BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1151|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1151
          Author:   Cannella (R), et al.
          Amended:  6/23/14
          Vote:     21


           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 4/22/14
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso,  
            Lara, Liu, Pavley, Roth
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 5/5/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Padilla

           SENATE FLOOR  :  32-0, 5/12/14
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Corbett,  
            Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Fuller, Galgiani, Hancock,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu,  
            Mitchell, Morrell, Padilla, Pavley, Roth, Steinberg, Torres,  
            Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Evans, Gaines, Knight, Monning,  
            Nielsen, Wright, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/14/14 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT :    Vehicles:  school zone fines

           SOURCE  :     Safe Routes to School National Partnership


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1151
                                                                     Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill imposes an additional $35 fine for  
          specified violations occurring in school zones and directs  
          revenue from the fine to the state's Active Transportation  
          Program (ATP).

           Assembly Amendments  remove "during school sponsored events" from  
          this bill's provisions thereby making the additional penalties  
          applicable only when children are entering or exiting during  
          school hours or the noon recess.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes a speed limit of 25 mph  
          when approaching or passing a school building or school grounds.  
           This speed limit applies while children are entering or exiting  
          during school hours or the noon recess period; in cases of  
          school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a  
          fence, gate, or other physical barrier, while the grounds are in  
          use by children; and where the highway is posted with a standard  
          "SCHOOL" warning sign.  This sign may be posted at any distance  
          up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

          Existing law governs speed limits and imposes fines for speeding  
          violations.  Existing law authorizes a local authority, upon  
          determining via an engineering and traffic survey that the speed  
          limit of 25 mph in a particular school zone is too high to be  
          reasonable or safe, to establish a prima facie speed limit of  
          either 20 or 15 mph, as deemed appropriate by the survey.   
          Existing law also authorizes doubling of fines for speed limit  
          violations in highway construction or maintenance zones, under  
          certain circumstances.

          The Judicial Council annually adopts a uniform traffic penalty  
          schedule for all non-parking infractions outlined in the Vehicle  
          Code.  Existing law establishes the base fine for speeding in a  
          school zone as $35 for traveling 1 mph to 15 mph over the speed  
          limit ($238 total fine with fees and court costs), $70 for  
          traveling 16 mph to 25 mph over the speed limit ($367 total fine  
          with fees and court costs), and $100 for traveling 26 mph or  
          more over the speed limit ($490 total fine with fees and court  
          costs).

          This bill:

          1.Imposes a $35 fine, in addition to the amount otherwise  
            prescribed and in addition to any other penalty assessments or  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1151
                                                                     Page  
          3

            fees, for most major offenses committed by the driver of a  
            vehicle under either of the following conditions:

             A.   When passing a school building or school grounds when  
               children are entering or exiting during school hours, or  
               the noon recess period; the building or grounds are  
               contiguous to a highway; and the highway is posted with  
               both a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign and an accompanying  
               sign notifying motorists that increased penalties apply for  
               traffic violations that are committed within that school  
               zone.

             B.   When passing school grounds that are in use by children;  
               the school grounds are not separated from the highway by a  
               fence, gate, or other physical barrier; and the highway is  
               posted with both a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign and an  
               accompanying sign notifying motorists that increased  
               penalties apply for traffic violations that are committed  
               within that school zone.

          1.Requires the additional fines authorized by this bill to be  
            deposited in the State Transportation Fund for purposes of  
            funding school zone safety projects within the ATP.

           Background
           
           ATP  .  The ATP, established by the 2013-14 Budget agreement,  
          consolidates several existing federal and state transportation  
          programs, including Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS), the Bicycle  
          Transportation Account, and others, to encourage increased use  
          of active modes of transportation.  The budget agreement funds  
          the ATP with $129.5 million ($34.2 million in state funds and  
          $95.3 million in federal funds).  Of these funds, the Caltrans'  
          California Traffic Control Devices Committee (CTCDC) will  
          distribute 40% to metropolitan planning organizations, 10% to  
          rural and small urban areas, and 50% on a statewide competitive  
          basis.  For each of these portions, 25% must be targeted for  
          disadvantaged communities.  The administration's original ATP  
          proposal aimed to streamline the application and review process  
          by establishing a single program within which all eligible  
          projects would compete.  The Budget agreement, however,  
          established a minimum funding level of $72 million total for  
          SRTS for fiscal years 2013-14 through 2015-16.  While this bill  
          does not specifically cite SRTS, it directs funds to "school  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1151
                                                                     Page  
          4

          zone safety projects" within the ATP.

