BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1168|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1168
Author: Pavley (D), et al.
Amended: 8/29/14
Vote: 21
SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER COMMITTEE : 7-2, 4/22/14
AYES: Pavley, Evans, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Monning, Wolk
NOES: Cannella, Fuller
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-2, 5/23/14
AYES: De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
NOES: Walters, Gaines
SENATE FLOOR : 24-12, 5/27/14
AYES: Beall, Block, Corbett, Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier,
Evans, Galgiani, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Jackson,
Lara, Leno, Lieu, Mitchell, Monning, Padilla, Pavley, Roth,
Steinberg, Torres, Wolk
NOES: Anderson, Berryhill, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Huff,
Knight, Morrell, Nielsen, Vidak, Walters, Wyland
NO VOTE RECORDED: Calderon, Liu, Wright, Yee
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not available
SUBJECT : Groundwater management
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill requires adoption of a sustainable
groundwater sustainability plan (GSP) by January 31, 2020, for
CONTINUED
SB 1168
Page
2
all high or medium priority basins that are subject to critical
conditions of overdraft and by January 31, 2022, for all other
high and medium priority basins unless the basin is legally
adjudicated or the local agency establishes it is otherwise
being sustainably managed.
Assembly Amendments add chaptering language with AB 1739
(Dickinson) and SB 1319 (Pavley); revise and recast the Senate
provisions relating to all groundwater basins and subbasins in
the state, enacting the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
(Act), and adopting a GSP.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
1.Provides the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water
Board) with broad powers to regulate the waste and
unreasonable use of water, including groundwater.
2.Categorizes groundwater as either a subterranean stream
flowing through a known and definite channel or percolating
groundwater. Groundwater that is a subterranean stream is
subject to the same State Water Board water right permitting
requirements as surface water. There is no statewide
permitting requirement for percolating groundwater, which is
the majority of groundwater.
3.Encourages local agencies to work cooperatively to manage
groundwater resources within their jurisdictions and, if not
otherwise required by law, to voluntarily adopt groundwater
management plans.
4.Requires that a groundwater management plan contain components
related to funding, management, and monitoring in order for a
local agency to be eligible for groundwater project funds
administered by the Department of Water Resources (DWR).
5.Allows a groundwater management plan to voluntarily contain
additional listed components.
6.Requires all of the groundwater basins identified in DWR's
Groundwater Report, Bulletin No. 118, to be regularly and
systematically monitored locally and the information to be
SB 1168
Page
3
readily and widely available.
7.Requires DWR to perform the groundwater elevation monitoring
function if no local entity will do so but then bars the
county and other entities eligible to monitor that basin from
receiving state water grants or loans.
8.Requires DWR to prioritize groundwater basins based on
multiple factors including, but not limited to, the level of
population and irrigated acreage relying on the groundwater
basin as a primary source of water and the current impacts on
the groundwater basin from overdraft, subsidence, saline
intrusion and other water quality degradation.
This bill:
1.Makes findings including, but not limited to, California's
high reliance on groundwater to meet its water needs; the
necessity of integrated surface and groundwater management in
order to meet the state's water management goals; and the
failed wells, deteriorated water quality, environmental
damage, and irreversible land subsidence that occur when
groundwater is not properly managed.
2.Establishes that it is the policy of the state that all
groundwater basins are managed sustainably for multiple
economic, social and environmental benefits and that such
management is best achieved locally based on best available
science.
3.Enacts the Act with the stated intent of empowering local
groundwater agencies to sustainably manage groundwater basins
through the development of GSPs.
4.Defines sustainable groundwater management, among other terms.
5.Encourages the voluntary participation of California Native
tribes and federal agencies in sustainable groundwater
management while preserving and acknowledging the federally
reserved rights of federally recognized Indian tribes.
6.Specifies that groundwater basins are those identified by the
DWR in Bulletin No. 118, as it may be amended, and includes
subbasins.
SB 1168
Page
4
7.Requires DWR, by January 31, 2015, to prioritize each basin as
either a high, medium, low, or very low priority using factors
under the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation
Monitoring (CASGEM) program that include, but are not limited
to: population, extent of public wells; overlying irrigated
acreage; reliance on groundwater; any documented impacts upon
the basin from overdraft, subsidence, saline intrusion and
other water quality degradation; or any other information
determined to be relevant by the department, including adverse
impacts on local habitat and local stream flows.
