BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1111|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1111
          Author:   Lara (D)
          Amended:  4/21/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  6-1, 4/24/14
          AYES:  Liu, Block, Galgiani, Hancock, Hueso, Monning
          NOES:  Huff
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland, Correa

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 5/23/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Gaines


           SUBJECT  :    Pupils:  involuntary transfer

            SOURCE  :     American Civil Liberties Union
                      Children Now
                      Public Counsel
                      Youth Justice Coalition 
                      Youth Law Center


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires parental consent for referrals to  
          a county community school by a school attendance review board  
          (SARB), school district, or probation department, except for  
          situations where a student is expelled or pursuant to a court  
          order. This bill also establishes the right of a student to  
          reenroll in his/her former school or another school upon  
          completion of the term of involuntary transfer to a county  
          community school.
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1111
                                                                     Page  
          2


           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides for various educational  
          options outside of a traditional comprehensive public school,  
          for students who are expelled from traditional schools or  
          referred to them by a SARB or probation officer.

          The governing board of a school district (GBSD), at the time  
          expulsion is ordered, must ensure that an educational program is  
          provided to the pupil.  The district or county program  
          (community day schools or community schools, respectively) is  
          the only program required to be provided to expelled pupils.   
          Each GBSD may elect to provide additional programmatic options. 

          Pupils expelled from school for serious offenses such as  
          possessing a firearm, brandishing a knife, causing serious  
          physical injury, selling a controlled substance or committing a  
          sexual assault are prohibited from enrolling in any school other  
          than a community school, community day school, or juvenile court  
          school.

          A county board of education is authorized to maintain one or  
          more community schools to serve pupils who have been expelled,  
          referred by probation or an attendance review board, or are  
          homeless.  

          Existing law provides that juvenile court schools are public  
          schools or classes operated by the county superintendent of  
          schools in juvenile halls, homes, day centers, ranches, camps,  
          and youth correctional facilities.  

          Existing law requires the GBSD to recommend a plan of  
          rehabilitation for the pupil at the time of the expulsion order,  
          which may include periodic review as well as assessment at the  
          time of review for readmission.  The plan may also include  
          recommendations for improved academic performance, tutoring,  
          special education assessments, job training, counseling,  
          employment, community service, or other programs.  

          The GBSDs are further required to set a date, not later than the  
          last day of the semester following the semester in which the  
          expulsion occurred, when the pupil shall be reviewed for  
          readmission to a school within the district or the school the  
          pupil last attended.  


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1111
                                                                     Page  
          3

          The GBSDs are required to set a date of one year from the date  
          the expulsion occurred for a pupil who has been expelled for:   
          (a) possessing, selling, or furnishing a firearm; (b)  
          brandishing a knife at another person; (c) unlawfully selling a  
          controlled substance; (d) committing or attempting to commit a  
          sexual assault; or, (e) possession of an explosive.  

          Existing law requires each school district to adopt rules and  
          regulations establishing a procedure for the filing and  
          processing of requests for readmission and the process for the  
          required review of all expelled pupils for readmission.  

          The GBSD may permit, after the term of expulsion, the enrollment  
          of a pupil expelled from another district for one of the most  
          serious offenses if the SARB determines the pupil no longer  
          poses a threat.  

          The GBSD that receives a request for enrollment from a pupil who  
          has been expelled from another school district, for acts other  
          than the most serious offenses, must hold a hearing to determine  
          whether the individual poses a continuing danger to pupils or  
          employees.  If the SARB finds the pupil does not pose a danger,  
          the pupil must be permitted to enroll if the pupil has  
          established residence in the district or enrolled pursuant to an  
          interdistrict agreement.  

          Existing law prohibits a pupil from being denied enrollment or  
          readmission to a public school solely on the basis that he/she  
          has had contact with the juvenile justice system, including  
          arrest, adjudication by a juvenile court, supervision by a  
          probation officer, detention in a juvenile facility, or  
          enrollment in a juvenile court school.  

