SB 1365, as amended, Padilla. California Voting Rights Act of 2001.
Existing law, the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA), prohibits the use of an at-large election in a political subdivision if it would impair the ability of a protected class, as defined, to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election. The CVRA provides that a voter who is a member of a protected class may bring an action in superior court to enforce the provisions of the CVRA, and, if the voter prevails in the case, he or she may be awarded reasonable litigation costs and attorney’s fees.begin insert The CVRA requires a court to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, that are tailored to remedy a violation of the act.end insert
This bill would also prohibit the use of a district-based election in a political subdivision if it would impair the ability of a protected class, as defined, to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election.begin insert The bill would require a court to implement specified remedies upon a finding that a district-based election was imposed or applied in a manner that impaired the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 14027 of the Elections Code is amended
2to read:
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insert An at-large method of electionbegin delete or a district-based shall not be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs
4electionend delete
5the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or
6its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as a result of
7the dilution or the abridgment of the rights of voters who are
8members of a protected class, as defined pursuant to Section 14026.
9(b) A district-based election shall not be imposed or applied in
10a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect
11candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of
12an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment of the
13rights of voters who are members of a protected class, as defined
14pursuant to Section 14026.
begin insertSection 14029 of the end insertbegin insertElections Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to
16read:end insert
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insert Upon a finding of a violation ofbegin insert subdivision (a) ofend insert
18 Section 14027 and Section 14028, the court shall implement
19appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based
20elections, that are tailored to remedy the violation.
21(b) (1) Upon a finding of a violation of subdivision (b) of
22Section
14027 and Section 14028, the court shall implement
23appropriate remedies, as provided in this subdivision, that are
24tailored to remedy the violation and that are guided in part by the
25views of the protected class.
26(2) (A) If reasonably feasible, the court shall implement, as an
27appropriate remedy under this subdivision, a redistricting plan
28that provides the protected class the opportunity to elect candidates
29of its choice.
30(B) If a redistricting plan under subparagraph (A) is not
31reasonably feasible, the court shall implement, as an appropriate
32remedy under this subdivision, a redistricting plan that provides
33the protected class the opportunity to
join with a coalition of
34groups to elect candidates of their choice.
P3 1(C) A redistricting plan implemented under this paragraph shall
2comply with all applicable state and federal laws.
3(D) In addition to implementing a redistricting plan under this
4paragraph, a court may implement additional remedies, including
5the remedies provided in paragraph (3).
6(3) If a redistricting plan under paragraph (2) is not reasonably
7feasible, the court shall implement other appropriate remedies,
8including, but not limited to, increasing the size of the governing
9body; issuing an injunction to delay an election; or requiring
an
10election to be held on the same day as a statewide election, as
11provided in Section 1001.
12(c) This section does not prohibit the parties from settling a
13dispute arising under this chapter. If the parties agree to settle a
14dispute, the parties shall consider the remedies provided for in
15this section when negotiating a settlement agreement.
O
98