BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 1300 (Hancock) - Refineries: Turnarounds
          
          Amended: April 21, 2014         Policy Vote: L&IR 3-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: May 5, 2014       Consultant: Robert Ingenito
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: SB 1300 would require petroleum refineries to  
          report annually their schedule for turnarounds, as defined, to  
          the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), and to provide DIR  
          with information regarding safety and infrastructure. In  
          addition, the bill would require DIR to recoup the full costs of  
          extraordinary expenditures from an emergency situation at a  
          petroleum refinery.
           
          Fiscal Impact: DIR estimates that it would incur annual costs of  
          roughly $250,000 (special funds) to implement the provisions of  
          this bill, to fund three positions required to evaluate the  
          technical information provided by refineries. 

          Background: The California Energy Commission reports that the  
          State has a total of 20 refineries which are located in the San  
          Francisco Bay Area, the Los Angeles Area and the Central Valley.  
          About two million barrels (a barrel is equal to 42 U.S. gallons)  
          of petroleum are processed daily into a variety of products,  
          with gasoline representing about half of the total product  
          volume.

          The American Petroleum Institute (API) indicates that refinery  
          turnarounds are planned shutdowns of the refinery process, and  
          can be total or partial in nature. During the shutdown period,  
          refinery staff performs maintenance, overhaul and repair  
          operations and inspect, test and replace process materials and  
          equipment. API indicates that turnarounds are generally  
          scheduled at least one year in advance and allow for necessary  
          maintenance and upkeep of operating units to ensure safe and  
          efficient operations. Depending on factors such as the amount of  
          required maintenance, the length of a turnaround can vary from  
          one week to over a month. 









          SB 1300 (Hancock)
          Page 1


          API also notes an inverse correlation between refinery safety  
          and the frequency with refineries start and stop their  
          operations, as refinery incidents are more likely to occur  
          during turnarounds.

          Proposed Law: With respect to turnarounds, this bill would,  
          among other things, do the following:
                 Define "turnaround" as a planned, periodic shutdown,  
               total or partial, of a refinery process unit or plant to  
               perform maintenance, overhaul, and repair operations and to  
               inspect, test, and replace process materials and equipment.  

                 Specify that "turnaround" does not include unplanned  
               shutdowns that occur due to emergencies or other unexpected  
               maintenance matters in a process unit or plant, or routine  
               maintenance, as specified. 

                 Require a refinery to submit to DIR a full schedule of  
               planned "turnarounds" for the various units on September 15  
               of each year. 

                 Upon request by DIR, require a refinery to provide  
               on-site access and specified documentation relating to a  
               planned turnaround at least 60 days in advance.

                 Require the refinery to submit notification of any  
               changes and supporting documents at least 30 days prior to  
               a planned turnaround. 

                 Require DIR to develop an electronic information  
               management system to facilitate monitoring of petroleum  
               refineries.

          With respect to fee authority, the bill would, among other  
          things, do the following:

                 Authorize DIR (instead of one of its divisions) to fix  
               and collect reasonable fees to cover all necessary  
               expenses, including administrative and indirect costs, for  
               the existing consultation, inspection, adoption of  
               standards and other duties required under current law. 

                 Authorize the fees to be used to fund participation in  
               interagency efforts to improve safety in refineries and  








          SB 1300 (Hancock)
          Page 2


               chemical plants. 

                 Require DIR to adopt rules and regulations governing the  
               criteria and procedures to fix and collect the fees,  
               including emergency regulations as necessary. 

                 Require DIR to recoup from the owner of a refinery (by  
               adding the amount expended to next year's assessment), the  
               full costs of extraordinary expenditures resulting from the  
               division's response to a hazardous material release or  
               similar occurrence. 

          Related Legislation: SB 438 (Hancock) of 2013 is very similar to  
          the provisions found in this bill. The bill was held in the  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee.

          Staff Comments: Currently there is no requirement for oil  
          refineries to report their schedule of turnarounds, and other  
          related information, to DIR. The receipt of this information  
          could assist the department to identify possible hazards and  
          schedule targeted inspections.

          Although flagged as a mandate by the Legislative Counsel because  
          it alters the definition of a crime or infraction, under Section  
          6(b) of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, any costs  
          to a unit of local government which result from legislation  
          defining a new crime or changing the definition of a crime are  
          not reimbursable by the State.