8.Requires that high and medium priority basins that are in a be
sustainably managed through a GSP but excepts:
A. Basins, or portions of basins, that were subject to a
groundwater adjudication; and
B. Basins that a local agency can demonstrate are already
being sustainably managed.
1.Encourages low and very low priority basins to manage through
a GSP but, should they voluntarily choose to do so, exempts
them from any State compliance actions.
2.Allows any local agency or combination of agencies to
establish a groundwater sustainability agency (GSA) for the
purpose of developing and implementing a GSP. Allows water
corporations regulated by the Public Utilities Commission to
participate in a GSA if the local agencies forming the GSA
approve.
3.Recognizes and lists special districts that were created in
legislation for the purpose of managing groundwater and makes
those districts the exclusive entities within their boundaries
with authority to comply with the Act, unless they choose to
opt out.
4.Allows a city or county to be the GSA or, in the case of an
area where no local agency has assumed management, presumes
the county to be the GSA unless the county opts out. If the
county opts out and there is no other local agency, requires
reporting of groundwater extractions directly to the State
Water Board.
SB 1168
Page
5
5.Requires a local agency or combination of local agencies that
is electing to be, or forming, a GSA to notify DWR of the
intent to be a GSA and provide a notice to DWR that includes
the proposed boundaries of the GSA, among other information.
Requires DWR to post the notice to its Internet Web site.
6.Following public notice, a public hearing, and final action to
become a GSA, requires the GSA to notify DWR within 30 days
and include copies of pertinent documents, as specified.
Requires DWR to post the final notice and documents to its
Internet Web site. Ninety days following posting by DWR, the
GSA is presumed to be the exclusive GSA for its boundaries if
no other GSA submits a notice.
7.Provides for public involvement in the development of GSPs and
sets forth a diverse set of interests that should be
considered by the GSA during that process including an entity
within the basin that is currently a CASGEM monitoring entity.
8.Empowers GSAs to collect information regarding the condition
of the basin and then develop and implement a GSP using, as
the GSA chooses, powers and authorities provided under the Act
including, but not limited to:
A. Acquiring land and water to carry out the plan,
including but not limited to spreading, storing, retaining,
percolating, transporting, or reclaiming water to recharge
the basin or provide water supplies in-lieu of groundwater;
B. Monitoring for compliance and limiting extractions; and
C. Proposing, collecting, updating and enforcing fees,
consistent with all statutory and Constitutional
requirements.
1.Specifies that nothing in the Act or in any GSA adopted
pursuant to the Act determines or alters surface water rights
or groundwater rights under common law or any provision of law
that determines or grants surface water rights.
2.Requires, by June 1, 2016, that DWR develop regulations
regarding:
SB 1168
Page
6
A. GSP components;
B. Coordination of multiple GSPs for a basin; and
C. Alternative compliance, including submitting an existing
plan as a functional equivalent of a GSP or submitting an
analysis of basin conditions that demonstrates the basin is
being sustainably managed.
1.Specifies, in those areas that require a GSP to be completed,
adopted, and submitted to DWR that the deadlines are:
A. January 31, 2020, in high and medium priority basins
that are subject to critical conditions of overdraft; and
B. January 31, 2022 for all other high and medium priority
basins.
1.Exempts the preparation and adoption of a GSP from the
California Environmental Quality Act but does not exempt a
project or action to implement the GSP.
2.Requires GSPs to meet certain standards including:
A. Encompassing an entire basin or subbasin; and
B. Being designed to achieve sustainable groundwater
management within 20 years of adoption with progress
reports to DWR and the State Water Board every five years.
1.Requires a GSA to annually report to DWR its groundwater
elevation data, aggregated extraction data, use or
availability of surface water for recharge or in-lieu
supplies, total water use, and change in groundwater storage.
2.Allows DWR to adjust basin boundaries, as specified, and
re-prioritize low and very low basins according to criteria
that include adverse impacts to habitat and surface water
resources. Requires DWR to adopt emergency regulations
governing basin boundary adjustments.
3.Provides that if a basin is reprioritized to medium or high,
it shall have two years from the date of reprioritization to
form a governance entity for sustainable management or submit
SB 1168
Page
7
an alternate means of establishing the basin is sustainably
managed. If no alternate means is approved, allows five years
to adopt a GSP in compliance with the Act.
