BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair
SB 1168 (Pavley) - Groundwater management.
Amended: April 23, 2014 Policy Vote: NR&W 7-2
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: May 23, 2014 Consultant: Marie Liu
SUSPENSE FILE.
Bill Summary: SB 1168 would provide a very broad outline for the
development of sustainable groundwater management plans and
makes a number of definitions.
Fiscal Impact: Unknown, at least in the mid-hundreds of
thousands to millions of dollars annually, from the General Fund
for the state's oversight of groundwater management.
Background: Existing law allows certain existing local agencies
to develop groundwater management plans (Water Code �10750 et
seq.), which are commonly referred to as AB 3030 plans. These
plans must be developed with public hearings and only if less
than half of the landowners in the proposed district do not
protest the development of the plan. However, there is no
mandatory statewide system of groundwater management.
In January, the Governor released the California Water Action
Plan which includes a call to improve sustainable groundwater
management.
Proposed Law: This bill would establish the Sustainable
Groundwater Management Act which declares the Legislature's
intent to have all groundwater basins and subbasins managed by
local entities pursuant to an adopted sustainable groundwater
management plan.
This bill makes numerous definitions and provides a very
approximate outline of requirements for local groundwater
management plans and the local agencies which create the plans.
This bill also would allow the state to take action to cause a
plan to be developed, adopted, and implemented.
Related Legislation: AB 1739 (Dickenson) would require the
SB 1168 (Pavley)
Page 1
development of sustainable a groundwater management plan for
each groundwater basin in the state. AB 1739 is currently in
Assembly Appropriations.
Staff Comments: This bill does not include any detail on the
state's oversight responsibilities in local groundwater
management planning, including which department would be
responsible for these activities. Therefore, costs are unknown.
However, staff believes that it is reasonable to assume that the
state will need several positions for basic oversight functions,
for a minimum annual cost in the mid-hundreds of thousands of
dollars, though a more comprehensive program will likely cost
millions of dollars.