Amended in Assembly June 16, 2014

Amended in Senate April 21, 2014

Senate BillNo. 1365


Introduced by Senator Padilla

begin insert

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Alejo)

end insert

February 21, 2014


An act tobegin delete amend Sections 14027 and 14029 ofend deletebegin insert add the heading of Article 1 (commencing with Section 14025) and the heading of Article 2 (commencing with Section 14027) to, and to add Article 3 (commencing with Section 14040) to, Chapter 1.5 of Division 14 ofend insert the Elections Code, relating to elections.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1365, as amended, Padilla. California Voting Rights Act of 2001.

Existing law, the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA), prohibits the use of an at-large election in a political subdivision if it would impair the ability of a protected class, as defined, to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election. The CVRA provides that a voter who is a member of a protected class may bring an action in superior court to enforce the provisions of the CVRA, and, if the voter prevails in the case, he or she may be awarded reasonable litigation costs and attorney’s fees. The CVRA requires a court to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, that are tailored to remedy a violation of the act.

This bill wouldbegin delete alsoend deletebegin insert provide parallel provisions thatend insert prohibit the use of a district-based election in a political subdivision if it would impair the ability of a protected class, as defined, to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election. The bill would require a court to implement specified remedies upon a finding that a district-based election was imposed or applied in a manner that impaired the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence the outcome of an election.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertThe Legislature finds and declares that the
2purpose of this act is to address ongoing vote dilution and
3discrimination in voting as matters of statewide concern, in order
4to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed to California voters
5under Section 7 of Article I and Section 2 of Article II of the
6California Constitution. Therefore, the provisions of this act shall
7be construed liberally in furtherance of this legislative intent to
8eliminate minority vote dilution. It is the further intent of the
9Legislature that any remedy implemented under this act shall
10comply with the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.end insert

11begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert

begin insertThe heading of Article 1 (commencing with Section
1214025) is added to Chapter 1.5 of Division 14 of the end insert
begin insertElections
13Code
end insert
begin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert

14 

15Article begin insert1.end insert  General Provisions
16

 

end insert
17begin insert

begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

end insert

begin insertThe heading of Article 2 (commencing with Section
1814027) is added to Chapter 1.5 of Division 14 of the end insert
begin insertElections
19Code
end insert
begin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert

20 

21Article begin insert2.end insert  At-Large Elections
22

 

end insert
23begin insert

begin insertSEC. 4.end insert  

end insert

begin insertArticle 3 (commencing with Section 14040) is added
24to Chapter 1.5 of Division 14 of the end insert
begin insertElections Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert

25 

26Article begin insert3.end insert  District-Based Elections
27

 

28

begin insert14040.end insert  

District-based elections shall not be imposed or applied
29in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect
30candidates of its choice, or its ability to influence the outcome of
P3    1an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment of the
2rights of voters who are members of a protected class.

3

begin insert14041.end insert  

(a) A violation of Section 14040 is established if it is
4shown that racially polarized voting occurs in elections for
5members of the governing body of the political subdivision or in
6elections incorporating other electoral choices by the voters of
7the political subdivision. Elections conducted prior to the filing
8of an action pursuant to Section 14040 and this section are more
9probative to establish the existence of racially polarized voting
10than elections conducted after the filing of the action.

11(b) The occurrence of racially polarized voting shall be
12determined from examining results of elections in which at least
13one candidate is a member of a protected class or elections
14involving ballot measures, or other electoral choices that affect
15 the rights and privileges of members of a protected class. One
16circumstance that may be considered in determining a violation
17of Section 14040 and this section is the extent to which candidates
18who are members of a protected class and who are preferred by
19voters of the protected class, as determined by an analysis of voting
20behavior, have been elected to the governing body of a political
21subdivision that is the subject of an action based on Section 14040
22and this section.

23(c) The fact that members of a protected class are not
24geographically compact or concentrated may not preclude a
25finding of racially polarized voting, or a violation of Section 14040
26and this section, but may be a factor in determining an appropriate
27remedy.

28(d) Proof of an intent on the part of the voters or elected officials
29to discriminate against a protected class is not required.

30(e) Other factors such as the history of discrimination, the use
31of electoral devices or other voting practices or procedures that
32may enhance the dilutive effects of the election system, denial of
33access to those processes determining which groups of candidates
34will receive financial or other support in a given election, the
35extent to which members of a protected class bear the effects of
36past discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and
37health, which hinder their ability to participate effectively in the
38political process, and the use of overt or subtle racial appeals in
39political campaigns are probative, but not necessary factors, to
40establish a violation of Section 14040 and this section.

