BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 1326
Page 1
Date of Hearing: June 10, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER
PROTECTION
Susan A. Bonilla, Chair
SB 1326 (Roth) - As Amended: April 21, 2014
SENATE VOTE : 37-0
SUBJECT : Hearings aids: warranty: work order or receipt.
SUMMARY : Requires the warranty period for hearing aids to
begin on the initial date of delivery to the buyer, with the
written warranty specifying the initial date of delivery, the
expiration date of the warranty and the date when the hearing
aid warranty tolling period ends. Specifically, this bill :
1)Requires all new and used hearing aids sold in the state to be
accompanied by the retail seller's written warranty which
shall contain the following language: "This hearing aid is
warranted to be specifically fit for the particular needs of
you, the buyer. If the hearing aid is not initially fit for
your particular needs, it may be returned to the seller within
30 days of the initial date of delivery to you. If you return
the hearing aid, the seller will either adjust or replace the
hearing aid or promptly refund the total amount paid. This
warranty does not affect the protections and remedies you have
under other laws."
2)Authorizes the retail seller to specify any longer period for
the return of an unfit hearing aid.
3)Requires the written warranty to include the initial date of
delivery to the buyer and the expiration date of the warranty.
4)Requires, if the warranty period relating to an implied or
express warranty has tolled for specified reasons, that the
warranty period for hearing aids resumes on the date upon
which the repaired or serviced hearing aid is delivered to the
buyer, or five days after the buyer is notified the hearing
aid is repaired or serviced and is available for the buyer's
possession, whichever is earlier.
5)Requires a hearing aid seller, after receiving the hearing aid
SB 1326
Page 2
for warranty repairs or service, to provide to the buyer at
the time of delivery to the buyer a work order or receipt that
also specifies the date the warranty period resumes and the
revised expiration date of the warranty, as adjusted to
reflect the suspension of the warranty period under the
tolling provisions.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Establishes the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act
(Song-Beverly) to define the obligations of consumer goods
manufacturers and retailers and to provide remedies for breach
of implied or express warranty. (Civil Code (CIV) Section
1790, et seq.)
2)Defines "consumer goods" to include new and used assistive
devices sold at retail, and defines "assistive device" to
include any instrument, or part or accessory thereof, that is
used to assist an individual with a disability in the
mitigation or treatment of an injury or disease or to assist
or affect or replace the structure or any function of the body
of an individual with a disability, as specified. (CIV 1791)
3)Requires retail sellers, at the time of sale of a new or used
assistive device sold at retail, to include the retail
seller's written warranty which is required to state all of
the following:
a) The assistive device is warranted to be specifically fit
for the particular needs of the buyer, and if the device is
not specifically fit for the buyer's needs, it may be
returned to the seller within 30 days of the date of actual
receipt or completion of fitting by the seller, which comes
later;
b) If the buyer returns the device, the seller will either
adjust or replace the device or promptly refund the total
amount paid; and
c) The warranty does not affect protections or remedies
under other laws; as specified. (CIV 1793.02(a), (b))
4)If the buyer returns the device within the specified period,
requires the seller, without charge and within a reasonable
time, to adjust the device or, if appropriate, replace it with
SB 1326
Page 3
a device that is specifically fit for the particular needs of
the buyer. (CIV 1793.02(c))
5)If the seller does not adjust or replace the device, the
seller is required to: promptly refund the total amount paid
and the transaction is deemed rescinded, promptly return all
payments and any assistive device or other consideration
exchanged as part of the transaction, and cancel all
contracts, instruments, and security agreements executed by
the buyer in connection with the sale; and is prohibited from
imposing a charge, penalty, or other fee in connection with
the purchase, fitting, financing, or return of the device.
(CIV 1793.02(c))
6)Automatically tolls every warranty period relating to an
implied or express warranty accompanying a sale or consignment
for sale of consumer goods selling for $50 or more for the
period from the date upon which the buyer either (a) delivers
the nonconforming goods to the manufacturer or seller for
warranty repairs or service or (b) notifies the manufacturer
or seller of the nonconformity of the goods, up to and
including the date upon which either (y) the repaired or
serviced goods are delivered to the buyer or (z) the buyer is
notified the goods are repaired or serviced and are available
for the buyer's possession, as specified. (CIV 1795.6(a))
7)Provides that the warranty period shall not be deemed expired
if the warranty repairs or service has not been performed due
to delays caused by circumstances beyond the control of the
buyer, or the warranty repairs or service performed on the
nonconforming goods did not remedy the nonconformity for which
those repairs or service was performed and the buyer notified
the manufacturer or seller of this failure within 60 days
after the repairs or service was completed. (CIV 1795.6(b))
8)Provides that when the warranty repairs or service has been
performed so as to remedy the nonconformity, the warranty
period shall expire in accordance with its terms, including
any extension to the warranty period for warranty repairs or
service. (CIV 1795.6)
9)Requires every manufacturer or seller of consumer goods
selling for $50 or more to provide a receipt to the buyer
showing the date of purchase, and requires every manufacturer
or seller performing warranty repairs or service on the goods
SB 1326
Page 4
to provide to the buyer a work order or receipt with the date
of return and either the date the buyer was notified that the
goods were repaired or serviced or, where applicable, the date
the goods were shipped or delivered to the buyer. (CIV
1795.6(d))
FISCAL EFFECT : None. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the
Legislative Counsel.
