BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 1337
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 18, 2014

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
                                 Jim Frazier, Chair
                   SB 1337 (DeSaulnier) - As Amended:  May 27, 2014

           SENATE VOTE  :   35-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   Reports

           SUMMARY  :   Adds a new provision to the Government Code that  
          requires written reports submitted to the Legislature or  
          executive body, by any state agency or department, to include a  
          signed statement by the head of that agency or department  
          declaring that the factual contents of the report are true,  
          accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Specifies the applicable executive officers for the Franchise  
            Tax Board and the State Board of Equalization.

          2)Stipulates that the provisions of this bill apply to the head  
            of every state agency or department, including, but not  
            limited to, elected state officials, and any state official  
            whose duties are prescribed by the California Constitution.

          3)Defines "written report" as:
             a)   A document required by statute to be prepared and  
               submitted to the Legislature or any state legislative or  
               executive body.
             b)   A document, summary, or statement requested by a Member  
               of the Legislature.

          4)Exempts forecasts, predictions, recommendations or opinions  
            from this requirement.

          5)Specifies that any person who declares as true any material  
            matter that he/she knows to be false shall be liable for a  
            civil penalty not to exceed $20,000 and provides that the  
            penalty shall be exclusively assessed and recovered in a civil  
            action by the Attorney General.

           EXISTING LAW  provides, but is not limited to, the following:

          1)Every wilful omission to perform any duty enjoined by law upon  








                                                                  SB 1337
                                                                  Page  2

            any public officer, or person holding any public trust or  
            employment, where no special provision is made for the  
            punishment of such delinquency, is punishable as a misdemeanor  
            (Government Code Section 1222).

          2)Every person who, while taking and subscribing to the oath or  
            affirmation required by this chapter, states as true any  
            material matter which he or she knows to be false, is guilty  
            of perjury, and is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to  
            subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code for two,  
            three, or four years (Government Code Section 1368).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, likely minor costs to the Department of Justice for  
          investigation and prosecutions related to the provisions that  
          require a signed declaration with agency reports, offset to some  
          extent by fine revenue.


           COMMENTS  :   According to the author's office, currently heads of  
          state departments or agencies have no liability for  
          misrepresenting facts in reports to the legislature or a state  
          executive body. The author notes that the construction of the  
          new eastern span of the Bay Bridge was 10 years late and over $5  
          billion over budget.  This project particularly illustrated how  
          problematic it can be when department and agency heads are not  
          held accountable.

          During Joint Legislative Audit Committee hearings in the early  
          2000s to review the state audit on the Bay Bridge project, it  
          was found that Caltrans and other agency heads had withheld  
          information from the Legislature or misrepresented certain  
          facts, such as cost overruns and evidence of project  
          mismanagement.

          The Department of Finance opposes this bill stating it is  
          unnecessary and could result in additional costs to the state.

          However, this bill contributes to current law that seeks to  
          ensure that all state reports, as specified, are true, accurate  
          and complete.  This bill also provides accountability for those  
          state employees responsible for certifying the accuracy of these  
          reports.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :








                                                                  SB 1337
                                                                  Page  3


           Support 
           
          California Tax Payer Association
           
            Opposition 
           
          Department of Finance

           Analysis Prepared by  :    William Herms / A. & A.R. / (916)  
          319-3600