SB 1228, as amended, Hueso. Trade Corridors Improvement Fund.
Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1B at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, provides for transfer of $2 billion of bond proceeds to the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund, created by the bond act, for infrastructure improvements along federally designated Trade Corridors of National Significance, to be allocated by the California Transportation Commission to eligible projects, as specified.
This bill would continue the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund in existence for the purpose of receipt and expenditure of revenues from sources other than the bond act. The bill would provide for allocation of these revenues, upon appropriation, by the California Transportation Commission for largely similar purposes as the bond act funds,
but would specifically reference, as eligible projects, infrastructure improvements that benefit the state’s land ports of entry, seaports, and airports. The bill would require the commission to consult specified plans and a specified strategy in determining the projects eligible forbegin delete funding.end deletebegin insert funding and to allocate moneys from the fund consistent with a provision of the bond act and specified fund guidelines adopted by the commission.end insert
The bill, to the extentbegin delete fundsend deletebegin insert moneysend insert are transferred to the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, would require projects
funded with thosebegin delete fundsend deletebegin insert moneysend insert to bebegin delete consistent with the purposes of the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund and the guidelines adopted for the fund by the commission and to demonstrate how they will reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the goals and objectives ofend deletebegin insert subject to all of the requirements of existing law applicable to the expenditure of moneys appropriated fromend insert the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fundbegin insert, including, among other things, furthering the regulatory purposes of the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006end insert.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares that
2international trade in California is an increasingly important
3component of the state’s $2 trillion economy. In 2013, California
4exported $168 billion in products, an increase of more than 4
5percent over the amount exported in 2012. California has five
6major land ports of entry, yielding $535.9 billion in economic
7activity in 2012. California is also home to 11 seaports on over
81,000 miles of coastline. Seaports generate billions of dollars in
9economic activity and millions of jobs. Land ports of entry and
10seaports create busy borders and harbors with heavy industrial
11
commerce. It is imperative that safety issues and pollution
12generated by trade are mitigated in order to reduce those impacts
13and to allow additional growth in international trade.
Chapter 4.8 (commencing with Section 2192) is added
15to Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, to read:
16
(a) The Trade Corridors Improvement Fund, created
20pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 8879.23 of the Government
21Code, is hereby continued in existence to receive revenues from
P3 1sources other than the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air
2Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. This chapter shall
3govern expenditure of those other revenues.
4(b) The moneys in the fund from those other sources shall be
5available upon appropriation for allocation by the California
6Transportation Commission for infrastructure improvements in
7this state on federally designated Trade Corridors of National and
8Regional Significance, on the Primary Freight Network, and along
9other
corridors that have a high volume of freight movement, as
10determined by the commission. In determining the projects eligible
11for funding, the commission shall consult the state Transportation
12Agency’s state freight plan as described in Section 13978.8 of the
13Government Code, thebegin insert Stateend insert Air Resources Board’s Sustainable
14Freight Strategy adopted by Resolution 14-2, and the trade
15infrastructure and goods movement plan submitted to the
16commission by the Secretary ofbegin delete the United States Department ofend delete
17 Transportation and the Secretary ofbegin delete the United Statesend delete
18 Environmental Protection
Agency. The commission shall also
19consult trade infrastructure and goods movement plans adopted
20by regional transportation planning agencies, adopted regional
21transportation plans required by state and federal law, and the
22statewide port master plan prepared by the California Marine and
23Intermodal Transportation System Advisory Council
24(Cal-MITSAC) pursuant to Section 1730 of the Harbors and
25Navigation Code, when determining eligible projects for funding.
26Eligible projects for these funds include, but are not limited to, all
27of the following:
28(1) Highway capacity improvements and operational
29improvements to more efficiently accommodate the movement of
30freight, particularly for ingress and egress to and from the state’s
31land ports of entry and seaports, including navigable inland
32waterways used to transport freight between
seaports, land ports
33of entry, and airports, and to relieve traffic congestion along major
34trade or goods movement corridors.
35(2) Freight rail system improvements to enhance the ability to
36move goods from seaports, land ports of entry, and
airports to
37warehousing and distribution centers throughout California,
38including projects that separate rail lines from highway or local
39road traffic, improve freight rail mobility through mountainous
P4 1regions, relocate rail switching yards, and other projects that
2improve the efficiency and capacity of the rail freight system.