COMMENTS :
1)Purpose of this bill . This bill would modify the warranty
provisions for hearing aids by eliminating the "completion of
fitting" standard that determines the start of the warranty
period. Under current law, the warranty period for assistive
devices lasts for 30 days after the date of receipt by the
buyer or 30 days after the completion of fitting by the
seller, whichever is later. This bill would start the
warranty "clock" upon initial delivery only stopping or
"tolling" when the hearing aid is being repaired or refitted,
which could lead to an overall shorter warranty period. This
bill would also require disclosures of the warranty expiration
date and provisions for tolling. The purpose is to prevent the
warranty clock from "restarting" at 30 days every time a
hearing aid is adjusted, which in some cases can cause a 30
day warranty to last multiple months. This bill is sponsored
by Hearing Healthcare Providers California.
2)Author's statement . According to the author, "The technology
of hearing aids has advanced significantly since Song-Beverly
was introduced in 1979. At that time, hearing aids were
analog; 'fitting' them meant turning the volume up or down.
Modern digital hearing aids convert sound into a code that can
be adjusted to amplify specific parts of the sound to meet an
individual's needs. Due to this additional complexity, the
fitting of a hearing aid takes longer, with each fitting
requiring the hearing aid be returned to the provider for
adjustment.
"The problem lies with the several interpretation[s] of what
completion of fitting means in Song-Beverly. Currently, the
30 days may toll, only to be restarted with each successive
trip to the provider. The result is a warranty period that
can last upwards of a year or more.
SB 1326
Page 5
"The purpose of this bill is to provide a defined and reliable
warranty period for new and used hearing aid devices."
3)Hearing aid technology . There are two main types of hearing
aids: analog, which convert sound waves into electrical
signals that are amplified, and digital, which convert sound
waves into numerical codes (similar to the binary code of a
computer) before amplifying them, which provides more
flexibility in adjusting the aid to a user's needs and to
certain listening environments. Technological advances in
digital hearing aids have increased the effectiveness of
hearing aids dramatically, which have also increased the cost
and complexity of these devices. Hearing aids may range from
a few hundred to a few thousand dollars (and costs may double
if two hearing aids are required), and "fitting" the hearing
aid may require multiple visits and readjustments.
4)The role of audiologists and dispensers . In California, the
SpeechLanguage Pathology and Audiology Board (Board) licenses
and regulates over 700 audiologists, over 900 dispensing
audiologists, and over 1,000 hearing aid dispensers.
Audiologists provide services to individuals with hearing,
balance, and related communic5)ative disorders; dispensing
audiologists are licensed audiologists who meet the
qualifications to fit and sell hearing aids and are certified
by the Board. Hearing aid dispensers fit or sell hearing aids
to individuals with impaired hearing.
Licensees are required to provide to the buyer of a hearing aid
a written receipt signed by or on behalf of the licensee that
contains, among other things, the date of the sale,
specifications on the hearing aid sold, the address where the
licensee shall be available to fit, adjust, or service the
hearing aid, and the terms of any guarantee or written
warranty as required by the Song-Beverly Act, which provides
warranty provisions for consumers of assistive devices.
6)Warranty provisions relating to assistive devices . The
product warranty or "right of return" provisions of
Song-Beverly apply to the sale and refund of hearing aids.
According to the Board's 2012 Sunset Report, the provisions of
Song-Beverly have been difficult to enforce because the
warranty language is vague and is interpreted in several
different ways, with the resulting confusion hurting both the
consumer and the hearing aid dispenser.
SB 1326
Page 6
Currently, Song-Beverly requires that every sale of an assistive
device at retail be accompanied by the retail seller's implied
warranty that the device is specifically fit for the
particular needs of the buyer. Song-Beverly also requires
that at the time of sale, the assistive device include the
retail seller's written warranty which states that the device
is warranted to be specifically fit for the particular needs
of the buyer and that it may be returned to the seller "within
30 days of the date of receipt or completion of the fitting,
whichever comes later," so that the seller can either adjust
or replace the device, or refund the amount paid if the device
is not fit for the buyer's needs.
In its Sunset Report, the Board found that the term "completion
of the fitting" does not have a meaning that is universally
understood or agreed upon by both the retailer and the buyer.
