BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT BILL NO: SB 1240
Norma Torres, Chair HEARING DATE: April 21, 2014
SB 1240 (Anderson) as introduced 2/20/14FISCAL: YES
STATE CIVIL SERVICE: EMPLOYEMENT FORMS
HISTORY :
Sponsor: Author
SUMMARY :
SB 1240 would require state employment application forms to
require an applicant to disclose whether the applicant had
ever entered upon an agreement with a state department
prohibiting the applicant from seeking or accepting
subsequent employment with the state.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS :
1)Existing law :
a) provides, pursuant to Section 1 of Article VII of the
State Constitution, that the civil service includes
every officer and employee of the State except as
otherwise provided and that in the civil service,
permanent appointment and promotion shall be made under
a general system based on merit ascertained by
competitive examination.
b) requires, pursuant to the Civil Service Act ("the
Act"), that state employment shall be based on the merit
principle; that appointments are based upon merit and
fitness ascertained through practical and competitive
examination; and that tenure of civil service employment
is subject to good behavior.
c) requires the California Department of Human Resources
(CalHR) and the Department of Fair Employment and
Housing (DFEH) to work cooperatively to develop uniform
employment forms where possible pursuant to the
provisions of the Act and coordinate their enforcement
of the Act.
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 7, 2014 Page
1
d) requires that each state agency shall use the
standard employment forms.
2)This bill :
a) provides that the standard employment form shall
include a required disclosure by the applicant to
disclose whether the applicant has ever entered into an
agreement with a state agency or department, presumably
as part of a termination agreement, not to seek or
accept subsequent employment with the state.
COMMENTS :
1)Arguments in Support :
According to the author, the California State Auditor issued
a March 2013 report on the construction of the new Bay
Bridge, including disciplinary actions against Caltrans
employees for improprieties on the bridge project identified
in the report. The report noted that a certain Caltrans
employee with a history of disciplinary issues had appealed
his dismissal relating to the bridge project improprieties.
Subsequently, the employee entered into a settlement
agreement with Caltrans to leave state service and not seek
or accept another position with the state. Because there is
no mechanism to track such negotiated separation agreements,
the Auditor identified a significant risk that the employee
could be hired by another state agency despite his past
dishonesty and neglect of duty.
According to the Author's office, "Under current practices,
there is no efficient way of identifying individuals applying
for employment in a state agency as someone who was
previously employed by another state agency and has entered
an agreement that prohibits them from seeking or accepting
further employment with the state."
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 7, 2014 Page
2
2)OPPOSITION :
None on file.
#####
Glenn A. Miles
Date: April 7, 2014 Page
3