BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT BILL NO: SB 1071
Norma Torres, Chair HEARING DATE: April 21, 2014
SB 1071 (Beall) as introduced 2/19/14 FISCAL: NO
STATE EXCLUDED EMPLOYEES' BILL OF RIGHTS: SENIORITY-BASED
SHIFTS
HISTORY :
Sponsors: California Correctional Supervisor's Organization
(Co-Sponsor)
California Correctional Peace Officers'
Association (Co-Sponsor)
Other legislation: AB 697 (Maldonado), 2003
Vetoed by Governor
AB 2839 (Kehoe), 2002
Vetoed by Governor
SUMMARY :
This bill would provide state excluded supervisory employees
in state departments operating two or more work shifts per
day the right to obtain work shifts based on seniority. The
shift selection rights would apply only to 60 percent of the
positions within the same classification scheduled for a
shift.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS :
1)Existing law :
a) requires, in the Bill of Rights for State Excluded
Employees (BRSEE), that the state meet and confer with
employee organizations which represent state employees
excluded from collective bargaining (supervisor,
managers, and confidential employees).
b) defines "meet and confer" for purposes of BRSEE to
mean that the state must consider, as fully as the
employer deems reasonable, excluded employee
organizations' presentations prior to reaching a
decision.
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 10, 2014 Page
1
c) allows represented state employees (but not excluded
employees) to have the right to obtain their preferred
work shifts based on their seniority if preferential
shift selection rights are part of their bargaining
contracts.
2)This bill :
a) establishes a right for state excluded employees who
are supervisors and whose workplace operates two or more
work shifts per day to obtain their preferred work
shifts based on their seniority.
b) provides that the preferred shift selection rights
would apply only to 60 percent of the positions within
the same classification scheduled for a shift; for
example, if 20 correctional supervisors were required to
work a particular work shift, management would have to
assign 12 of those positions based on seniority but
would be able to assign the other 8 at its discretion.
COMMENTS :
1)Arguments in Support :
According to the author's office, excluded employees are
"bounced around from one shift to another without any
control. This lack of control of work hours causes great
stress to the employees and their families. Additionally,
this situation can perpetuate favoritism and undue
reprisals-in the form of shift changes-against excluded
employees a manager might not like."
The California Correctional Supervisor's Organization states
that "this is a reasonable measure that meets the needs of
excluded employees who must perform shift work."
According to California Correctional Peace Officers'
Association, "under our current collective bargaining
agreement, correctional peace officers are assigned shifts
and assignments based on a detailed program included within
out contract. However, upon promotion to supervisor,
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 10, 2014 Page
2
sergeants and lieutenants lose the advantages of the current
program." "SB 1071 strikes a reasonable balance between
management's need to control supervisory assignments and the
need for supervisors to have some predictability over their
work schedules."
2)SUPPORT :
California Correctional Supervisor's Organization,
Co-Sponsor
California Correctional Peace Officers' Association,
Co-Sponsor
Association of California State Supervisors (ACSS)
3)OPPOSITION :
None on file.
#####
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 10, 2014 Page
3