SB 1319, as amended, Pavley. Oil spills: oil spill prevention and response.
The Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Actbegin delete generally requires the administrator for oil spill response, acting at the direction of the Governor, to implement activities relating to oil spill response, including emergency drills and preparedness, and oil spill containment and cleanup, and to represent the state in any coordinated response efforts with the federal government. Existing law directs the governor to require the administrator to amend, not in conflict with the National Contingency Plan, the California oil spill contingency plan to add a marine oil spill contingency planning section containing specified elements, including, among others, an environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas element.end deletebegin insert
prohibits a person from operating a marine facility unless the owner or operator of the marine facility has obtained a certificate of financial responsibility. To receive a certificate of financial responsibility from the administrator for oil spill response, the act requires the owner or operator of a marine facility to make a specified showing of financial resources to the satisfaction of the administrator. The act authorizes the administrator to issue a certificate of financial responsibility on a lesser showing of financial resources for a period of not longer than 3 years if the administrator makes specified findings. The act establishes the Oil Spill Technical Advisory Committee and requires the committee to provide recommendations to the administrator and other specified state entities regarding the implementation of the act.end insert
This bill wouldbegin delete add an additional element that considers the variability in physical and chemical properties of oil transported within and to the state and its waters to the marine oil spill contingency planning section of the California oil spill contingency plan.end deletebegin insert
reduce the time period for which the administrator is authorized to issue a certificate of financial responsibility based on the lesser showing to a maximum of 2 years. The bill would require the committee to monitor and evaluate the modes of transportation of oil into and within the state and the properties of the oil to identify necessary changes in oil spill response and preparedness programs.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertThe Legislature finds and declares both of the
2following:end insert
3(a) Shifts in how oil is transported to and within the state change
4the accompanying risks and potential locations of oil spills.
5(b) Properties of crude oil transported to and within the state
6prior to refining
may change over time and alter the risks posed
7by an oil spill to human and environmental health and safety and
8in responding to an oil spill.
begin insertSection 8670.37.53 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is
10amended to read:end insert
(a) To receive a certificate of financial
12responsibility for a tank vessel or for all of the oil contained within
13begin delete such aend deletebegin insert the tankend insert vessel, the applicant shall demonstrate to the
14satisfaction of the administrator the financial ability to pay at least
15one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) for any damages that may
16arise during the term of the certificate.
17(b) The administrator may establish a lower standard of financial
18responsibility for small tank barges, vessels carrying oil as a
19secondary cargo, and small marine fueling
facilities. The standard
20shall be based on the quantity of oil that can be carried or stored
21and the risk of spill into marine waters. The administrator shall
P3 1not set a standard that is less than the expected costs from a
2reasonable worst case oil spill into marine waters.
3(c) (1) To receive a certificate of financial responsibility for a
4marine facility, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction
5of the administrator the financial ability to pay for any damages
6that might arise during a reasonable worst case oil spill into marine
7waters that results from the operations of the marine facility. The
8administrator shall consider criteria including, but not necessarily
9limited to, the amount of oil that could be spilled into marine waters
10from the facility, the cost of cleaning up spilled oil, the frequency
11of operations at the facility, and the damages that could result from
12a spill.
13(2) The administrator may issue a certificate for a marine facility
14upon a lesser showing of financial resources for a period of not
15longer thanbegin delete threeend deletebegin insert twoend insert years if the administrator finds all of the
16following:
17(A) The marine facility was operating on January 1, 1991.
18(B) Continued operation is necessary to finance abandonment
19of the marine facility.
20(C) The financial resources the operator is able to demonstrate
21are reasonably sufficient to cover the damages from foreseeable
22spills from the facility.
begin insertSection 8670.55 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
24to read:end insert
(a) begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertThe committee shall provide
26recommendations to the administrator, the State Lands
27Commission, the California Coastal Commission, and the San
28Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission on
29any provision of this chapter including the promulgation of all
30rules, regulations, guidelines, and policies.
31(2) Pursuant to paragraph (1), the committee shall monitor and
32evaluate the modes of transportation of oil into and within the
33state and the properties of the oil to identify any necessary changes
34in oil spill response and preparedness
programs to meet the goals
35of this chapter.
36(b) The committee may, at its own discretion, study, comment
37on, or evaluate, any aspect of oil spill prevention and response in
38the state. To the greatest extent possible, these studies shall be
39coordinated with studies being done by the federal government,
40the administrator, the State Lands Commission, the State Water
P4 1Resources Control Board, and other appropriate state and
2international entities. Duplication with the efforts of other entities
3shall be minimized.
4(c) The committee may attend any drills called pursuant to
5Sectionbegin delete 8601.10end deletebegin insert 8670.10end insert or any oil spills, if practicable.
6(d) The committee shall report biennially to the Governor and
7the Legislature on its evaluation of oil spill response and
8preparedness programs within the state and may prepare and send
9any additional reports it determines to be appropriate to the
10Governor and the Legislature.
11(e) On or before August 1, 2005, the committee shall review
12the Department of Finance report required under Section 8670.42
13and prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature
14comments on the report, including, but not limited to,
15recommendations for improving the state’s oil spill prevention,
16response, and preparedness program.