3(3) Projects to enhance the capacity and efficiency of ports.
4(4) Truck corridor improvements, including dedicated truck
5facilities or truck toll facilities.
6(5) Border access improvements that enhance goods movement
7between California and Mexico and that maximize the state’s
8ability to access coordinated border infrastructure funds made
9available to the state by federal
law.
10(6) Surface transportation and connector road improvements to
11effectively facilitate the movement of goods, particularly for
12ingress and egress to and from the state’s land ports of entry,
13airports, and seaports, to relieve traffic congestion along major
14trade or goods movement corridors.
15(c) (1) The commission shall allocate funds for trade
16infrastructure improvements from the fund consistent with Section
178879.52 of the Government Code and the Trade Corridors
18Improvement Fund (TCIF) Guidelines adopted by the commission
19on November 27, 2007, or as amended by the commission, and in
20a manner that (A) addresses the state’s most urgent needs, (B)
21balances the demands of various land ports of entry, seaports, and
22airports, (C) provides reasonable
geographic balance between the
23state’s regions, and (D) places emphasis on projects that improve
24trade corridor mobility while reducing emissions of diesel
25particulate and other pollutant emissions.
26(2) In addition, the commission shall also consider the following
27factors when allocating these funds:
28(A) “Velocity,” which means the speed by which large cargo
29would travel from the land port of entry or seaport through the
30distribution system.
31(B) “Throughput,” which means the volume of cargo that would
32move from the land port of entry or seaport through the distribution
33system.
34(C) “Reliability,” which means a reasonably consistent and
35predictable
amount of time for cargo to travel from one point to
36another on any given day or at any given time in California.
37(D) “Congestion reduction,” which means the reduction in
38recurrent daily hours of delay to be achieved.
39(d)
end delete
begin insert(a)end insert To the extent moneys from the Greenhouse Gas
2Reduction Fund, attributable to the auction or sale of allowances
3as part of a market-based compliance mechanism relative to
4reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, are transferred to the Trade
5Corridors Improvement fund, projects funded with those moneys
6shallbegin delete demonstrate how they will reduce emissions consistent with
7the goals and objectives of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.end delete
8begin insert
be subject to all of the requirements of existing law applicable to
9the expenditure of moneys appropriated from the Greenhouse Gas
10Reduction Fund, including, but not limited to, both of the following:end insert
11(1) Projects shall further the regulatory purposes of the
12California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5
13(commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code),
14including reducing emissions from greenhouse gases in the state,
15directing public and private investment toward disadvantaged
16communities, increasing the diversity of energy sources, or creating
17opportunities for businesses, public agencies, nonprofits, and other
18community institutions to participate in and benefit from statewide
19efforts to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
20(2) Projects shall be consistent with the guidance developed by
21the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 39715 of the
22Health and Safety Code.
23(b) All allocations of funds made by the commission pursuant
24to this section shall be made in a manner consistent with the
25criteria expressed in Section 39712 of the Health and Safety Code
26and with the investment plan developed by the Department of
27Finance pursuant to Section 39716 of the Health and Safety Code.
28(e)
end deleteThe commission shall allocate funds made available
30by thisbegin delete sectionend deletebegin insert chapterend insert to projects that have identified and
31committed supplemental funding from appropriate local, federal,
32or private sources. The commission shall determine the appropriate
33amount of supplemental funding each project should have to be
34eligible for moneys from the fund based on a project-by-project
35review and an assessment of the project’s benefit to the state and
36the program. Except for border access
improvements described in
37paragraph (5) of subdivisionbegin delete (b),end deletebegin insert (b) of Section 2192,end insert improvements
38funded with moneys from the fund shall have supplemental funding
39that is at least equal to the amount of the contribution from the
P6 1fund. The commission may give priority for funding to projects
2with higher levels of committed supplemental funding.
3(f)
end deleteThe commission shall include in its annual report to
5the Legislature, required by Section 14535 of the Government
6Code, a summary of its activities related to the administration of
7thisbegin delete section.end deletebegin insert chapter.end insert The summary shall, at a minimum, include
8a description and the location of the projects contained in the
9program funded by the fund, the amount of funds allocated to each
10project, the status of each project, and a description of the mobility
11and air quality improvements
the program is achieving.
O
96