As a result, the retailer must ultimately determine when the
device is deemed "fit," and the buyer must also be in
agreement because the term implies some level of satisfaction
with the fit of the hearing aid. Often times, an agreement
cannot be reached, and the hearing aid dispenser is faced with
ongoing adjustments and exchanges with no foreseeable end date
to the 30-day warranty period. The Board states that it is
difficult to enforce or even clearly delineate a warranty
period that is interpreted to start on the date the consumer
was satisfied.
Song-Beverly also provides that this warranty period
automatically tolls from the date upon which the buyer either
delivers the nonconforming goods to the seller for warranty
repairs or service, or notifies the seller of the problem
until the date upon which the repaired or serviced goods are
delivered to the buyer or the buyer is notified the goods are
fixed and available. According to the Board, these provisions
are not sufficient to address those instances when the device
may require adjustment or repair and is not in the possession
of the buyer.
As a result, the Board asserts that the lack of clarity and
specificity in Song-Beverly results in disputes between
consumers and hearing aid dispensers, and ultimately some form
of legal recourse or mediation is initiated. However, the
Board finds it difficult to mediate these complaints when the
parties have different interpretations of Song-Beverly.
SB 1326
Page 7
According to the Board, more than 25% of complaints received
annually are related to refunds on hearing aids. In resolving
these complaints, the Board has interpreted the warranty
period as beginning on the date of the last fitting or
adjustment of the hearing aid.
As a result, the author and sponsor would clearly define the
length of the warranty period and when the tolling provisions
resume, and would also require that warranty period to be
clearly disclosed to the buyer, to make clear to buyers and
sellers their rights under Song-Beverly and to provide
consistent interpretation and enforcement of hearing aid
complaints.
7)Hearing aid warranty provisions in other states . In Florida,
hearing aids also have a 30 day trial period and refund
policy, and the warranty period is tolled when the hearing aid
is being repaired, remade, or adjusted for one day for each
24-hour period the hearing aid is not in the buyer's
possession. The warranty period resumes on the date the buyer
reclaims the hearing aid or on the fourth day after
notification of its availability. Texas also has a similar
policy, except that the warranty period resumes on the day the
buyer reclaims the hearing aid or within five days of
notification of its availability.
8)Question for the Committee . Existing law (Civil Code Section
1793.02(a)(2)(C)) requires the written warranty to "include
the initial date of delivery to the buyer of the hearing
expiration date of the warranty." Existing law also requires
this written warranty to be provided to the buyer at the time
of the sale.
However, at the time of the sale, the retail seller may not know
when the hearing aid will be delivered to the buyer. When a
hearing aid is sold, impressions of the ear may be collected
to develop the hearing aid, and it may take a few weeks for
the hearing aid to be ready for delivery. As a result, the
retail seller could not accurately provide the date of
delivery and the expiration date of the warranty.
The Committee members and author may wish to consider the
following amendment to ensure that the information provided to
the buyer relating to the initial date of delivery and the
expiration of the warranty period is accurate, and not an
SB 1326
Page 8
estimate:
On page 3, line 18 of the bill, strike "The retail seller's
written warranty shall include" and add, "On the initial
date of delivery, the retail seller shall revise the
written warranty to include".
9)Arguments in support . According to the sponsors, "[This bill]
would provide needed clarification for consumers in defining
the warranty period for hearing aids. Greater specificity
will further protect the public by providing the [Board] with
consistent enforcement criteria when examining hearing aid
dispensing complaints."
The Board also writes in support, "The vagueness and lack of
specificity in the [Song-Beverly] language makes it difficult
for the Board to mediate consumer complaints when the buyer
and seller have different interpretations of their rights and
responsibilities. [This bill] will provide the Board with
clear enforcement direction to both consumers and sellers of
hearing aids."
10)Previous legislation . SB 1444 (Anderson) of 2012 would have
authorized a buyer to return a hearing aid to the seller
within 30 days from the date the buyer is fitted with the
hearing aid and takes possession of it, tolled that warranty
period for one day for each 24-hour period that the hearing
aid is not in the buyer's possession until the date the buyer
reclaimed the hearing aid or five days after he or she
received notice the hearing aid was available. This bill was
held in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
SB 648 (Battin) of 2003 would have authorized a seller of an
assistive device to charge the buyer a nominal fee for any
readjustment of that device during the warranty period, and
would have required the written warranty that accompanies the
sale of an assistive device to inform the buyer that a nominal
fee may be charged for readjustments during the warranty
period. This bill was held in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
SB 1326
Page 9
Support
Hearing Healthcare Providers California (sponsor)
California Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology & Hearing Aid
Dispensers Board
Bartlett's Hearing Aids
Chico Hearing Aid Center
Two individuals
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by : Eunie Linden / B.,P. & C.P. / (916)
319-3301