BILL ANALYSIS �
SB 1335
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 6, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
SB 1335 (Leno) - As Amended: June 30, 2014
Policy Committee: Revenue &
Taxation Vote: 6-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires future bills introduced on or after January
1, 2015 that establish new tax credits under either the personal
income tax or corporation tax law to identify specific goals,
purposes, and objectives for the credits as well as define
performance indicators and specify data collection requirements
in order to evaluate the effectiveness of those tax credits in
achieving the identified goals, purposes, and objectives.
FISCAL EFFECT
No immediate fiscal impact; potentially significant costs to the
Franchise Tax Board and other state departments to implement the
data collection and performance evaluation requirements for
future tax credit bills.
COMMENTS
1) Purpose. The author contends tax credits should be evaluated
alongside direct spending programs as both constitute public
initiatives and investments of public funds intended to
accomplish specific goals. The author asserts tax credits
typically do not include the accountability measures,
oversight, and transparency common to direct spending
activities. The Legislative Analyst's Office has noted that
resources are allocated to tax expenditure programs (including
tax credits) automatically, often without legislative review
since there is no periodic appropriation or budget process for
those programs.
2) Advisory Legislation. Courts in California have long held a
SB 1335
Page 2
legislature may not limit or bind successive legislatures, and
future legislatures are under no legal obligation to comply
with the requirements of previously-enacted statutes.
Although its policy aims are laudable, this bill is not a
constitutional measure, and there is nothing to prevent a
future legislature from disregarding its requirements.
3) Previous Legislation. This bill contains nearly identical
provisions to those contained in SB 508 (Wolk) of 2011 and SB
1272 (Wolk) of 2010, except that those bills also contained
mandatory sunset provisions for new tax credits. Both bills
were vetoed, although the veto messages for each focused more
on the mandatory sunset provisions than the performance
criteria provisions, which are the sole focus of this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916) 319-2081