P4    1(f) The fact that a district-based election was imposed on the
2political subdivision as a result of an action filed pursuant to
3Article 2 shall not be a defense to an action alleging a violation
4of this article.

5

begin insert14042.end insert  

(a) (1) Upon a finding of a violation of Section 14040
6and Section 14041, the court shall implement appropriate remedies,
7as provided in this subdivision, that are tailored to remedy the
8violation and that are guided in part by the views of the protected
9class.

10(2) (A) The court shall implement, as an appropriate remedy
11under this subdivision, an effective district-based elections system
12that provide the protected class the opportunity to elect candidates
13of its choice from single-member districts.

14(B) If no such additional effective districts under subparagraph
15(A) is possible, the court shall implement, as an appropriate remedy
16 under this subdivision, a single-member district-based election
17system that provide the protected class the opportunity to join in
18a coalition of groups to elect candidates of their choice.

19(C) In addition to implementing district-based elections under
20this paragraph, a court may implement additional remedies,
21including the remedies provided in paragraph (3).

22(3) If the remedies under paragraph (2) are not legally viable,
23the court shall implement other appropriate remedies, including,
24but not limited to, increasing the size of the governing body; issuing
25an injunction to delay an election; or requiring an election to be
26held on the same day as a statewide election, as provided in Section
271001.

28(b) This section does not prohibit the parties from settling a
29dispute arising under this article. If the parties agree to settle a
30dispute, the parties shall consider the remedies provided for in
31this section when negotiating a settlement agreement. However,
32this section does not limit the remedies available in out-of-court
33settlements.

34

begin insert14043.end insert  

In any action to enforce Section 14040 and Section
3514041, the court shall allow the prevailing plaintiff party, other
36than the state or political subdivision thereof, a reasonable
37attorney’s fee consistent with the standards established in Serrano
38v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 48-49, and litigation expenses
39including, but not limited to, expert witness fees and expenses as
40part of the costs. Prevailing defendant parties shall not recover
P5    1any costs, unless the court finds the action to be frivolous,
2unreasonable, or without foundation.

3

begin insert14044.end insert  

Any voter who is a member of a protected class and
4who resides in a political subdivision where a violation of Sections
514040 and 14041 is alleged may file an action pursuant to those
6sections in the superior court of the county in which the political
7subdivision is located.

8

begin insert14045.end insert  

If any provision of this article or its application to any
9person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the article
10or the application of the provision to other persons or
11circumstances shall not be affected.

end insert
begin delete
12

SECTION 1.  

Section 14027 of the Elections Code is amended
13to read:

14

14027.  

(a) An at-large method of election shall not be imposed
15or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class
16to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the
17outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment
18of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class, as
19defined pursuant to Section 14026.

20(b) A district-based election shall not be imposed or applied in
21a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect
22candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of
23an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgment of the
24rights of voters who are members of a protected class, as defined
25pursuant to Section 14026.

26

SEC. 2.  

Section 14029 of the Elections Code is amended to
27read:

28

14029.  

(a) Upon a finding of a violation of subdivision (a) of
29Section 14027 and Section 14028, the court shall implement
30appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based
31elections, that are tailored to remedy the violation.

32(b) (1) Upon a finding of a violation of subdivision (b) of
33Section 14027 and Section 14028, the court shall implement
34appropriate remedies, as provided in this subdivision, that are
35tailored to remedy the violation and that are guided in part by the
36views of the protected class.

37(2) (A) If reasonably feasible, the court shall implement, as an
38appropriate remedy under this subdivision, a redistricting plan that
39provides the protected class the opportunity to elect candidates of
40its choice.

P6    1(B) If a redistricting plan under subparagraph (A) is not
2reasonably feasible, the court shall implement, as an appropriate
3remedy under this subdivision, a redistricting plan that provides
4the protected class the opportunity to join with a coalition of groups
5to elect candidates of their choice.

6(C) A redistricting plan implemented under this paragraph shall
7comply with all applicable state and federal laws.

8(D) In addition to implementing a redistricting plan under this
9paragraph, a court may implement additional remedies, including
10the remedies provided in paragraph (3).

11(3) If a redistricting plan under paragraph (2) is not reasonably
12feasible, the court shall implement other appropriate remedies,
13including, but not limited to, increasing the size of the governing
14body; issuing an injunction to delay an election; or requiring an
15election to be held on the same day as a statewide election, as
16provided in Section 1001.

17(c) This section does not prohibit the parties from settling a
18dispute arising under this chapter. If the parties agree to settle a
19dispute, the parties shall consider the remedies provided for in this
20section when negotiating a settlement agreement.

end delete


O

    97