          A GBSD, upon voting to expel a pupil, may suspend the  
          enforcement of the expulsion order for up to one calendar year  
          and may, as a condition of the suspension of the enforcement,  
          assign the pupil to a school, class or program that is deemed  
          appropriate for the rehabilitation of the pupil.  Upon  
          satisfactory completion of the rehabilitation assignment, the  
          GBSD must reinstate the pupil in a school within the district  
          and may also order the expungement of any or all records of the  
          expulsion proceedings.  

          This bill:

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1111
                                                                     Page  
          4


          1. Makes numerous changes to statute and practice governing  
             pupil transfers to county community schools by districts,  
             SARBs, and probation officials; revises the list of pupils  
             who may be involuntarily enrolled in a county community  
             school to limit the kind of probation referrals and remove  
             homeless children; and requires the consent of the pupil's  
             parent or guardian for the enrollment of a pupil who is  
             referred as the result of a recommendation by a SARB. 

          2. Requires, based on the educational assessment or  
             rehabilitation plan of a student, the student to be enrolled  
             in or have access to programs either at the school or through  
             community organizations:  (a) counseling; (b) mental health  
             counseling or other support services; (c) access to services  
             necessary to transition the student back to his or her prior  
             school or to another comprehensive school; (d) mediation,  
             conflict resolution, or alternative behavior interventions;  
             and (e) supplemental services to assist with passage of the  
             high school exit exam.

          3. Provides a pupil who is involuntarily enrolled in a county  
             community school the right to reenroll in his/her former  
             school or another comprehensive school immediately after  
             being readmitted from expulsion or court-ordered placement,  
             as specified.  Prohibits imposition of additional academic or  
             behavioral criteria or conditions that extends the duration  
             of the placement of a pupil in a county community school  
             beyond the terms of the initial or subsequent expulsion order  
             from being added.

          4. Requires, with regard to an expulsion hearing, upon the  
             decision of a hearing officer or administrative panel not to  
             expel a student, a student is permitted to return to the  
             classroom instructional program from which the expulsion  
             referral was made, unless the parent, guardian or responsible  
             adult requests another school placement in writing.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes


          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1111
                                                                     Page  
          5


            County community schools  .  Potentially significant ongoing  
            savings, to the extent that students that will have enrolled  
            in county community schools instead of attending traditional  
            schools.


            Mandate:  Individual education services  .  To the extent that  
            this bill expands a local education agency's (LEA's) role in  
            providing or securing services related to a pupil's  
            educational assessment, those additional activities may  
            constitute a reimbursable state mandate.  

            Mandate:  Expulsion procedures  .  This bill creates a new  
            mandate on LEAs by changing expulsion hearing requirements.   
            The long-term result is likely minor ongoing savings, but  
            there may be one-time reimbursable costs to change LEA  
            process, materials and training.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/22/14)

          American Civil Liberties Union (co-source)
          Children Now (co-source)
          Public Counsel (co-source)
          Youth Justice Coalition (co-source)
          Youth Law Center (co-source)
          Advancement Project
          Black Parallel School Board
          Centro CHA, Inc.
          Children's Defense Fund-California
          Families in Good Health
          Fight Crime, Invest in Kids
          Gay-Straight Alliance Network
          Labor/Community Strategy Center
          Legal Services for Children
          Los Angeles County Office of Education
          Mills Legal Clinic
          National Association of Social Workers 
          National Center for Youth Law
          Peace Over Violence
          Policy Link
          San Francisco Counsel for Families and Children
          Strategy Center
          W. Haywood Burns Institute

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1111
                                                                     Page  
          6

          Youth and Education Law Project, Mills Legal Clinic

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Sponsors of this bill indicate that  
          this bill intends to establish a clear and transparent transfer  
          process with built-in safeguards to reduce improper transfers  
          and ensure that both students and parents have a meaningful say  
          in the student's academic success.  The confusion around the  
          transfer process and lack of safeguards for students who desire  
          to return to a traditional school has resulted in too many  
          students either leaving school altogether or attending a school  
          that cannot meet their educational needs.  Such transfers  
          disproportionally affect students of color who make up a  
          majority of these schools' populations.  According to the  
          sponsors, while county community schools are only supposed to be  
          short-term placements, students who have been involuntarily  
          transferred are either prohibited from returning to a  
          comprehensive school or are faced with hurdles to returning to a  
          district school.


          PQ:d  5/25/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****




















                                                                CONTINUED