BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 1100 (Hernandez) - Continuity of care.
          
          Amended: April 3, 2014          Policy Vote: Health 7-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: May 23, 2014      Consultant: Brendan McCarthy
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          
          Bill Summary: SB 1100 would allow new enrollees in an individual  
          market health plan or health insurance policy to continue to  
          receive treatment for certain conditions from their existing  
          provider if the existing provider is not in the new health plan  
          or health insurance policy network.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Likely costs in the tens of thousands to low hundreds of  
              thousands per year for review of insurance plan documents,  
              responding to consumer complaints, and taking enforcement  
              actions by the Department of Insurance (Insurance Fund).

              One-time costs of about $160,000 in 2014-15 and $80,000 in  
              2015-16, and ongoing costs of about $40,000 per year  
              thereafter for review of health plan documents, responding  
              to consumer complaints, and taking enforcement actions by  
              the Department of Managed Health Care (Managed Care Fund).

              No anticipated impact on the Medi-Cal program. Under  
              current law and practice, Medi-Cal managed care plans are  
              already required to provide continuity of care for new  
              enrollees as would be required under this bill.

          Background: Under current law, health insurers are regulated by  
          the Department of Insurance and health plans are regulated by  
          the Department of Managed Health Care. Current law generally  
          requires health insurers and managed care plans (collectively  
          referred to as "carriers") to provide "continuity of care" for  
          enrollees who have certain medical conditions. Specified medical  
          conditions requiring continuity of care include acute  
          conditions, serious chronic conditions, pregnancy, terminal  
          illness, care of a newborn child, or a surgery that has been  
          authorized.








          SB 1100 (Hernandez)
          Page 1



          Under this requirement, if carrier terminates a contract with a  
          medical provider, the insurer or health plan must continue to  
          provide coverage for services provided by the terminated  
          provider for specified time periods. Current law generally does  
          not extend continuity of care requirements to newly covered  
          enrollees who have an individual subscriber agreement (i.e. a  
          consumer who has bought a health plan in the individual market)  
          or to enrollees in a health insurance plan.

          AB 369 (Pan, Statutes of 2013) allows certain new enrollees in a  
          health plan or health insurance policy to continue to receive  
          treatment for certain conditions from their existing provider if  
          the existing provider is not in the new health plan or health  
          insurance policy network. AB 369 made a special exception from  
          the current limitations on continuity of care laws for  
          individuals whose prior health care coverage had been cancelled  
          between December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014 because that  
          coverage did not comply with requirements in state law  
          implementing health care coverage market reforms in the federal  
          Affordable Care Act.

          Proposed Law: SB 1100 would allow new enrollees in a health plan  
          or health insurance policy to continue to receive treatment for  
          certain conditions from their existing provider if the existing  
          provider is not in the new health plan or health insurance  
          policy network.

          Under the bill, carriers would be authorized to pay  
          non-participating providers at the same rates and terms as a  
          imposed on participating providers. If the provider does not  
          wish to provide services under those terms and cannot agree to  
          other terms with the carrier, the provider would not be  
          obligated to continue to provide services under the bill.
          
          In cases where a new enrollee has a health insurance policy and  
          the existing provider agrees to continue to provide care under  
          the bill, the provider would have to accept payment from the  
          insurer as payment in full for services. The provider would be  
          prohibited from billing the patient for any amount in excess of  
          the insurer's reimbursement rate, except for copayments and/or  
          deductibles allowed under the insurance policy.

          Essentially, this bill would extend existing continuity of care  








          SB 1100 (Hernandez)
          Page 2


          requirements to all individuals purchasing health care coverage  
          in the individual market.

          Related Legislation: 
              AB 369 (Pan, Statutes of 2013) allows certain new enrollees  
              in a health plan or health insurance policy to continue to  
              receive treatment for certain conditions from their existing  
              provider if the existing provider is not in the new health  
              plan or health insurance policy network.
              AB 1507 (Logue) would allow an individual or small employer  
              health plan in effect on October 1, 2013 to continue to be  
              in effect until December 31, 2014. That bill is pending in  
              the Assembly Health Committee.

          Staff Comments: The only costs that may be incurred by a local  
          agency relate to crimes and infractions. Under the California  
          Constitution, such costs are not reimbursable by the state.