BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1203|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1203
          Author:   Jackson (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/21/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 4/24/14
          AYES:  Wolk, Beall, DeSaulnier, Hernandez, Liu
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Knight, Walters

           SENATE FLOOR  :  33-0, 5/28/14
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Block, Cannella, Corbett, De Le�n,  
            DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hancock,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Knight, Leno, Lieu,  
            Liu, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nielsen, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Roth, Steinberg, Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Berryhill, Calderon, Correa, Lara, Torres,  
            Wright, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 8/25/14 - See last page for vote


            SUBJECT  :    Property taxation:  welfare exemption:  rental  
                      housing and related facilities:  payment in lieu of  
                      taxes agreement

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that, notwithstanding any other  
          law, on or after January 1, 2015, a local government shall not  
          enter into a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreement with a  
          property owner of a low-income housing project.
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1203
                                                                     Page  
          2

           
           Assembly Amendments  remove the language that delete the  
          certification requirement for welfare exemption eligibility and  
          insert language that will, on or after January 1, 2015, prohibit  
          a local government from entering into a PILOT agreement, as  
          specified; make this bill's enactment contingent upon the  
          enactment of AB 1760 (Chau); and make other conforming changes.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law: 

          1.Authorizes the Legislature to exempt from taxation property  
            used exclusively for religious, hospital, or charitable  
            purposes, as specified.  (California Constitution Article  
            XIII, Section 4(b).)  The Legislature has implemented this  
            "welfare exemption" in Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC)  
            Section 214. 

          2.Exempts low-income housing developments operated by non-profit  
            organizations, as specified. 

          3.Imposes a "certification requirement" on low-income housing  
            owners seeking the welfare exemption.  Specifically, the law  
            requires a project's owner to "[c]ertify that the funds that  
            would have been necessary to pay property taxes are used to  
            maintain the affordability of, or reduce rents otherwise  
            necessary for, the units occupied by lower income households."

          This bill: 

          1.Provides that any PILOT agreement entered into in violation of  
            this prohibition shall be void and unenforceable. 

          2.Provides that, notwithstanding any other law, any outstanding  
            ad valorem tax, interest, or penalty that was levied between  
            January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2015, as a result of a PILOT  
            agreement shall be cancelled, and any tax, interest, or  
            penalty, as so levied, that was paid prior to January 1, 2015,  
            shall be refunded. 

          3.Provides that, on or after January 1, 2015, an escape or  
            supplemental assessment shall not be levied on the basis that  
            payments made under a PILOT agreement were, or are being, used  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1203
                                                                     Page  
          3

            in a manner incompatible with the certification requirement  
            contained in R&TC Section 214(g)(2)(B). 

          4.Amends R&TC Section 214 (governing the welfare exemption) in  
            numerous respects, by: 

             A.   Providing that, for purposes of the low-income housing  
               exemption, owners shall be entitled to a partial exemption  
               equal to that percentage of the property's value that is  
               equal to the percentage that the number of units serving  
               lower income households represents of the total number of  
               residential units; 

             B.   Defining the term "related facilities" as any manager's  
               units and any and all common area spaces that are included  
               within the physical boundaries of the rental housing  
               development, including, but not limited to, common area  
               space, walkways, balconies, patios, clubhouse space,  
               meeting rooms, laundry facilities and parking areas, except  
               any portions of the overall development that are nonexempt  
               commercial space; and 

             C.   Defining the term "units serving lower income  
               households" as units that are occupied by lower income  
               households at an affordable rent, as defined in Health and  
               Safety Code (HSC) Section 50053 or, to the extent that the  
               terms of federal, state, or local financing or financial  
               assistance conflicts with HSC Section 50053, rents that do  
               not exceed those prescribed by the terms of the financing  
               or financial assistance.  Units reserved for lower income  
               households at an affordable rent that are temporarily  
               vacant due to tenant turnover or repairs shall be counted  
               as occupied. 

          5.Provides that this bill is contingent upon the enactment of AB  
            1760 (Chau).

           Comments
           
          According to the author, "As a condition of project approval,  
          some local governments have required affordable housing  
          developers to agree to annual PILOT payments, often equal to the  
          share of the jurisdiction's share of the property tax.  Most  
          recently, some county assessors are threatening certain  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1203
                                                                     Page  
          4

          affordable housing projects that make PILOT payments with the  
          cancellation of their welfare exemption and the imposition of  
          back taxes for past years when PILOT payments were made.  Back  
          taxes on PILOT agreements are often in the hundreds of thousands  
          of dollars.  These assessments threaten to bankrupt the  
          affordable housing developments, which would result in the loss  
          of precious affordable housing.  Affordable housing developments  
          provide critical opportunities for our low-income residents.  
          Often, these units can be their last resort before becoming  
          homeless.  As confirmed by Legislative Counsel in 2012, there is  
          no legal authority to charge these PILOT fees.  Affordable  
          housing developments should be protected by the welfare  
          exemption, not burdened by local governments requiring PILOT  
          fees."

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   Local:  
           No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/25/14)

          Board of Equalization, 4th District
          BRIDGE Housing Corporation
          Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
          California Housing Consortium
          California Infill Builders Federation
          City of Sacramento
          Housing Authority of County of Butte
          Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura
          LeadingAge California
          Pacific Housing Inc.
          Partners in Housing
          The Arc of Ventura County
          Ventura County Assessor
          Western Center on Law and Poverty

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/25/14)

          City of San Marcos


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  75-0, 8/25/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dababneh,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1203
                                                                     Page  
          5

            Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier,  
            Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Grove,  
            Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein,  
            Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande,  
            Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. P�rez, V. Manuel P�rez,  
            Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas,  
            Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk,  
            Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bonilla, Beth Gaines, Mansoor, Waldron,  
            Vacancy

          AB:k  8/26/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****




























                                                                CONTINUED