17(f) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2012.
end deleteSection 8574.7 of the Government Code is
19amended to read:
The Governor shall require the administrator, not in
21conflict with the National Contingency Plan, to amend the
22California oil spill contingency plan by adding a marine oil spill
23contingency planning section that provides for the best achievable
24protection of the coast and marine waters. “Administrator” for
25purposes of this section means the administrator appointed by the
26Governor pursuant to Section 8670.4. The marine oil spill
27contingency planning section shall consist of all of the following
28elements:
29(a) A state marine response element that specifies the hierarchy
30for state and local agency response to an oil spill. The element
31shall define the necessary tasks for oversight and control of cleanup
32and
removal activities associated with a marine oil spill and shall
33specify each agency’s particular responsibility in carrying out these
34tasks. The element shall also include an organizational chart of
35the state marine oil spill response organization and a definition of
36the resources, capabilities, and response assignments of each
37agency involved in cleanup and removal actions in a marine oil
38spill.
39(b) A regional and local planning element that shall provide the
40framework for the involvement of regional and local agencies in
P5 1the state effort to respond to a marine oil spill, and shall ensure
2the effective and efficient use of regional and local resources in
3all of the following:
4(1) Traffic and crowd control.
5(2) Firefighting.
6(3) Boating traffic control.
7(4) Radio and communications control and provision of access
8to equipment.
9(5) Identification and use of available local and regional
10equipment or other resources suitable for use in cleanup and
11removal actions.
12(6) Identification of private and volunteer resources or personnel
13with special or unique capabilities relating to marine oil spill
14cleanup and removal actions.
15(7) Provision of medical emergency services.
16(8) Consideration of the identification and use of private
working
17craft and mariners, including commercial fishing vessels and
18licensed commercial fishing men and women, in containment,
19cleanup, and removal actions.
20(c) A coastal protection element that establishes the state
21standards for coastline protection. The administrator, in
22consultation with the Coast Guard and Navy and the shipping
23industry, shall develop criteria for coastline protection. If
24appropriate, the administrator shall consult with representatives
25from the States of Alaska, Washington, and Oregon, the Province
26of British Columbia in Canada, and the Republic of Mexico. The
27criteria shall designate at least all of the following:
28(1) Appropriate shipping lanes and
navigational aids for tankers,
29barges, and other commercial vessels to reduce the likelihood of
30collisions between tankers, barges, and other commercial vessels.
31Designated shipping lanes shall be located off the coastline at a
32distance sufficient to significantly reduce the likelihood that
33disabled vessels will run aground along the coast of the state.
34(2) Ship position reporting and communications requirements.
35(3) Required predeployment of protective equipment for
36sensitive environmental areas along the coastline.
37(4) Required emergency response vessels that are capable of
38preventing disabled tankers from running aground.
P6 1(5) Required emergency response vessels
that are capable of
2commencing oil cleanup operations before spilled oil can reach
3the shoreline.
4(6) An expedited decisionmaking process for dispersant use in
5coastal waters. Prior to adoption of the process, the administrator
6shall ensure that a comprehensive testing program is carried out
7for any dispersant proposed for use in California marine waters.
8The testing program shall evaluate toxicity and effectiveness of
9the dispersants.
10(7) Required rehabilitation facilities for wildlife injured by
11spilled oil.
12(8) An assessment of how activities that usually require a permit
13from a state or local agency may be expedited or issued by the
14administrator in the event of an oil spill.
15(d) An environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas element
16that shall provide the framework for prioritizing and ensuring the
17protection of environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas.
18The environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas element shall
19be developed by the administrator, in conjunction with appropriate
20local agencies, and shall include all of the following:
21(1) Identification and prioritization of environmentally and
22ecologically sensitive areas in marine waters and along the coast.
23Identification and prioritization of environmentally and ecologically
24sensitive areas shall not prevent or excuse the use of all reasonably
25available containment and cleanup resources from being used to
26protect every environmentally and ecologically sensitive area
27possible.
Environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas shall
28be prioritized through the evaluation of criteria, including, but not
29limited to, all of the following:
30(A) Risk of contamination by oil after a spill.
31(B) Environmental, ecological, recreational, and economic
32importance.
33(C) Risk of public exposure should the area be contaminated.
34(2) Regional maps depicting environmentally and ecologically
35sensitive areas in marine waters or along the coast that shall be
36distributed to facilities and local and state agencies. The maps shall
37
designate those areas that have particularly high priority for
38protection against oil spills.
39(3) A plan for protection actions required to be taken in the
40event of an oil spill for each of the environmentally and
P7 1ecologically sensitive areas and protection priorities for the first
224 to 48 hours after an oil spill shall be specified.
3(4) The location of available response equipment and the
4availability of trained personnel to deploy the equipment to protect
5the priority environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas.
6(5) A program for systemically testing and revising, if necessary,
7protection strategies for each of the priority environmentally and
8ecologically sensitive areas.
9(6) Any recommendations for action that cannot be financed or
10implemented pursuant to existing authority of the administrator,
11which shall also be reported to the Legislature along with
12recommendations for financing those actions.
13(e) An element that considers the variability in physical and
14chemical properties of oil transported to, and within, the state and
15its waters.
O
98