bill is not necessary. This bill, however, like AB 1468, does  
          create significant pressure to continue funding MIOCR grants  
          beyond the one-time funding included in the budget.     

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . The author cites positive evaluations of the MIOCR  
            program, which was established in 1998 and provided grants up  
            to 2008, and the need to create additional services for  
            counties to deal with the realigned correctional population,  
            as the basis for re-establishing MIOCR. 

           2)MIOCR Evaluation.  The 2005 MIOCR Grant Program: Overview of  
            Statewide Evaluation Findings, reported favorable outcomes  
            regarding the $80 million expended on 30 projects in 26  
            counties.  "The statewide research found a clear and  
            compelling advantage for the overarching MIOCR grant strategy  
            emphasizing accurate diagnosis, timely services, close  
            offender monitoring, and postcustody aftercare interventions.  
            In addition to the findings of this research, the case studies  
            required in counties' final evaluation reports and project  
            staff assessments of the most effective elements of their  
            programs yielded strong commonality that the following 10  
            strategies worked best in helping mentally ill offenders avoid  
            further involvement in the criminal justice system.

            � Interagency Collaboration
            � Intensive Case Management
            � Involvement of the Courts
            � Mental Health Courts
            � Assistance Securing Benefits
            � Assistance Arranging Housing
            � Medication Management
            � Use of a Center or Clinic
            � Assistance with Transportation
            � Peer Support  

           3)Support  . The California State Association of Counties (CSAC)  
            states, "Now, more than ever, counties are uniquely positioned  
            to serve the lower-level offender population by blending the  
            provision of corrections, substance abuse treatment, mental  








                                                                  SB 1054
                                                                  Page  3

            health services and social services programs to ensure better  
            public safety outcomes.  Counties are seeking the tools and  
            local flexibility that we need to combat recidivism, rebuild  
            families, and create safe communities."

           4)Prior Legislation  :  

              a)   AB 1811 (Laird), Chapter 48, Statutes of 2006, provided  
               funding for MIOCR grants through 2008.

             b)   SB 1485 (Rosenthal), Chapter 501, Statutes of 1998,  
               required BOC to administer and award MIOCR grants until  
               January 1, 2005.

             c)   SB 2108 (Vasconcellos), Chapter 502, Statutes of 1998,  
               amended the 1998-99 Budget Act to provide funds to BOC for  
               MIOCR grants.

           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081