BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1292|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINSES
Bill No: SB 1292
Author: Hueso (D), et al.
Amended: 8/18/14
Vote: 21
SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE : 4-2, 4/30/14
AYES: Gaines, Fuller, Hancock, Leno
NOES: Hill, Jackson
NO VOTE RECORDED: Pavley
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 7-0, 5/23/14
AYES: De Le�n, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
SENATE FLOOR : 32-2, 5/28/14
AYES: Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Corbett,
Correa, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani,
Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Mitchell,
Monning, Morrell, Nielsen, Padilla, Roth, Steinberg, Vidak,
Walters, Wolk, Wyland
NOES: Jackson, Pavley
NO VOTE RECORDED: Calderon, Hancock, Knight, Torres, Wright,
Yee
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 8/27/14 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill increases, from $3 million to $5 million,
CONTINUED
SB 1292
Page
2
the maximum amount of a construction grant award authorized
under the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SDWSRF) to
each participating public water system serving a severely
disadvantaged community for the system's share of the cost of a
construction project.
Assembly Amendments add coauthors and make clarifying and
technical changes.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
1.Requires the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to
administer the SDWSRF.
2.Provides specified maximum amounts for grant and loan funding
from the SDWSRF and authorizes up to 100% grant funding for
eligible costs to a small water system that serves severely
disadvantaged communities.
3.Sets the maximum grant to each participating public water
system for its share of the costs of the construction at $3
million.
This bill increases, from $3 million to $5 million, the maximum
amount of a construction grant award authorized under the SDWSRF
to each participating public water system serving a severely
disadvantaged community for the system's share of the cost of a
construction project. The water system remains eligible to
receive up to $10 million in a grant if it meets existing
criteria.
Background
SDWSRF . Congress established the federal Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund (DWSRF) as part of the 1996 Safe Drinking Water
Act Amendments to better enable public water systems to comply
with national primary drinking water standards and to protect
public health. The DWSRF provides financial assistance in the
form of capitalization grants to states to provide low-interest
loans and other assistance to public water systems. In order to
receive these funds, states must provide a state match equal to
20% of the federal capitalization grants and must create a DWSRF
CONTINUED
SB 1292
Page
3
program for public water system infrastructure needs and other
drinking water related activities. In response, California
established the SDWSRF through SB 1307 (Costa, Chapter 734,
Statutes of 1997) to help fund the state's drinking water needs.
The SDWSRF provides public water systems the opportunity to use
subsidized funding to correct infrastructure problems, assess
and protect source water, and improve technical, managerial, and
financial capability.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)
allocates federal DWSRF funds to the states according to a
formula that reflects their proportional share of needs
identified in the most recent Drinking Water Infrastructure
Needs Survey. California annually receives approximately $86
million in the DWSRF capitalization grant money while the state
matches with approximately $17 million.
Stretching the SDWSRF . The US EPA has estimated that California
will need more than $40 billion dollars in drinking water
infrastructure improvements over the next 20 years. There are
many severely disadvantaged communities across California that
are in need of state assistance.
Raising the cap for grants will provide greater assistance for
some of these communities, but that does not mean that there
will be more money available. It just means the limited funds
in the SDWSRF will be concentrated in fewer communities. By
taking a larger piece of this limited funding for some
communities, this may very well mean that some communities in
need that would have otherwise received state assistance would
now receive none.
Additionally, existing law already allows for higher grant
awards if the DPH makes specified findings of need. This
provision of existing law ensures that the higher awards are
made to those communities with the greatest need while still
providing assistance to other communities.
Changes to the Drinking Water Program (Program) . Over the last
five years, the Senate Environmental Quality Committee has
considered numerous bills making changes to the administration
of the Program.
In 2013, the Senate Environmental Quality Committee heard AB 145
CONTINUED
SB 1292
Page
4
(Perea) that would have transferred, during the 2014-15 fiscal
year, the duties and responsibilities related to the regulation
and oversight of drinking water, including the authority to
administer SDWSRF from DPH to the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB). In that hearing, the Committee heard testimony
over DPH's non-compliance with federal regulation of the
administration of SDWSRF. The Committee contemplated various
solutions and ultimately concluded that a comprehensive change
to the SDWSRF was necessary to effectively fix this funding
program. The Committee passed AB 145, however the bill was held
in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
In January 2014, Governor Brown proposed to transfer the Program
from the DPH to the SWRCB on July 1, 2014, as part of the state
Budget. Both the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees have
considered this proposal and the item has been left open as part
of the final budget discussion.
If this Program is going to be transferred to a new
administering agency in July, it would be prudent for the
Legislature to hold off on any additional changes to the Program
and the allocation of funds from this Program until that
transfer has been completed. Once the transfer has been
completed, the SWRCB will combine the administration of SDWSRF
with the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and would likely make
or recommend comprehensive changes that would help California's
most disadvantaged communities.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown
increased cost pressures, potentially in the millions of dollars
on the SDWSRF (special fund) for grant assistance.
In fiscal year 2013-14, 61% of grant recipients served a
severely disadvantaged community. The total amount of grants
issued is capped in statute at 30% with the remaining 70% issued
as loans. This bill does not increase the 30% grant cap.
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/27/14)
California Municipal Utilities Association
California Special Districts Association
CONTINUED
SB 1292
Page
5
California Water Association
Central California Environmental Justice Network
Cl�nicas de Salud del Pueblo
Coalition for a Safe Environment
Comite C�vico del Valle
Greenaction
Heber Public Utility District
Our Roots Multicultural Center
Rural County Representatives of California
The Family Treehouse
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The California Municipal Utilities
Association (CMUA) states that this bill "will make it easier
for severely disadvantaged communities to fund clean drinking
water projects. Specifically, the measure would increase the
maximum amount awarded from $3 million to $5 million for the
construction of a single project from the [SDWSRF] for water
systems serving severely disadvantaged communities. There are
many water quality and infrastructure problems plaguing
disadvantaged rural and urban communities. CMUA supports
expediting funding for these projects through grant monies and
loans, when appropriate."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 8/27/14
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,
Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian
Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,
Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,
Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,
Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden,
Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,
Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi,
Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A.
P�rez, V. Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,
Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner,
Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Harkey, Vacancy
RM:k 8/27/14 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
CONTINUED
SB 1292
Page
6
**** END ****
CONTINUED