4.Prohibits the adoption or renewal of existing groundwater
management plans that do not meet the requirements for a GSP
but allows such plans to remain in effect until a GSP is
adopted.
5.Allows a GSA to become a CASGEM monitoring agency.
6.Contains chaptering language that only allows this bill to
become operative if AB 1739 (Dickinson) and SB 1319 (Pavley)
are enacted and become operative this session.
Background
As Benjamin Franklin warned over 200 years ago, we know the
worth of water when the well is dry. Unfortunately, for many
Californians that is a stark reality or a pending calamity that
has been coming in slow-motion for 50 years. In its August 15,
2014, editorial the Sacramento Bee notes that it was in 1962
that an Assembly Interim Committee on Water dodged the issue of
needed groundwater management by advising the Legislature it
should act if the situation got worse. It got worse. Sixteen
years later, in 1978, the Governor's Commission to Review
California Water Rights Law, a group commissioned by Governor
Jerry Brown, found the groundwater situation was critical and
that comprehensive local management had not been undertaken in
many over drafted areas of the state. Again, there was no
action.
An August 18, 2014, Los Angeles Times column asserts there is no
better time to act than now. The Times notes that the
recently-passed $7.545 bond for water-related projects and
programs that is scheduled for the November 2014 ballot contains
$100 million for planning and implementing groundwater
management, $800 million for cleaning up groundwater, $700
million for recycling and $2.7 billion for dam building. As the
Los Angeles Times column states, these are projects that can
help replenish underground basins but it will take pumping rules
to assure taxpayers that they are getting their money's worth.
The Times Los Angeles column concludes, the State has been
ignoring experts' increasing warnings regarding groundwater
SB 1168
Page
8
depletions for decades and holding off on groundwater regulation
since statehood but together this bill and a related measure AB
1739, seek to empower local governments to manage groundwater
sustainably while allowing the state to step in if they fail to
do so.
While California uses more groundwater than any other state, it
is the last in the Union to lack an enforceable set of statewide
groundwater management standards. Groundwater informational
hearings in the Assembly Water, Parks & Wildlife Committee and
the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee in March 2014
revealed disturbing statistics on the current degradation of
some of California's groundwater basins: between 2003 and 2009
the groundwater aquifers for the Central Valley and its major
mountain water source, the Sierra Nevada, lost almost 26 million
acre-feet of water - nearly enough water combined to fill Lake
Mead, America's largest reservoir. The findings reflected the
effects of California's extended drought and the resulting
increased rates of groundwater being pumped for human uses, such
as irrigation.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
Increased annual General Fund costs to DWR of approximately $4
million beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2019-20 to collect and
manage data, complete evaluations, and assist the State Water
Board in developing interim plans. DWR received $22.5 million
in the 2014-15 Budget ($2.5 million for FY 2014-15 and $5
million each year from FY 2015-16 through FY 2018-19 which
will fund Bulletin 118 updates and technical assistance.
Minor, if any, reimbursable local government costs.
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/29/14)
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,
Zone 7
American Planning Association
Association of California Water Agencies
Audubon California
SB 1168
Page
9
Barona Band of Mission Indians
Bay Area Council
California Climate and Agricultural Network
California Coastkeeper Alliance
California Council of Geoscience Organizations
California Environmental Justice Alliance
California Environmental Rights Foundation
California Groundwater Coalition
California League of Conservation Voters
California ReLeaf
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
California State Pipe Trades Council
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
California Tribal Business Alliance
California Trout
California Urban Streams Partnership
California Water Foundation
California Waterfowl Association
City of Anaheim
City of Los Angeles, Mayor's Office
Clean Water Action
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation
Community Alliance with Family Farmers
Community Water Center
Comte Civico Del Valle, Inc.
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Earthworks
East Bay Municipal Utility District
East Orange County Water District
EMAX Laboratories, Inc.
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
Environmental Navigation Services, Inc.
Groundwater Resources Association of California
Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake
Heal the Bay
Horizon Environmental Inc.
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Inyo County
Irvine Ranch Water District
Karuk Tribe
Klamath Forest Alliance
Klamath Riverkeeper
Leadership Council for Justice & Accountability
SB 1168
Page
10
Local Government Commission
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles City Council
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers
Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster
Montclair Environmental Management, Inc.
Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center
Natural Resources Defense Council
Orange County Water District
Pacific Forest Trust
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Parker Groundwater
Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians
Planning & Conservation League
PolicyLink
PRO Water Equity
Pueblo Unido CDC
Quinn Environmental Strategies, Inc.
Raymond Basin Management Board
Rincon Band of Luise�o Indians
Russian Riverkeeper
Sacred Places Institute for Indigenous Peoples
San Diego County Water Authority
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
San Gabriel Valley Water Association
San Jerardo Cooperative, Inc.
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Sierra Club California
Sonoma County Water Agency
Sullivan International Group, Inc.
Sustainable Watershed Management
The Nature Conservancy
The Source Group, Inc.
The Trust for Public Land
The Wildlands Conservancy
Todd Groundwater
Trout Unlimited
Union of Concerned Scientists
United States Department of Defense, Regional Environmental
Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
Valley Industry and Commerce Association
Valley-Warner Center Chamber of Commerce
Ventura County
SB 1168
Page
11
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians
Water Replenishment District of Southern California
West Basin Municipal Water District
Western Municipal Water District
WiLDCOAST
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/29/14)
African American Farmers of California
Agricultural Council of California
Allied Grape Growers
Almond Hullers & Processors Association
Association of California Egg Farmers
Blue Diamond Growers
CALAMCO
California Agricultural Aircraft Association
California Ammonia Co.
California Association of Nurseries & Garden Centers
California Bean Shippers Association
California Blueberry Association
California Canning Peach Association
California Cattlemen's Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Citrus Mutual
California Construction and Industrial Materials Association
California Cotton Ginners Association
California Cotton Growers Association
California Dairies, Inc.
California Farm Bureau Federation
California Fresh Fruit Association
California Grain & Feed
California Groundwater Association
California League of Food Processors
California Pear Growers Association
California Seed Association
California State Floral Association
California Tomato Growers Association
California Warehouse Association
California Women for Agriculture
Campos Brothers Farms
Coachella Valley Water District
Dairy Farmers of America-Western Area
Del Monte Foods
SB 1168
Page
12
Desert Water Agency (unless amended)
Family Business Association
Fruit Growers Supply Company
Grower-Shipper Association of Central California
Grower-Shipper Association of Santa Barbara & San Luis Obispo
Counties
Kaweah Basin
Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District
Kern County
Kern County Water Agency
Kings River Conservation District
Kings River Water Association
Land O' Lakes
Nisei Farmers League
Northern California Water Association
Pacific Coast Producers
Raisin Bargaining Association
San Joaquin County
San Joaquin River Exchange Contactors
Stockton East Water District
Sun-Maid Growers of California
Sunsweet Growers Inc.
Tulare Irrigation District
Valley Ag Water Coalition
Western Agricultural Processors Association
Western Growers Association
Western Plant Health Association
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The author states that this bill is
needed because California faces a groundwater crisis. The
author points out that the cumulative overdraft of our
groundwater basins is equivalent to the entire amount of water
stored in Lake Tahoe and that in many areas of the state, local
groundwater managers lack the tools and authorities to manage
the groundwater basins. The author concludes that without
improved local management the overdraft in many parts of the
state will get even worse over the next several years. Other
supporters add that a new statewide policy for sustainable
groundwater management is urgently needed and that this bill
addresses one of California's most pressing water management
issues. Supporters point out that breadth of the stakeholder
involvement process that was used in order to help ensure the
right balance of provisions to empower local groundwater
management agencies with new tools and authorities and to create
SB 1168
Page
13
an appropriate state backstop that will allow the state to
intervene only when needed.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Opponents state they share the
author's interest in improving groundwater management but are
concerned about the broad scope and specific impacts of this
measure. Opponents believe this bill is extraordinarily
ambitious and comprehensive and that in its current form it
would substantially alter the California landscape and economy
for generations to come. Opponents are concerned that this bill
could require hundreds of millions of dollars in implementation
costs and are worried about potential affects to existing
groundwater rights and generate litigation. Opponents maintain
the legislation goes beyond the goal of sustainable groundwater
management and will adversely affect the agricultural economy
and the landscape that is dependent upon it and cause a
potential devaluation in some land thus affecting property tax
collections in some areas and the services and programs that are
dependent upon them. Opponents advocate delaying action in
order to avoid what they believe would be unanticipated
consequences.
RM:e 8/29/14 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****