BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 1082 (Huff) - Parent Resources Website
          
          Amended: April 9, 2014          Policy Vote: Education 8-0 
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: April 28, 2014                                 
          Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-Hernandez                       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 

          
          Bill Summary: SB 1082 requires the California Department of  
          Education (CDE) to create a dedicated parent resources Internet  
          website that provides specified information concerning public  
          education and specified school level data.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Website design/creation: $150,000 (General Fund) in  
              one-time contracting costs to create a website meeting the  
              requirements of this bill, including the specifications of  
              the searchable database and posting the LCAPs. Costs would  
              increase if the CDE hire new staff to build the website.
              Website maintenance: Significant on-going costs and staff  
              time, likely in the low tens of thousands of dollars  
              annually, to update the website and database to stay  
              current.

          Background: Various state and federal laws govern state and  
          local responsibilities to public school students, and those  
          students' educational entitlements. Pertinent to this bill, are:

           Open Enrollment Act:  Enacted as a way to improve student  
          achievement and enhance parental choice in education, the Open  
          Enrollment Act provides options to certain pupils to enroll in  
          public schools throughout the state without regard to their  
          residence. It gives students enrolled in one of the 1,000 Open  
          Enrollment schools, identified by the Superintendent of Public  
          Instruction using statutory criteria, the option to enroll in a  
          school within the same district or any other district with a  
          higher Academic Performance Index (API) score than the pupil's  
          school of residence. 
          (Education Code � 48350 et. seq.)
           








          SB 1082 (Huff)
          Page 1


          School Districts of Choice:  Existing law authorizes  
          inter-district transfers known as "school districts of choice"  
          in which the governing board of a school district may declare  
          the district to be a district of choice that is willing to  
          accept a specified number of inter-district transfer pupils. A  
          district that elects to participate must admit students through  
          a random process that prohibits enrollment based on academic or  
          athletic performance.  School districts of choice must give  
          priority for attendance to siblings of pupils already in  
          attendance in that district. A district of choice may reject the  
          transfer of a pupil if that transfer would require the district  
          to create a new program to serve that pupil, but prohibits a  
          district of choice from rejecting the transfer of special needs  
          pupils, individuals with exceptional needs, and English  
          learners. These provisions sunset on July 1, 2016. (EC � 48300  
          et. seq.)  

          Parent Empowerment Act:  Authorizes parents of certain low  
          achieving schools to petition, as specified, for the  
          implementation of one of five specific intervention models: 1)  
          Transformation model; 2) Turnaround model; 3) Restart model; 4)  
          School closure; and, 5) Alternative governance pursuant to the  
          federal No Child Left Behind Act 
          (EC � 53202 and 20 United States Code Section 6301, Section  
          1116(b)(8)(B)(v))
           
          Unsafe Schools:  The Unsafe School Choice Option (USCO) (section  
          9532 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of  
          1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB))  
          requires that each state receiving funds under the ESEA  
          establish and implement a statewide policy requiring that  
          students attending a persistently dangerous public elementary or  
          secondary school, or students who become victims of a violent  
          criminal offense while in or on the grounds of a public school  
          that they attend, be allowed to attend a "safe" public school.  
          As a condition of receiving ESEA funds, each state must certify  
          in writing to the Secretary of Education that the state is in  
          compliance with these requirements.  

          Local Control Accountability Plans (LCAP):  As part of the 2013  
          Budget Act, the Legislature enacted the Local Control Funding  
          Formula (LCFF), which is designed to provide districts and  
          charter schools with the bulk of their resources in unrestricted  
          funding to support the basic educational program for all  








          SB 1082 (Huff)
          Page 2


          students. The LCFF includes new requirements for local planning  
          and accountability, including the creation of an LCAP for each  
          school district and charter school, which focus on improving  
          student outcomes in state educational priorities and ensuring  
          engagement of parents, students, teachers, school employees, and  
          the public in the local process. The LCAP must include locally  
          determined goals, actions, services, and expenditures of LCFF  
          funds for each school year in support of the state educational  
          priorities that are specified in statute, as well as any  
          additional local priorities. In adopting the LCAP, school  
          districts must consult with parents, students, teachers, and  
          other school employees.
          
          There are 8 state priorities that must be addressed in the LCAP,  
          for all students and significant student subgroups in a school  
          district and at each school: 1) Williams settlement issues; 2)  
          implementation of academic content standards; 3) parental  
          involvement; 4) pupil achievement; 5) pupil engagement (as  
          measured by attendance, graduation, and dropout data); 6) school  
          climate (in part measured by suspension and expulsion rates); 7)  
          the extent to which students have access to a broad course of  
          study; 8) pupil outcomes for non-state-assessed courses of  
          study.

          Proposed Law: This bill requires the CDE to create a parent  
          resources website that contains information on the following  
          public school options, including but not limited to: a) The Open  
          Enrollment Act; b) school districts of choice, as specified; c)  
          parent empowerment options, as specified; d) schools identified  
          as by the State Board of Education pursuant to the USCO as part  
          of NCLB; and, e) charter schools. 

          This bill further requires the website to contain information  
          related to eligibility for specific public school options based  
          on the school and school district of residence, and that it  
          include relevant information to individual schools in a  
          searchable database.

          This bill requires the website to contain school districts and  
          school level reports on pupil outcomes, including but not  
          limited to: a) standardized test scores, including, the Academic  
          Performance Index, Adequate Yearly Progress, Standardized  
          Testing and Reporting, and Measurement of Academic Performance  
          and Progress; b) graduation rates; and, c) school accountability  








          SB 1082 (Huff)
          Page 3


          report cards (SARCs). 
           
           This bill encourages the CDE to provide the specified  
          information in both English and Spanish.

          Staff Comments: This bill requires the CDE to create a dedicated  
          parent website, with specified features that would allow parents  
          to more easily access information about their children's  
          schools, school district priorities, and enrollment options.  
          Certain information, such as enrollment options, is required to  
          be provided in a searchable database specific to the child's  
          residence. The CDE estimates that it would cost $150,000  
          (General Fund) in one-time (likely contract) costs to create a  
          website meeting the various requirements of this bill. 

          The website will need to be maintained and updated. Certain  
          information, such as API scores and graduation rates, is already  
          reported to the CDE in the SARC. Other information would have to  
          be sought out by the CDE, such as any changes to local  
          enrollment options (e.g. new charter schools established) for  
          each of the more than 1,000 school districts in the state or  
          changes to a school district's LCAP. Significant on-going staff  
          time, potentially up to a .5 FTE, will be required to update the  
          website and database for the life of the website.