          The CTCDC is an advisory body which reviews rules and  
          regulations relating to traffic control devices and makes  
          recommendations to the Caltrans Director, who ultimately adopts  
          and publishes rules and regulations.  The committee is made up  
          of representatives from Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol  
          (CHP), and local governments, and also consults with technical  
          advisors.  At its February 2014 meeting, the CTCDC considered a  
          proposal submitted by Caltrans to refine the definition of "when  
          children are present."  Caltrans noted that "Some local judges  
          are supporting citations issued during the entire school day -  
          even when the children are in the classroom and nowhere near the  
          roadway.  In other jurisdictions, the local police or CHP only  
          enforce the 25-mph speed limit during morning arrival and  
          afternoon departure time."  This item was postponed to the  
          CTCDC's May 14, 2014 meeting in order to give the CTCDC time to  
          discuss the issue with pedestrian advocacy groups.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Minor one-time costs to the Administrative Office of the  
            Courts to program the new Vehicle Code violation adding a $35  
            penalty to specified offenses committed in a school zone  
            (Trial Court Trust Fund).

           Minor costs to the Department of Transportation related to the  
            administration of additional funds deposited for use in the  
            ATP (State Highway Account).

           Unknown revenue gains related to the imposition of additional  
            fines (State Highway Account, for use on school safety  
            projects in the ATP).

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/14/14)

          Safe Routes to School National Partnership (source)
          Alameda County 
          Alliance for Community Research and Development
          American Heart Association
          California Bicycle Coalition

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1151
                                                                     Page  
          5

          California Equity Leaders Network
          California Federation of Teachers
          California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
          California State Association of Counties
          California State PTA
          California Walks
          Catholic Charities Diocese of Stockton
          Center for Human Services- Ceres Partnership for Healthy  
          Children
          City and County of San Francisco
          City of Goleta
          COAST Santa Barbara
          Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
          Fresno Economic Opportunities Commission
          Golden Valley High School
          Latino Coalition for a Healthy California 
          Los Angeles Unified School District
          Los Angeles Walks 
          Merced County Office of Education
          PolicyLink
          San Mateo County Transit District
          Sheriffs Community Impact
          Third and Fourth Streets Planning Communities
          TransForm
          Transportation Agency for Monterey County

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/14/14)

          Department of Finance
          National Motorists Association
          Safer Streets LA

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author states that many school  
          zones lack sufficient bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure,  
          such as adequate sidewalks, crosswalks, bicycle lanes, and  
          traffic signage, to enable children to travel safely to school.   
          The author notes that enabling children to walk or ride their  
          bikes to school helps combat obesity, and that both obesity and  
          pedestrian injury are statewide problems that are especially  
          prevalent in the Central Valley, communities of color, and  
          low-income areas.  In addition, drivers who do not observe  
          traffic laws create dangerous environments for children walking  
          near schools.  The author states that this bill will create a  
          heightened awareness of the value of children by increasing  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1151
                                                                     Page  
          6

          fines in school zones.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The National Motorists Association  
          states that funding education of drivers and school children  
          would be a more effective way to improve school zone safety than  
          assigning penalties and collecting fines.  Safer Streets L.A.,  
          states that rather than increasing penalties, which has been not  
          been shown to result in a decrease in collisions, the  
          Legislature should consider enhanced education and engineering  
          countermeasures to improve roadway safety for children traveling  
          to and from school.  The author states that this bill promotes  
          safer driving in school zones by both creating an additional  
          fine to enhance driver awareness and by directing the funds from  
          that fine to the ATP to help fund school zone safety projects.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Holden, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein,  
            Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. P�rez, V.  
            Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Roger Hern�ndez, Vacancy


          JA:e  8/14/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****









                                                                CONTINUED